Literature DB >> 12643854

Prognostic models of abdominal wound dehiscence after laparotomy.

Clinton Webster1, Leigh Neumayer, Randall Smout, Susan Horn, Jennifer Daley, William Henderson, Shukri Khuri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Portions of the prospective, multi-institutional National Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program were used to develop and validate a perioperative risk index to predict abdominal wound dehiscence after laparotomy.
METHODS: Perioperative data from 17,044 laparotomies resulting in 587 (3.4%) wound dehiscences performed at 132 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers between October 1, 1996, and September 30, 1998, were used to develop the model. Data from 17,763 laparotomies performed between October 1, 1998, and September 30, 2000, resulting in 562 (3.2%) dehiscences were used to validate the model. Models were developed using multivariable stepwise logistic regression with preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables entered sequentially as independent predictors of wound dehiscence. The model was used to create a scoring system, designated the abdominal wound dehiscence risk index.
RESULTS: Factors contributing significantly to the model and their point values (in parentheses) for the risk index include CVA with no residual deficit (4), history of COPD (4), current pneumonia (4), emergency procedure (6), operative time greater than 2.5 h (2), PGY 4 level resident as surgeon (3), clean wound classification (-3), superficial (5), or deep (17) wound infection, failure to wean from the ventilator (6), one or more complications other than dehiscence (7), and return to OR during admission (-11). Scores of 11-14 are predictive of 5% risk of dehiscence while scores of >14 predict 10% risk.
CONCLUSIONS: This abdominal wound dehiscence risk index identifies patients at risk for dehiscence and may be useful in guiding perioperative management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12643854     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4804(02)00097-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  27 in total

Review 1.  "Acute postoperative open abdominal wall": Nosological concept and treatment implications.

Authors:  Manuel López-Cano; José A Pereira; Manuel Armengol-Carrasco
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-27

2.  A New Method for Surgical Abdominal Mass Closure After Abdominal Fascial Dehiscence Using Nasogastric Tube and Hemovac Perforator: A Case-Series Study.

Authors:  Jalal Vahedian; Sepideh Jahanian; Behrouz Banivaheb; Nima Hemmati; Mehrnaz Ghavamipour; Majid Chegini; Mahdi Alemrajabi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Wound dehiscence: outcome comparison for sutured and mesh reconstructed patients.

Authors:  P Petersson; A Montgomery; U Petersson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Postoperative wound dehiscence: Predictors and associations.

Authors:  Victoria K Shanmugam; Stephen J Fernandez; Karen Kim Evans; Sean McNish; Anirban N Banerjee; Kara S Couch; Mihriye Mete; Nawar Shara
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.617

5.  Postoperative abdominal evisceration in children: possible risk factors.

Authors:  Murat Kemal Ciğdem; Abdurrahman Onen; Selçuk Otçu; Hatun Duran
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Morbidity and mortality following breast cancer surgery in women: national benchmarks for standards of care.

Authors:  Mahmoud B El-Tamer; B Marie Ward; Tracy Schifftner; Leigh Neumayer; Shukri Khuri; William Henderson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model.

Authors:  Gabriëlle H van Ramshorst; Jeroen Nieuwenhuizen; Wim C J Hop; Pauline Arends; Johan Boom; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Determining risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence: a literature review.

Authors:  Kylie Sandy-Hodgetts; Keryln Carville; Gavin D Leslie
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Incidence of wound dehiscence after colorectal cancer surgery: results from a national population-based register for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Harald Söderbäck; Ulf Gunnarsson; Anna Martling; Per Hellman; Gabriel Sandblom
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Effects of hypertension on abdominal wall healing: experimental study in rats.

Authors:  Jair Morais Tostes; André Luís Watanabe; Luís Massaro Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.