Sanqiang Xu1, Man Fang1, Xiaokang Yan1. 1. School of Ceramic Art and Design Art, Jingdezhen University, Jingdezhen 333000, China.
Abstract
SiO2 ceramic parts with complex structures were formed by additive manufacturing technology via a light curing method combined with a heat treatment process. To reveal the influence mechanism of rheology and formability of SiO2 ceramic slurry, the microstructure, morphology, and properties of light-cured SiO2 ceramic samples were characterized by a viscosity test, thermogravimetric analysis (TG-DTG), X-ray diffraction (XRD), a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and a series of tests for physical properties (bending strength, mass burning rate, and densification). The results indicate that the main effect of the dispersant-type factor was more significant than the pH value. When the dispersant was ammonium polyacrylate (PMAA-NH4) with a content of 1.0 wt % and the pH value of the slurry system was 9, the viscosity of SiO2 ceramic slurry could be controlled to the lowest. It was also found that the sintering temperature in the experiment had no effect on the crystalline phase of SiO2 ceramics. When the sintering temperature was 1250 °C and the solid content was 65 vol %, the micromorphology of the samples was uniform. Under this condition, the bending strength of the sample reached 14.9 MPa and the densification was 76.43%.
SiO2 ceramic parts with complex structures were formed by additive manufacturing technology via a light curing method combined with a heat treatment process. To reveal the influence mechanism of rheology and formability of SiO2 ceramic slurry, the microstructure, morphology, and properties of light-cured SiO2 ceramic samples were characterized by a viscosity test, thermogravimetric analysis (TG-DTG), X-ray diffraction (XRD), a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and a series of tests for physical properties (bending strength, mass burning rate, and densification). The results indicate that the main effect of the dispersant-type factor was more significant than the pH value. When the dispersant was ammonium polyacrylate (PMAA-NH4) with a content of 1.0 wt % and the pH value of the slurry system was 9, the viscosity of SiO2 ceramic slurry could be controlled to the lowest. It was also found that the sintering temperature in the experiment had no effect on the crystalline phase of SiO2 ceramics. When the sintering temperature was 1250 °C and the solid content was 65 vol %, the micromorphology of the samples was uniform. Under this condition, the bending strength of the sample reached 14.9 MPa and the densification was 76.43%.
With the development of
high-performance ceramics, the engineering
field has higher and higher requirements for the structure and dimensional
accuracy of ceramic parts.[1−4] The traditional forming processes of ceramic parts
with complex structures, such as injection molding, dry pressing,
extrusion molding, and isostatic pressing, all need to use molds.[5−8] However, the mold manufacturing for complex parts has the disadvantages
of a long cycle, high costs, and low forming precision, which cannot
meet the requirements of mass production of parts. In addition, ceramic
products fabricated by the traditional forming process have problems
such as low density, low strength, poor uniformity, and large sintering
deformation, which makes it more difficult to process ceramic parts
with high precision and complex structures.[9,10] Therefore,
ceramic forming technology has always been one of the three key technologies
of high-tech ceramics.[11,12]In recent years, additive
manufacturing technology has developed
rapidly in the forming and manufacturing of complex ceramic parts.
Compared with traditional ceramic product forming methods, ceramic
additive manufacturing technology has the advantages of high forming
precision, no need of a mold, and low manufacturing costs,[13,14] which can realize hollow, thin-walled, and other complex structural
parts and has a wide application prospect in aerospace, automotive,
electronics, biomedicine, art consumption, and other fields.[15−17] Compared with metal and polymer materials, the application of ceramic
materials in additive manufacturing technology needs to be improved.[18,19] At present, there are several additive manufacturing technologies
reported that can be used for ceramic formation: laser selective sintering
(SLM),[20,21] fused deposition formation (FDM),[22,23] three-dimensional printing forming technology (3DP),[24] and inkjet printing forming technology.[25,26] However, these additive manufacturing technologies are faced with
a series of problems such as scarcity of materials, difficult allocation
of materials, complex post-processing, and high costs.[27,28] In order to avoid these problems, this work realized the forming
of SiO2 ceramic parts with complex structures through additive
manufacturing technology via a light curing method combined with a
heat treatment process, which can achieve the purpose of reducing
costs, saving raw materials, and shortening production cycles.To improve the mechanical properties of ceramic parts, the solid
content and density of the green body should be increased during the
forming process when the ceramic parts are prepared by ceramic additive
manufacturing technology via a light curing method. However, a high
solid content will increase the viscosity of the slurry system, which
will affect the forming quality. Therefore, how to prepare a ceramic
slurry system with low viscosity and high solid content is one of
the key problems to be solved.Several studies have shown that
adding dispersants in the preparation
of slurry can effectively improve the viscosity and fluidity of slurry
so as to obtain ceramic products with a high solid content and uniform
microstructure. It is found that scholars have done some fruitful
work on forming SiO2, Al2O3, ZrO2, Si3N4, and other ceramic materials.
