| Literature DB >> 36120404 |
Ervin Masita Dewi1,2, Sugondo Hadiyoso1,3, Tati Latifah Erawati Rajab Mengko1, Hasballah Zakaria1, Kastam Astami1.
Abstract
Background: Photoplethysmography (PPG) contains information about the health condition of the heart and blood vessels. Cardiovascular system modeling using PPG signal measurements can represent, analyze, and predict the cardiovascular system.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular system; Windkessel segmentation model; finger and toe photoplethysmography; photoplethysmography; stiffness index
Year: 2022 PMID: 36120404 PMCID: PMC9480512 DOI: 10.4103/jmss.jmss_101_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Signals Sens ISSN: 2228-7477
Figure 1The stages in feature extraction of Photoplethysmography signal
Figure 2Proposed vascular modeling process
Figure 3Recording fingertip and toe photoplethysmography signals using noninvasive vascular analyzer
Figure 4Fingertip photoplethysmography signal was taken by using noninvasive vascular analyzer
Figure 5Toes photoplethysmography signal was taken by using noninvasive vascular analyzer
Figure 6Sample morphology of photoplethysmography signal of healthy persons
Figure 7Forward and reflected waves on photoplethysmography signal
Figure 8(a) Three-element Windkessel model, (b) result of model simulation
Figure 9(a) Four segments Windkessel model, (b) result of model simulation
The equivalent table between electronic units and cardiovascular units
| Cardiovascular unit | Electronic parameter units |
|---|---|
| 0.01 ml/Pa | 1 µF (compliance - capacitance) |
| 1 Pa.s2/ml | 1 µH (inertia - inductor) |
| 1 Pa.s/ml | 1 k? (resistance - resistance) |
| Blood viscosity (μ) | 1050 kg/m3 |
| Blood density (ρ) | 0.0035 kg/m.s |
Vessel segmentation, vessel physiological specification, and RLC values
| Arterial segment number | Segment model | Anatomical components | Length l (cm) | Radius r (cm) | Thickness h (cm) | Modulus young E (dyn/cm) | R (?) | L (H) | C (µF) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fingertip | Radial and ulnar artery | 36.30 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 6.40 | 1.57k | 564.29 | 0.21 |
| 2 | Brachial artery | 20.80 | 0.32 | 0.06 | 4.00 | 202.15 | 152.83 | 1.37 | |
| 3 | Subclavian artery | 16.50 | 0.84 | 0.11 | 4.00 | 3.46 | 17.81 | 10.67 | |
| 4 | Abdominal | Torachid and abdominal aorta | 42.40 | 0.95 | 0.12 | 4.00 | 5.31 | 35.35 | 36.97 |
| 5 | Toe | Iliac | 20.20 | 0.36 | 0.06 | 4.00 | 122.56 | 117.27 | 1.80 |
| 6 | Femoral artery | 34.80 | 0.23 | 0.05 | 8.00 | 1.34k | 509.62 | 0.48 | |
| 7 | Tibial artery | 41.90 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 13.00 | 14.95k | 1.86k | 0.04 |
RLC - Resistance, Inductance, and Capacitance
Figure 10Seven-segment arterial vessel modeling with the three-element Windkessel model
Figure 11Windkessel segmentation simulation result
Photoplethysmography parameter of the measurement result of 10 healthy persons
| Age (years) | h (cm) | PPG parameter on fingertip | PPG parameter on toes | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| x (mV) | y (mV) | Dt (s) | AI | SI (cm/s) | x (mV) | y (mV) | Dt (s) | AI | SI (cm/s) | ||
| 36 | 173 | 2.45 | 1.04 | 0.36 | 0.42 | 466.67 | 0.88 | 0.07 | 0.63 | 0.07 | 274.60 |
| 64 | 152 | 3.85 | 1.76 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 330.43 | 3.68 | 0.24 | 0.50 | 0.06 | 304.00 |
| 45 | 152 | 4.62 | 1.33 | 0.43 | 0.29 | 346.51 | 1.23 | 0.06 | 0.72 | 0.05 | 211.11 |
| 43 | 154 | 3.89 | 2.31 | 0.42 | 0.59 | 369.05 | 0.83 | 0.05 | 0.53 | 0.05 | 290.57 |
| 41 | 142 | 5.94 | 0.26 | 0.58 | 0.04 | 262.07 | 0.62 | 0.05 | 0.66 | 0.07 | 215.15 |
| 33 | 149 | 2.58 | 1.14 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 423.68 | 1.01 | 0.13 | 0.42 | 0.13 | 354.76 |
| 62 | 155 | 3.12 | 1.36 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 480.56 | 1.55 | 0.04 | 0.58 | 0.02 | 267.24 |
| 50 | 161 | 3.47 | 1.28 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 586.21 | 2.15 | 0.07 | 0.61 | 0.03 | 263.93 |
