| Literature DB >> 36120419 |
Peng Yuan1, Kun Yao1, Zhijiao Zhou2, Jianye Liu1, Chao Li1, Weibin Hou1, Yongxiang Tang3, Shuo Hu3, Long Wang1.
Abstract
Background: Inguinal lymphadenectomy is of great significance in the management of penile cancer, which aims to mitigate the progression of lymph node metastasis. It is important to improve the efficiency of lymph node dissection and reduce surgical complications. Objective: To detail a novel technique for robotic bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy through the hypogastric subcutaneous approach by indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging, which promotes the identification and dissection of inguinal lymph nodes with considerable safety. Design setting and participants: Ten eligible penile cancer patients who underwent ICG fluorescence imaging-guided robotic bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy were prospectively enrolled (ICG group). Sixteen patients who underwent the surgery without ICG were retrospectively set as the control (non-ICG) group. Follow-up records for at least 12 mo were required. Surgical procedure: Inguinal lymphadenectomy was performed by the hypogastric subcutaneous approach. The ICG solution was subcutaneously injected into the prepuce at the beginning of surgery, and ICG fluorescence imaging-guided robotic-assisted bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy was conducted. Measurements: Clinical outcomes were collected. The primary study outcome measurement was the number of dissected inguinal lymph nodes. Results and limitations: The numbers of inguinal overall, superficial, and deep lymph nodes retrieved were all higher in the ICG than in the non-ICG group (p < 0.05). No patients had severe perioperative complications. No difference was found in the overall complication rate and 12-mo survival between two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: ICG fluorescence imaging-guided robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy via the hypogastric subcutaneous approach is feasible and safe for patients with penile cancer, which is beneficial for dissecting more inguinal lymph nodes with few surgical complications. Patient summary: We developed a promising indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided technique to perform robotic bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy on patients with penile cancer, which conduces to remove more inguinal lymph nodes with limited complications.Entities:
Keywords: Fluorescence imaging; Indocyanine green; Inguinal lymphadenectomy; Penile cancer
Year: 2022 PMID: 36120419 PMCID: PMC9478926 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.08.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci ISSN: 2666-1683
Fig. 1A schema of the study procedures of ICG fluorescence imaging–guided bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy. (A) Skin marks that were labeled in the preoperative preparation and placement of trocars. (B) Injection of ICG at the beginning of surgery and identification of lymph nodes (LNs) by ICG fluorescence imaging. (C) Intraoperative inguinal superficial and deep lymph node dissection, and preservation of branches of the great saphenous vein. (D) Evaluation of specimen in paraffin blocks by ICG fluorescence imaging as well as pathological analysis. ICG = indocyanine green.
Demographic and clinicopathological data of all patients included in the study
| ICG group | Non-ICG group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr), median (IQR) | 59 (51.5–65.8) | 57 (49–64) | 0.702 |
| BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR) | 23.5 (21.1–25.1) | 21.4 (20.3–25.2) | 0.595 |
| HPV infection, | 4 (40) | 6 (37.5) | 1.000 |
| Smoking status, | 0.878 | ||
| Never smoking, | 2 (20) | 5 (31.3) | |
| Give up smoking for half a year, | 3 (30) | 5 (31.3) | |
| Smoking, | 5 (50) | 6 (37.4) | |
| ASA score, | 0.228 | ||
| 1 | 5 (50) | 9 (56.2) | |
| 2 | 4 (40) | 5 (31.3) | |
| 3 | 1 (10) | 2 (12.5) | |
| Pathological stage of primary tumor, | 0.422 | ||
| T1 | 4 (40) | 7 (43.8) | |
| T2 | 4 (40) | 6 (37.5) | |
| T3 | 2 (20) | 3 (18.7) | |
| Clinical stage of nodes, | 0.226 | ||
| N0 | 5 (50) | 6 (37.5) | |
| N1 | 3 (30) | 6 (37.5) | |
| N2 | 2 (20) | 4 (25) |
ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI = body mass index; HPV= human papillomavirus; ICG = indocyanine green; IQR = interquartile range.
Fig. 2ICG fluorescence imaging–guided inguinal lymph node dissection. Exact location of inguinal (A) superficial and (B) deep lymph nodes. (C) Accurate assessment of the extent of tissue resection. ICG = indocyanine green.
Surgical and pathological characteristics of all patients included in the study
| ICG group | Non-ICG group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Operative time (min), median (IQR) | 99.5 (89.8–105.5) | 105.5 (95.75–113) | 0.454 |
| Operative blood loss (ml), median (IQR) | 70 (52.5–113.8) | 87.5 (52.5–108.8) | 0.756 |
| Amount of drain (ml), median (IQR) | 100 (80–287.5) | 110 (87.5–212.5) | 0.946 |
| Duration of drain (d), median (IQR) | 6 (4.8–7.8) | 7 (4–7.5) | 0.756 |
| Postoperative hospital stay (d), median (IQR) | 5.5 (4–6.5) | 6 (3.8–7.3) | 0.667 |
| Number of dissected bilateral lymph nodes, median (IQR) | |||
| Deep lymph nodes | 3 (2–3) | 1.5 (1–2) | 0.024 |
| Superficial lymph nodes | 26.5 (24.5–29.5) | 22 (18–25) | 0.004 |
| Total lymph nodes | 29.5 (27.3–32) | 25 (19–26) | 0.001 |
| Pathological stage of lymph nodes, | 0.668 | ||
| N0 | 8 (80) | 11 (68.8) | |
| N1 | 2 (20) | 5 (31.2) | |
| Deep lymph node metastasis, | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
ICG = indocyanine green; IQR = interquartile range.
Comparison of complications between the two groups in the study
| ICG group | Non-ICG group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-up time (mo), median (IQR) | 18.5 (15.3–21.8) | 28.5 (25.8–38.5) | |
| Classification, | 1.000 | ||
| None | 8 (80) | 12 (75) | |
| Wound infection | 1 (10) | 1 (6.25) | |
| Lymphorrhea | 1 (10) | 2 (12.5) | |
| Lymphocele | 0 | 1 (6.25) | |
| Clavien-Dindo classification, | 1.000 | ||
| None | 8 (80) | 12 (75) | |
| I | 1 (10) | 2 (12.5) | |
| II | 1 (10) | 1 (6.25) | |
| III | 0 | 1 (6.25) |
ICG = indocyanine green; IQR = interquartile range.
Comparison was not needed.