Corcione et al.[29] studied the effect of
the shear rate on the viscosity of SiO2 ceramic slurry
and tested the effect of different sintering temperatures on the bulk
density of ceramics. The results show that the slurry viscosity at
a shear rate of 100 s–1 was lower than that at a
shear rate of 0 s–1. The bulk density of SiO2 ceramics sintered at 1250 °C was 1.65 g/cm3. Zhou et al.[30] analyzed the effect of
the dispersant on the viscosity of SiO2 ceramic slurry
and concluded that, when the content of the sodium polyacrylate dispersant
reached 0.3 wt %, a low-viscosity ceramic slurry could be prepared.
When the solid content was 50 vol %, the densification of sintered
ceramic samples could reach 62.45%. Their work shows that the properties
of sintered SiO2 ceramic products are related to the solid
content and the uniform dispersion of particles, and the solid content
and the uniform dispersion of particles are related to the viscosity
and fluidity of the ceramic slurry. Wozniak et al.[31] explored the effects of the SiO2 powder particle
size, solid content, temperature, and shear rate on the viscosity
of SiO2 ceramic slurry and prepared acrylate-based SiO2 ceramic slurry with a solid content of 60 vol %. These results
indicate that the rheological properties of SiO2 ceramic
slurry depended on the temperature, particle size, and solid content
of the slurry. Goswami et al.[32] explored
the effects of the content of dispersant trioctyl phosphate oxide,
solid content, and shear rate on the viscosity of Al2O3 slurry, the results of which exhibited that, when the shear
rate was 45 s–1, the viscosity of Al2O3 slurry containing 3 wt % dispersant and 25 vol % solid
phase content reached the lowest. With the increase of the solid content,
the viscosity of the slurry showed a Liu-type function relationship
with the solid content. In addition, it has been found that the ceramic
green part with a low solid content was prone to deformation, cracking,
and even collapse during de-binding and sintering.[33,34]To sum it up, the above studies have basically clarified the
various
influencing factors on the rheological properties and formability
of ceramic slurry and provided sufficient and powerful theoretical
and technological guidance for the light-curing forming process of
ceramics. However, these studies only focused on the influence of
a single factor on the convective denaturation and formability, ignoring
the strength of the influencing factors of the light-curing forming
ceramic process, and lacked the exploration of the interaction effect
between the influencing factors. In this work, to further reveal the
influence mechanism of the rheological properties and formability
of SiO2 ceramic slurry, the main effects and interaction
effects of the factors affecting the properties such as the viscosity,
bending strength, shrinkage, and mass burn rate were qualitatively
or quantitatively analyzed. In addition, thermogravimetric analysis
(TG-DTG), phase analysis (XRD), and micromorphology analysis (SEM)
were utilized to characterize the thermal properties, microstructure,
and morphology of the samples. The direct value of this work is the
fact that it can more systematically and accurately guide the additive
manufacturing process via a light curing method of ceramic materials
and can further lay a theoretical and practical foundation for the
wide promotion of high-quality, low-cost, and personalized ceramic
manufacturing technology in the future.
Materials and Experiments
The process
flow of manufacturing SiO2 ceramics by a
light curing method is shown as Figure . To explore the influence of dispersants on the rheological
properties of ceramic slurry, three dispersants were used in the experiment:
ammonium polymethacrylate (PMAA-NH4, nC4H9O2N), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, nC6H9NO), and hydroxypropyl cellulose
(HPC, C36H70O19). As shown in Figure a, for preparing
ceramic slurry, acrylic acid (C3H4O2) was selected as a monomer and SiO2 powders of 5 sizes
were used with sizes ranging from 1 to 9 μm. During the experiment,
acrylic acid and the dispersant were mixed in a certain proportion,
and then 1 wt % photoinitiator benzoin dimethyl ether (DMPA, C16H16O3) was added. After mixing, SiO2 powder was added and stirred for 1 h to prepare a uniform
ceramic slurry (Figure b). A viscometer (LVDV-II+ Pro, America) was utilized to measure
the visibility of the SiO2 ceramic slurry.