| 48 | 168 | 5.16 | 1.57 | 0.43 | 0.3 | 330.23 | 0.41 | 0.03 | 0.67 | 0.07 | 250.75 |
| 40 | 170 | 5.46 | 2.41 | 0.37 | 0.44 | 416.22 | 0.67 | 0.04 | 0.67 | 0.05 | 253.73 |
| 46±10.22 | 158±10.06 | 4.05±1.21 | 1.45±0.62 | 0.41±0.08 | 0.38±0.15 | 401.16±93.67 | 1.30±0.98 | 0.08±0.06 | 0.60±0.09 | 0.06±0.03 | 268.58±42.06 |
PPG - Photoplethysmography; SD - Standard deviation; SI - Stiffness index; AI - Augmentation index; Dt - The time delay
Photoplethysmography parameter of the measurement result of 10 cardiac patients
| Patient | Age (years) | h (cm) | PPG parameter on fingertip | PPG parameter on toes | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| x (V) | y (V) | Dt (s) | AI | SI (cm/s) | x (V) | y (V) | Dt (s) | AI | SI (cm/s) | |||
| 1 | 47 | 154 | 1.85 | 0.61 | 0.37 | 0.33 | 481.08 | 0.76 | 0.22 | 0.46 | 0.29 | 334.78 |
| 2 | 45 | 178 | 2.82 | 1.40 | 0.21 | 0.50 | 757.14 | 4.81 | 0.56 | 0.41 | 0.11 | 434.15 |
| 3 | 58 | 149 | 2.64 | 0.71 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 402.70 | 2.93 | 0.36 | 0.48 | 0.12 | 310.42 |
| 4 | 48 | 159 | 2.98 | 1.96 | 0.29 | 0.66 | 531.03 | 3.01 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.15 | 305.77 |
| 5 | 51 | 150 | 2.54 | 2.56 | 0.20 | 1.01 | 850.00 | 2.72 | 0.55 | 0.46 | 0.20 | 326.09 |
| 6 | 55 | 170 | 3.26 | 1.03 | 0.22 | 0.32 | 772.73 | 3.8 | 0.61 | 0.42 | 0.16 | 404.76 |
| 7 | 51 | 167 | 3.41 | 2.05 | 0.36 | 0.60 | 416.67 | 1.49 | 0.18 | 0.52 | 0.12 | 321.15 |
| 8 | 38 | 148 | 5.76 | 1.87 | 0.23 | 0.32 | 726.09 | 1.53 | 0.27 | 0.56 | 0.17 | 264.29 |
| 9 | 56 | 159 | 3.55 | 2.93 | 0.32 | 0.83 | 462.50 | 1.20 | 0.16 | 0.43 | 0.13 | 369.77 |
| 10 | 33 | 170 | 8.04 | 3.25 | 0.27 | 0.40 | 588.89 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 0.43 | 0.22 | 395.35 |
| Mean | 48 | 160 | 3.69 | 1.84 | 0.28 | 0.52 | 598.88 | 2.32 | 0.36 | 0.47 | 0.17 | 346.65 |
| SD | 7.93 | 10.41 | 1.84 | 0.91 | 0.07 | 0.25 | 164.45 | 1.34 | 0.17 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 52.62 |
PPG - Photoplethysmography; SD - Standard deviation; SI – Stiffness index; AI - Augmentation index; Dt - The time delay
ANOVA test result
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Fingertip | ||
| Dt (s) | 14.4451 | 0.0013* |
| AI | 2.528 | 0.1293 |
| SI (cm/s) | 10.9148 | 0.0039* |
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Dt (s) | 15.3358 | 0.0010* |
| AI | 28.3002 | 0.0000* |
| SI (cm/s) | 13.4309 | 0.0017* |
*P<0.05. SI - Stiffness index; AI - Augmentation index; Dt - The time delay
Photoplethysmography signal comparison between healthy people and cardiac patients
Photoplethysmography parameter of the measurement result of 10 healthy persons
| PPG parameter | Fingertip | Toes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| PPG signal | Output model | Derror | PPG signal | Output model | Derror | |
| x (mV) | 4.05±1.2 | 4.69 | 1.3±0.9 | 7.48 | ||
| y (mV) | 1.45±0.6 | 1.87 | 0.08±0.06 | 0.52 | ||
| Dt (s) | 0.41±0.08 | 0.44 | 0.07 | 0.60±0.09 | 0.56 | 0.07 |
| AI | 0.38±0.15 | 0.40 | 0.05 | 0.06±0.03 | 0.07 | 0.16 |
| SI (cm/s) | 401±93 | 365.71 | 0.09 | 268±42 | 288.23 | 0.07 |
| h (cm) | 158±10 | 160 | 158±10 | 160 | ||
PPG - Photoplethysmography; SI - Stiffness index; AI - Augmentation index; Dt - The time delay
Photoplethysmography parameter of the measurement result of 10 patient
| PPG parameter | Fingertip | Toes | ||||
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPG signal | Output model | Derror | PPG signal | Output model | Derror | |
| x (mV) | 3.69±1.8 | 5.76 | 2.32±1.3 | 10.30 | ||
| y (mV) | 1.84±0.9 | 3.19 | 0.36±0.17 | 1.60 | ||
| Dt (s) | 0.28±0.07 | 0.26 | 0.07 | 0.47±0.05 | 0.46 | 0.02 |
| AI | 0.52±0.25 | 0.55 | 0.05 | 0.17±0.06 | 0.16 | 0.06 |
| SI (cm/s) | 598±164 | 608.01 | 0.02 | 346±52 | 345.46 | 0.00 |
| h (cm) | 160±10 | 160 | 160±10 | 160 | ||
PPG - Photoplethysmography; SI - Stiffness index; AI - Augmentation index; Dt - The time delay
Correlation between photoplethysmography signal and output model