Literature DB >> 36121581

Clinical Practice Guidelines on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Quality Appraisal Using the AGREE II Instrument.

Emma De Ravin1,2, Neeraj Suresh1, Dominic Romeo2, Joseph Lu3, Mitali Shah4, Giorgos Karakousis5, Alvaro Moreira6, Karthik Rajasekaran7,8.   

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure that is standard of care for the evaluation of clinically negative regional lymph nodes in patients with cutaneous melanoma. As the presence of metastases dictates patient prognosis and determines the need for further regional disease control or adjuvant therapy, SLNB is invaluable to clinical decision-making in patients presenting with melanoma. However, the indications for SLNB, specifically among patients with thin (<1 mm) or thick (>4 mm) melanomas, remain unclear. A number of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed outlining recommendations for the role of lymph node biopsy in the management of melanoma. However, to date, their quality has not been critically appraised. Our objective was to systematically evaluate all available CPGs on this topic using the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. Four total guidelines met the inclusion criteria and underwent appraisal. Only one CPG achieved a "high" quality rating, indicating scores of >60% in at least five of the six AGREE II domains. Across all CPGs, the lowest scoring domains were "Applicability" and "Stakeholder involvement," which had average scores of 41.2% and 48.3%, respectively. Based on the AGREE II instrument, the quality of existing CPGs for the indications of SLNB for melanoma is low. Future guidelines should be pilot tested to evaluate barriers to application and should utilize multidisciplinary guideline development teams that include patients and key stakeholders in addition to clinical experts from all relevant disciplines.
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36121581     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12525-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  11 in total

1.  Clinical value of the sentinel-node biopsy in primary cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Charles M Balch; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Management of Regional Lymph Nodes in Melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update Summary.

Authors:  Sandra L Wong; Erin B Kennedy; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Cutaneous head and neck melanoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.

Authors:  Gregory M Bricca; David G Brodland; Dianxu Ren; John A Zitelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Analysis of the factors and moderating role of self-care ability among patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Wenting Jiang; Lijun Chen
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.423

5.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

6.  Clinical practice guidelines in idiopathic facial paralysis: systematic review using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE II) instrument.

Authors:  Neil N Luu; Kevin T Chorath; Brandon R May; Nuvid Bhuiyan; Alvaro G Moreira; Karthik Rajasekaran
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 7.  Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: Systematic review of the current evidence on how users handle the 2 overall assessments.

Authors:  Wiebke Hoffmann-Eßer; Ulrich Siering; Edmund A M Neugebauer; Anne Catharina Brockhaus; Ulrike Lampert; Michaela Eikermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A critical appraisal of the quality of head and neck cancer imaging guidelines using the AGREE II tool: A EuroAIM initiative.

Authors:  Valeria Romeo; Arnaldo Stanzione; Sirio Cocozza; Lorenzo Ugga; Renato Cuocolo; Arturo Brunetti; Sotirios Bisdas
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Melanoma incidence, recurrence, and mortality in an integrated healthcare system: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Heather S Feigelson; John D Powers; Mayanka Kumar; Nikki M Carroll; Arun Pathy; Debra P Ritzwoller
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 10.  Critical review of clinical practice guidelines for evaluation of neck mass in adults.

Authors:  Kevin Chorath; Aman Prasad; Neil Luu; Beatrice Go; Alvaro Moreira; Karthik Rajasekaran
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.