Figure 1
Process flow of manufacturing
SiO2 ceramics by a light
curing method: (a) experimental raw materials, (b) ceramic slurry
mixing process, (c) 3D model data of the part to be printed, (d) light
curing forming equipment, (e) heat treatment process, and (f) formed
ceramic samples.
Process flow of manufacturing
SiO2 ceramics by a light
curing method: (a) experimental raw materials, (b) ceramic slurry
mixing process, (c) 3D model data of the part to be printed, (d) light
curing forming equipment, (e) heat treatment process, and (f) formed
ceramic samples.The light-curing forming equipment used in the
experiment is illustrated
in Figure d, the main
structure of which includes a light source, slurry container, forming
platform, motor, and the 3D model software system externally connected.
Before forming, it is necessary to import the 3D model data of the
part to be printed into the control software of the forming equipment
(Figure c) and then
inject the prepared SiO2 ceramic slurry into the slurry
container. After adjusting the working parameters of the light-curing
forming equipment, it can be run to form the SiO2 ceramic
green part.Finally, the green part needs to be de-binded and
sintered (Figure e,f)
to produce SiO2 ceramic parts with good density and certain
mechanical strength
through a heat treatment process. In order to clarify the de-binding
mechanism of the green part, the SiO2 ceramic slurry was
analyzed by thermogravimetric analysis (TG-DTG, STA449F3, Germany).
Based on the previous experimental results of our work, the sintering
temperature was set at 1100–1250 °C to obtain the final
forming samples. To explore the evolution law of the formability of
ceramic samples, the bending strength, shrinkage, mass burn rate,
and density of SiO2 ceramic samples were characterized.
The phase of SiO2 ceramic samples was analyzed by an X-ray
diffractometer (XRD, Bruker AXS D8-Focus, Germany). In addition, the
micromorphology of samples was observed by a field emission scanning
electron microscope (FE-SEM, SU8010, Hitachi, Japan).
Results and Discussion
Rheological Analysis of Ceramic Slurry
The rheology of ceramic slurry is very important to the additive
manufacturing process of SiO2 ceramics. In the process
of light curing, it is necessary to ensure that the viscosity of ceramic
slurry is moderate, so the solid content cannot be too high. However,
in the later stage of high-temperature heat treatment, we hope to
increase the solid content as much as possible to inhibit the shrinkage
of the light-cured green body so as to improve the forming accuracy.
Therefore, it is necessary to balance the contradiction between the
viscosity of ceramic slurry and the solid content and prepare ceramic
slurry with a high solid content and moderate viscosity as much as
possible. It was verified by experiments that, in addition to the
solid content, the viscosity of ceramic slurry was also affected by
the type and content of dispersant, pH value, and particle size.
Dispersant Content
The addition
of dispersant can effectively reduce the viscosity of the ceramic
slurry system and can also realize the modification of SiO2 powder, which is conducive to the uniform dispersion of ceramic
particles in the slurry. Therefore, it is of great significance to
study the relationship between the characteristics of the dispersant
and the rheological properties of the ceramic slurry for the preparation
process of ceramic slurry.On the basis of unifying the variables
of other influencing factors, Figure shows the effect of different kinds of dispersants
on the viscosity of SiO2 slurry. It can be seen that the
initial viscosity of SiO2 slurry without a dispersant was
2257 mPa·s. With the increase of the dispersant content, the
viscosity of all slurry systems showed the characteristics of first
decreasing and then increasing. Additionally, the dispersant content
levels corresponding to the inflection points of viscosity changes
of different SiO2 slurry systems were basically approximately
1.0 wt %. Taking PMAA-NH4 as an example, when the content
of the dispersant was less than 1.0 wt % with the addition of a dispersant,
the interaction between the dispersant and particle surface effectively
prevented particle agglomeration, and the particles were easy to disperse
when stirring, resulting in the decrease of slurry viscosity. When
the content of the dispersant was 1.0 wt %, the viscosity of the slurry
was 300 mPa·s. At this time, the surface of SiO2 particles
reached a saturated adsorption state and the slurry system had good
fluidity. With the continuous addition of PMAA-NH4, the
ceramic particles were bridged by excess dispersant, resulting in
the agglomeration of SiO2 particles, which slightly increased
the viscosity of the slurry system.
