Literature DB >> 36123548

Scene-dependent, feedforward eye gaze metrics can differentiate technical skill levels of trainees in laparoscopic surgery.

Chaitanya S Kulkarni1, Shiyu Deng1, Tianzi Wang1, Jacob Hartman-Kenzler2, Laura E Barnes3, Sarah Henrickson Parker2, Shawn D Safford4, Nathan Lau5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In laparoscopic surgery, looking in the target areas is an indicator of proficiency. However, gaze behaviors revealing feedforward control (i.e., looking ahead) and their importance have been under-investigated in surgery. This study aims to establish the sensitivity and relative importance of different scene-dependent gaze and motion metrics for estimating trainee proficiency levels in surgical skills.
METHODS: Medical students performed the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery peg transfer task while recording their gaze on the monitor and tool activities inside the trainer box. Using computer vision and fixation algorithms, five scene-dependent gaze metrics and one tool speed metric were computed for 499 practice trials. Cluster analysis on the six metrics was used to group the trials into different clusters/proficiency levels, and ANOVAs were conducted to test differences between proficiency levels. A Random Forest model was trained to study metric importance at predicting proficiency levels.
RESULTS: Three clusters were identified, corresponding to three proficiency levels. The correspondence between the clusters and proficiency levels was confirmed by differences between completion times (F2,488 = 38.94, p < .001). Further, ANOVAs revealed significant differences between the three levels for all six metrics. The Random Forest model predicted proficiency level with 99% out-of-bag accuracy and revealed that scene-dependent gaze metrics reflecting feedforward behaviors were more important for prediction than the ones reflecting feedback behaviors.
CONCLUSION: Scene-dependent gaze metrics revealed skill levels of trainees more precisely than between experts and novices as suggested in the literature. Further, feedforward gaze metrics appeared to be more important than feedback ones at predicting proficiency.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer vision; Eye tracking; Laparoscopic surgery; Machine learning; Skill assessment; Surgical training

Year:  2022        PMID: 36123548     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09582-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  24 in total

Review 1.  Objective assessment of technical surgical skills.

Authors:  P D van Hove; G J M Tuijthof; E G G Verdaasdonk; L P S Stassen; J Dankelman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Development of a virtual reality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R Aggarwal; P Crochet; A Dias; A Misra; P Ziprin; A Darzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Decomposition and analysis of laparoscopic suturing task using tool-motion analysis (TMA): improving the objective assessment.

Authors:  J B Pagador; F M Sánchez-Margallo; L F Sánchez-Peralta; J A Sánchez-Margallo; J L Moyano-Cuevas; S Enciso-Sanz; J Usón-Gargallo; J Moreno
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin Zendejas; Raaj K Ruparel; David A Cook
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Is motion analysis a valid tool for assessing laparoscopic skill?

Authors:  John D Mason; James Ansell; Neil Warren; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Relevance of motion-related assessment metrics in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Ignacio Oropesa; Magdalena K Chmarra; Patricia Sánchez-González; Pablo Lamata; Sharon P Rodrigues; Silvia Enciso; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Frank-Willem Jansen; Jenny Dankelman; Enrique J Gómez
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  Objective assessment based on motion-related metrics and technical performance in laparoscopic suturing.

Authors:  Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Ignacio Oropesa; Silvia Enciso; Enrique J Gómez
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  EVA: laparoscopic instrument tracking based on Endoscopic Video Analysis for psychomotor skills assessment.

Authors:  Ignacio Oropesa; Patricia Sánchez-González; Magdalena K Chmarra; Pablo Lamata; Alvaro Fernández; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Frank Willem Jansen; Jenny Dankelman; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Enrique J Gómez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Objective classification of residents based on their psychomotor laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Magdalena K Chmarra; Stefan Klein; Joost C F de Winter; Frank-Willem Jansen; Jenny Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A review of eye tracking for understanding and improving diagnostic interpretation.

Authors:  Tad T Brunyé; Trafton Drew; Donald L Weaver; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2019-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.