Literature DB >> 3612137

Trochanteric advancement for recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.

S J Kaplan, W H Thomas, R Poss.   

Abstract

Twenty-one patients had trochanteric advancement after experiencing an average of 3.9 dislocations in a mean period of 46 weeks following total hip arthroplasty. Before trochanteric advancement was performed, component malposition and mechanical impingement were excluded as causes of dislocation. Radiographic measurements revealed that the trochanter was advanced an average of 16 +/- 7.7 mm (1 SD). Four patients, all with rheumatoid arthritis, had trochanteric migration greater than 1 cm. Seventeen of the 21 hips had no further dislocations following trochanteric advancement, with mean follow-up period of 2.7 years. Two patients dislocated because of extremes in hip position and had no further dislocations. Two patients dislocated who had trochanteric migration greater than 1 cm. Only one patients with a technically satisfactory trochanteric advancement continued to dislocate repeatedly. In patients without component malposition or obvious sources of impingement, trochanteric advancement is an effective and safe procedure for prevention of recurrent dislocations after total hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3612137     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(87)80018-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  14 in total

1.  Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability.

Authors:  Olivier Guyen; Vincent Pibarot; Gualter Vaz; Christophe Chevillotte; Jacques Béjui-Hugues
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Osteotomy of the greater trochanter: effect on gluteus medius function.

Authors:  Martin Beck; A Krüger; C Katthagen; S Kohl
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Instability after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Thomas E Brown
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-08-18

4.  Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads.

Authors:  Molly A Hartzler; Matthew P Abdel; Peter K Sculco; Michael J Taunton; Mark W Pagnano; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Total hip arthroplasty instability in Italy.

Authors:  Francesco Falez; Matteo Papalia; Fabio Favetti; Gabriele Panegrossi; Filippo Casella; Gianluca Mazzotta
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The unstable total hip replacement.

Authors:  F D'Angelo; L Murena; G Zatti; P Cherubino
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Computerized virtual surgery demonstrates where acetabular rim osteophytes most reduce range of motion following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sebastian Rodriguez-Elizalde; Alyssa M Yeager; Bheeshma Ravi; Joseph D Lipman; Eduardo A Salvati; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-07-26

8.  Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nathan G Wetters; Trevor G Murray; Mario Moric; Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Treatment of Recurrent Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Advanced Imaging and Three-Dimensional Modeling Techniques: A Case Series.

Authors:  Sean A Sutphen; Joseph D Lipman; Seth A Jerabek; David J Mayman; Christina I Esposito
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-07-25

10.  Secondary Hip Osteoarthritis due to Neurofibroma Treated with Total Hip Replacement.

Authors:  Suksan Tangsataporn; Alireza Shakib; Paul R Kuzyk; David J Backstein; Allan E Gross; Oleg A Safir
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2012-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.