Figure 2
Effect of the dispersant type and content
on the viscosity of the
slurry system: (a) PMAA-NH4, (b) HPC, (c) PVP, (d) 50 wt
% PMAA-NH4 + 50 wt % HPC, (e) 50 wt % PMAA-NH4 + 50 wt % PVP, and (f) 50 wt % HPC + 50 wt % PVP.
Effect of the dispersant type and content
on the viscosity of the
slurry system: (a) PMAA-NH4, (b) HPC, (c) PVP, (d) 50 wt
% PMAA-NH4 + 50 wt % HPC, (e) 50 wt % PMAA-NH4 + 50 wt % PVP, and (f) 50 wt % HPC + 50 wt % PVP.In order to optimize the preparation process of
ceramic slurry,
the effects of different dispersant types with the same dispersant
content on viscosity were compared and visualized, as shown in Figure . It can be found
that, under the same dispersant content, the viscosity value of the
PMAA-NH4 slurry system was the lowest. By comparing the
sizes of all data points in Figure , we could omit the link of viscosity change trend
analysis and directly find the best type and content of dispersant
(PMAA-NH4, 1.0 wt %) to quickly guide the preparation of
the SiO2 slurry system.
Figure 3
Visual image of the effect of different
dispersants on viscosity.
Visual image of the effect of different
dispersants on viscosity.
pH Value
The concentration of H+ in the slurry affects the electrostatic stability of the
dispersant.[35] When the concentration of
H+ in ceramic slurry is too low, the dispersant cannot
play a role in electrostatic stability. With the increase of the H+ concentration, the viscosity of the slurry would gradually
decrease, the ceramic particles in the slurry can achieve the effect
of stable dispersion, and the stability of the slurry system would
be enhanced. This is because the dispersant can play an electrostatic
stabilizing role in the slurry in an appropriate amount of a H+ concentration environment. Figure exhibits the variation of viscosity of SiO2 ceramic slurry (dispersant content was 1.0 wt %) with different
pH values. It can be judged that the viscosity of ceramic slurry first
decreased and then increased with the increase of the pH value. When
the pH value of the ceramic slurry system was 8–9, the slurry
viscosity had a minimum value and the slurry fluidity was good at
this time.
Figure 4
Effect of the pH value on ceramic slurry: (a) PMAA-NH4, (b) HPC,
(c) PVP, (d) 50 wt % PMAA-NH4 + 50 wt % HPC, (e) 50 wt % PMAA-NH4
+ 50 wt % PVP, and (f) 50 wt % HPC + 50 wt % PVP.
Effect of the pH value on ceramic slurry: (a) PMAA-NH4, (b) HPC,
(c) PVP, (d) 50 wt % PMAA-NH4 + 50 wt % HPC, (e) 50 wt % PMAA-NH4
+ 50 wt % PVP, and (f) 50 wt % HPC + 50 wt % PVP.From Figure a,
compared with other types of dispersants, the viscosity of the ceramic
slurry system with PMAA-NH4 added had the largest fluctuation
(standard deviation) with the pH value. This is because the electrolysis
degree of PMAA-NH4 was more affected by the pH value. It
was difficult to ionize under acidic conditions. In an alkaline environment,
PMAA-NH4 could be completely ionized. At this time, the
ceramic slurry relied on the electrostatic potential resistance stabilization
mechanism to achieve stable dispersion. When the pH value of the ceramic
slurry was further increased, the ionized PMAA-NH4 had
a repulsive effect with the negatively charged ceramic particle surface,
which was not easy to adsorb, resulting in the agglomeration of SiO2 ceramic particles and the slow increase of the slurry viscosity.
Figure 5
Main-effect
analysis of the pH value and dispersant: (a) standard
deviation of viscosity changing with the pH value and (b) visual analysis
of main effects.
