Literature DB >> 36125516

Abdominal subcutaneous obesity and the risk of burst abdomen: a matched case-control study.

Madeline Kvist1,2, Jakob Burcharth3,4, Yousef Wirenfeldt Nielsen5, Thomas Korgaard Jensen3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The causes of burst abdomen after midline laparotomy remain uncertain. Obesity is a suspected risk factor. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between abdominal subcutaneous obesity (ASO) and burst abdomen in patients undergoing emergency midline laparotomy.
METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, retrospective, matched case-control study of patients undergoing emergency midline laparotomy from May 2016 to August 2021. Patients suffering from burst abdomen were matched 1:4 with controls based on age and sex. Abdominal wall closure was standardized in the study period with the small bites, small stitches technique. ASO was defined as the highest sex-specific quartile (≥ 75%) of subcutaneous fat layer evaluated on CT. The primary outcome was the association between ASO and burst abdomen, stratified between cases and controls. Secondary outcomes included 30- and 90-day mortality, length of stay, and suspected risk factors of burst abdomen, assessed by multivariate analysis across cases and controls.
RESULTS: A total of 475 patients were included in this study, with 95 cases matched to 380 controls. Liver cirrhosis, active smoking, and high alcohol consumption were more common among cases in an unadjusted analysis. Liver cirrhosis (odds ratio (OR) 3.32, p = 0.045) and active smoking (OR 1.98, p = 0.009) remained significant in a multivariate analysis and were associated with burst abdomen. One hundred twenty-four patients had ASO. ASO was not significantly associated with burst abdomen (OR 1.11, p = 0.731).
CONCLUSION: ASO was not found to be associated with an increased risk of burst abdomen after emergency midline laparotomy.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burst abdomen; Laparotomy; Obesity; Wound healing

Year:  2022        PMID: 36125516     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02682-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   2.895


  29 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions (Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1350-1356).

Authors:  P Smart; G B Mann
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Prognostic models of abdominal wound dehiscence after laparotomy.

Authors:  Clinton Webster; Leigh Neumayer; Randall Smout; Susan Horn; Jennifer Daley; William Henderson; Shukri Khuri
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Factors influencing wound dehiscence.

Authors:  J P Riou; J R Cohen; H Johnson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Reduced Rate of Dehiscence After Implementation of a Standardized Fascial Closure Technique in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy.

Authors:  Mai-Britt Tolstrup; Sara Kehlet Watt; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  A prospective evaluation of the risk factors for development of wound dehiscence and incisional hernia.

Authors:  Kerim Bora Yılmaz; Melih Akıncı; Lütfi Doğan; Niyazi Karaman; Cihangir Özaslan; Can Atalay
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2013-03-01

Review 6.  Acute wound failure.

Authors:  M A Carlson
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Predictors of relaparotomy after nontrauma emergency general surgery with initial fascial closure.

Authors:  Jerry J Kim; Mike K Liang; Anuradha Subramanian; Courtney J Balentine; Shubhada Sansgiry; Samir S Awad
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Addition of rectus sheath relaxation incisions to emergency midline laparotomy for peritonitis to prevent fascial dehiscence.

Authors:  Sanjay Marwah; Nisha Marwah; Mandeep Singh; Ajay Kapoor; Rajender Kumar Karwasra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Randomized clinical trial comparing polypropylene or polydioxanone for midline abdominal wall closure.

Authors:  A Bloemen; P van Dooren; B F Huizinga; A G M Hoofwijk
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  The efficacy of risk scores for predicting abdominal wound dehiscence: a case-controlled validation study.

Authors:  Jakub Kenig; Piotr Richter; Anna Lasek; Katarzyna Zbierska; Sabina Zurawska
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.