Literature DB >> 21672822

The integration of locomotion and prey capture in vertebrates: Morphology, behavior, and performance.

Timothy E Higham1.   

Abstract

For most vertebrates, locomotion is a fundamental component of prey capture. Despite this ubiquitous link, few studies have quantified the integration of these complex systems. Several variables related to locomotor performance, including maximum speed, acceleration, deceleration, maneuverability, accuracy, and approach stability, likely influence feeding performance in vertebrates. The relative importance of these measures of performance, however, depends on the ecology of the predator. While factors such as morphology and physiology likely define the limits of these variables, other factors such as motivation of the predator, prey type, and habitat structure can also influence performance. Understanding how these variables relate to feeding under a given suite of ecological conditions is central to understanding predator-prey interactions, and ultimately how locomotion and feeding have co-evolved. The goals of this article are to discuss several variables of locomotor performance related to prey capture, present new data on the relationship between locomotor and feeding morphology in fishes, discuss the evolution of prey capture in cichlid fishes, and outline some future directions for research. While suction feeding is a primary mechanism of prey capture in fishes, swimming is vital for accurately positioning the mouth relative to the prey item. Many fishes decelerate during prey capture using their body and fins, but the pectoral fins have a dominant role in maintaining approach stability. This suggests that fishes employing high-performance suction feeding (relatively small mouth) will have larger pectoral fins to facilitate accurate and stable feeding. I provide new data on the relationship between pectoral fin morphology and maximum gape in centrarchid fishes. For seven species, pectoral fin area was significantly, and negatively, correlated with maximum gape. This example illustrates that the demands from one complex system (feeding) can influence another complex system (locomotion). Future studies that examine the morphological, physiological, and functional evolution of locomotion involved in prey capture by aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates will provide insight into the origin and consequences of diversity.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21672822     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icm021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  13 in total

1.  Separating the effects of prey size and speed on the kinematics of prey capture in the omnivorous lizard Gerrhosaurus major.

Authors:  Stéphane J Montuelle; Anthony Herrel; Paul-Antoine Libourel; Lionel Reveret; Vincent L Bels
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Speciation through the lens of biomechanics: locomotion, prey capture and reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham; Sean M Rogers; R Brian Langerhans; Heather A Jamniczky; George V Lauder; William J Stewart; Christopher H Martin; David N Reznick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Wing Shape in Waterbirds: Morphometric Patterns Associated with Behavior, Habitat, Migration, and Phylogenetic Convergence.

Authors:  Stephanie L Baumgart; Paul C Sereno; Mark W Westneat
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2021-05-17

4.  Fast and Furious: Energetic Tradeoffs and Scaling of High-Speed Foraging in Rorqual Whales.

Authors:  William T Gough; David E Cade; Max F Czapanskiy; Jean Potvin; Frank E Fish; Shirel R Kahane-Rapport; Matthew S Savoca; K C Bierlich; David W Johnston; Ari S Friedlaender; Andy Szabo; Lars Bejder; Jeremy A Goldbogen
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2022-08-27

5.  Individual variation in functional response parameters is explained by body size but not by behavioural types in a poeciliid fish.

Authors:  Arne Schröder; Gregor Kalinkat; Robert Arlinghaus
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Metabolic expenditures of lunge feeding rorquals across scale: implications for the evolution of filter feeding and the limits to maximum body size.

Authors:  Jean Potvin; Jeremy A Goldbogen; Robert E Shadwick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Selection towards different adaptive optima drove the early diversification of locomotor phenotypes in the radiation of Neotropical geophagine cichlids.

Authors:  Viviana Astudillo-Clavijo; Jessica H Arbour; Hernán López-Fernández
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Lake Malawi cichlid evolution along a benthic/limnetic axis.

Authors:  C D Hulsey; R J Roberts; Y-H E Loh; M F Rupp; J T Streelman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Thermal ecological physiology of native and invasive frog species: do invaders perform better?

Authors:  Pablo A Cortes; Hans Puschel; Paz Acuña; José L Bartheld; Francisco Bozinovic
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.079

10.  Monitoring escape and feeding behaviours of cruiser fish by inertial and magnetic sensors.

Authors:  Takuji Noda; Yuuki Kawabata; Nobuaki Arai; Hiromichi Mitamura; Shun Watanabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.