Main-effect
analysis of the pH value and dispersant: (a) standard
deviation of viscosity changing with the pH value and (b) visual analysis
of main effects.In order to intuitively judge the main effect of
the pH value and
dispersant type on the viscosity of the slurry system, a 3D histogram
was applied to exhibit this effect (Figure b). Obviously, compared with the type of
dispersant, the effect of pH on the viscosity of the slurry system
was much smaller, so the main effect of the dispersant was more significant.
By calculating the viscosity data difference between the dispersant
factor and pH factor at high and low levels, it can be found that
the interaction effect between the pH value and dispersant type was
not significant.
Particle Size and Solid Content
The particle size of ceramic powder is an important factor affecting
the light-curing formability and sintering performance of ceramics.
The surface energy of ceramic powder increases with the decrease of
particle size. Therefore, the smaller the particle size of ceramic
powder is, the fuller the solid-phase reaction between powders will
be, which is more beneficial to the sintering process. However, the
smaller the particle size of the powder is, the greater the flow resistance
of the slurry will be, and the ceramic powder in the slurry will be
easy to agglomerate, resulting in the increase of viscosity and poor
fluidity of the slurry. For ceramic additive manufacturing technology,
it is very important to control the solid content and viscosity of
ceramic slurry.To explore the relationship between the SiO2 particle size, solid content, and rheological properties
of the slurry system, the viscosity of ceramic slurry (1.0 wt % PMAA-NH4, pH = 9) with different SiO2 powder particle sizes
was characterized, as shown in Figure (the water droplets in the figure represent the liquid
content). It can be seen that there was a negative correlation between
the viscosity of ceramic slurry and the particle size of ceramic powder
under different solid content amounts. This is because, for the SiO2 slurry system with a large particle size, the number of SiO2 particles per unit volume was less and the interaction between
particles was weak, so the slurry viscosity was small. However, in
the forming process, the size of particles should not be too large
because the gap between particles will cause great shrinkage in later
sintering. From Figure d (the solid content was 55 vol %), when the ceramic particle size
exceeded 5 μm, the viscosity of the slurry no longer decreased
significantly.
Figure 6
Effect of SiO2 powder particle size on the
viscosity
of ceramic slurry (1.0 wt % PMAA-NH4, pH = 9): (a) 40 vol
% solid content, (b) 45 vol % solid content, (c) 50 vol % solid content,
and (d) 55 vol % solid content.
Effect of SiO2 powder particle size on the
viscosity
of ceramic slurry (1.0 wt % PMAA-NH4, pH = 9): (a) 40 vol
% solid content, (b) 45 vol % solid content, (c) 50 vol % solid content,
and (d) 55 vol % solid content.According to the rheological theory, the viscosity
of the slurry
system increases with the increase of the solid volume fraction in
the slurry. For exploring the main effect and interaction effect of
the two factors solid content and SiO2 particle size, the
viscosity of the slurry system, under different SiO2 powder
particle sizes and different solid content amounts, was visually measured
(Figure ). From Figure a, there was almost
no interaction effect between the particle size of SiO2 powder and the solid content. From the statistical data of standard
deviation (Figure b), it can be found that, compared with the particle size factor,
the viscosity of SiO2 slurry fluctuated more with the change
of solid content, so its main effect was more significant.
Figure 7
Main effect
and interaction effect analysis of the SiO2 powder particle
size and solid content: (a) visualization of the
main effect and interaction effect and (b) standard deviation of viscosity
fluctuation.
Main effect
and interaction effect analysis of the SiO2 powder particle
size and solid content: (a) visualization of the
main effect and interaction effect and (b) standard deviation of viscosity
fluctuation.
Thermal Properties of SiO2 Ceramic
Slurry
According to the expected 3D part model, the green
part was obtained from SiO2 slurry after the light-curing
forming process, and its mechanical properties were poor. To form
ceramic parts with high mechanical properties, the green part first
needs to go through the de-binding process. De-binding refers to the
removal of parts other than the solid content in the ceramic slurry
system by a thermal de-binding[36−38] or solvent de-binding method.[39,40] De-binding of the green part is the longest time-consuming step
in the process of additive manufacturing via the light-curing method
of ceramic materials, and various defects such as cracking, delamination,
deformation, and collapse easily appear in this process, which affects
the integrity of products and reduces the mechanical properties of
materials. Therefore, the de-binding process is the key step in the
forming process of SiO2 ceramic products. After the de-binding
process is completed, high-temperature sintering is required to promote
the densification of SiO2 powder. In this work, in order
to simplify the operation and consider environmental protection, the
method of integrating de-binding and sintering was adopted.The key control point of the integrated process of de-binding and
sintering is the control of temperature, so it is necessary to clarify
the thermal properties of the SiO2 ceramic slurry. Figure a shows the TG-DTG
results of the green part of SiO2 ceramics. The green part
lost weight slightly at 25–300 °C, which was caused by
the evaporation of water and small molecular organics, but the temperature
had not yet reached the decomposition conditions of organics. At 300–450
°C, the photosensitive resin in the green part began to decompose,
and the thermal weight loss was intense. After heating to 500 °C,
the weight loss rate tended to be stable, and the resin was completely
decomposed at this time; only the solid SiO2 component
was retained.
Figure 8
Thermal properties of SiO2 ceramic slurry:
(a) TG-DTG
results of the SiO2 ceramic green part and (b) thermal
de-binding process control route of the SiO2 ceramic green
part.
Thermal properties of SiO2 ceramic slurry:
(a) TG-DTG
results of the SiO2 ceramic green part and (b) thermal
de-binding process control route of the SiO2 ceramic green
part.Based on the thermal weight loss law of SiO2 slurry,
the thermal de-binding process control route of the SiO2 ceramic green part was formulated, as shown in Figure b. The temperature was set
in the following four stages: (i) heating from room temperature to
100 °C at a heating rate of 1.25 °C/min and holding for
60 min to ensure that the water in the green part was fully discharged,
(ii) raising the temperature from 100 to 310 °C at a heating
rate of 1 °C/min and keeping the temperature for 60 min to ensure
the full volatilization of small molecular organics in the green part,
(III) heating up from 310 to 520 °C at a heating rate of 0.5
°C/min and keeping the temperature for 120 min to ensure the
gradual advancement of the thermal decomposition process of photosensitive
resin, and (IV) heating up from 500 to 600 °C at a heating rate
of 0.5 °C/min and holding for 60 min to ensure that the thermal
decomposition process of photosensitive resin was fully carried out.Sintering is a process of grain growth and densification of ceramic
green parts after de-binding under high temperatures. With the increase
of temperature, the particles in the green part of ceramics continued
to migrate, resulting in the movement of grain boundaries and the
gradual elimination of pores. In this process, the green body would
shrink and eventually form into ceramic products with high compactness
and certain mechanical strength.
Formability of SiO2 Ceramics Formed
by the Light Curing Method
The formability of SiO2 ceramics formed by additive manufacturing via the light curing method
can be characterized by the bending strength, shrinkage, mass burning
loss, rate and densification, which has a strong correlation with
the sintering temperature and solid content. In this work, the relationship
between formability and sintering temperature (1100, 1150, 1200, and
1250 °C) and solid content (50, 55, 60, and 65 vol %) was quantitatively
discussed, and the microstructure and morphology of rectangular SiO2 ceramics (50 × 15 × 5 mm) formed under different
conditions were also explored.
Bending Strength
The calculation
method of the bending strength can be summarized as eq (σf: bending strength
(MPa), L: span under fixture (mm), b: specimen width (mm), d: sample thickness (mm),
and F: maximum load (N)). The bending strength test
results of SiO2 ceramics at different sintering temperatures
are illustrated in Figure a. It can be seen from the thermal diagram that the bending
strength of SiO2 ceramics was positively correlated with
the sintering temperature and solid content. When the solid content
was 65 vol % and the sintering temperature was 1200–1250 °C,
the bending strength had a maximum value of 14.9 MPa. From Figure b, under different
solid content amounts, the bending strength exhibited a law that first
gradually increased and then tended to stabilize with the change of
temperature.
Figure 9
Analysis of SiO2 ceramic sample formability: (a) thermal
diagram of the bending strength, (b) bending strength at different
sintering temperatures, (c) thermal diagram of the shrinkage rate;
(d) shrinkage rate at different sintering temperatures, (e) thermal
diagram of the mass burning rate, (f) mass burning rate at different
sintering temperatures, (g) thermal diagram of densification, and
(h) densification at different sintering temperatures.
Analysis of SiO2 ceramic sample formability: (a) thermal
diagram of the bending strength, (b) bending strength at different
sintering temperatures, (c) thermal diagram of the shrinkage rate;
(d) shrinkage rate at different sintering temperatures, (e) thermal
diagram of the mass burning rate, (f) mass burning rate at different
sintering temperatures, (g) thermal diagram of densification, and
(h) densification at different sintering temperatures.By analyzing the difference of bending strengths
between high levels
(65 vol %, 1250 °C) and low levels (50 vol %, 1100 °C) of
the temperature and solid content, the main effect and interaction
effect could be calculated according to eqs and 3, respectively
(Ymain: main effect of factors, Y̅1: average value of the low level of
factors, Y̅2: average value of the
high level of factors, Yinteraction: interaction
of factors, Y̅3: interaction of
low level of factors, and Y̅4: interaction
of high level of factors). The main effect of the temperature factor
was 5.81 MPa. The main effect of the solid content factor was 2.94
MPa. The interaction effect between the temperature factor and solid
content factor was −1.7 MPa. Therefore, the main effect of
the temperature factor was more significant and had a greater impact
on the bending strength of ceramics. Additionally, there was a weak
interaction between the temperature and solid content, which means
that the effect of temperature on the bending strength also slightly
depended on the solid content.From the mechanism
analysis, the reason for the above rule was
that, with the increase of sintering temperature, the grains began
to grow slowly and gather together, and the binding force between
the particles was enhanced. At the same time, pores were discharged
from the interior of the ceramic sample at a high temperature, so
the bending strength of the SiO2 ceramic material was improved.
Shrinkage and Mass Burning Rate
The shrinkage rate had been defined as the linear shrinkage rate
in a single direction according to the provisions of relevant Chinese
industry standards (HB5353.2-2004, China). From Figure c, the shrinkage of SiO2 ceramics
was positively correlated with the temperature and negatively correlated
with solid content. When the sintering temperature was 1250 °C
and the solid content was 65 vol %, the shrinkage was 0.96%. As shown
in Figure d, under
different solid content amounts, the shrinkage of SiO2 ceramics
exhibits a slow-increase law with the change of temperature. Referring
to the above analysis method of bending strength, it was calculated
that the main effect of the temperature factor on the shrinkage of
SiO2 ceramics was 0.59%, the main effect of the solid content
factor was −2.09%, and the interaction effect between the temperature
factor and solid content factor was 0.42%. Therefore, the main effect
of the solid content factor was more significant, which was the core
factor affecting the shrinkage of ceramics, and the interaction effect
between the temperature and solid content could be ignored, which
is because of the fact that, after increasing the solid content, the
solid particles in the slurry formed colloidal particles under the
adsorption of the polymer. At the same time, due to the effect of
electrostatic repulsion, the colloidal particles occupied all the
space of the slurry to the greatest extent, so the shrinkage would
also be reduced.Similarly, it can be found from Figure e that the mass burning rate
of SiO2 ceramics was positively correlated with the temperature
and negatively correlated with solid content. When the sintering temperature
was 1250 °C, and the solid content was 65 vol %, the mass burning
rate was 22.37%. From Figure f, under different solid content amounts, the fluctuation
of the mass burning rate changed little with temperature. It was calculated
that the main effect of the temperature factor on the mass burning
rate was 0.60%, the main effect of solid content factor was −1.48%,
and the interaction effect between the temperature factor and solid
content factor was 0.56%, which indicates that the main effect of
the solid content factor was more significant and had a greater impact
on the mass burning rate of ceramics. In addition, there was a certain
interaction between the temperature and solid content, which means
that the effect of solid content on the mass burning rate also depended
on the temperature.
Densification
Densification was
defined as the ratio of measured density to theoretical density (2.66
g/cm3) of SiO2 ceramic samples. The relationship
between density and the sintering temperature is illustrated in Figure g,h. It can be found
that the densification of SiO2 ceramics was positively
correlated with the temperature and solid content. When the sintering
temperature was 1250 °C and the solid content was 65 vol %, the
densification of SiO2 ceramics reached 76.43%. The main
effect of the temperature factor on the densification was 1.93%, the
main effect of the solid content factor was 1.34%, and the interaction
effect between the temperature factor and solid content factor was
0.09%. Therefore, the main effects of the solid content and sintering
temperature were both significant, which were the main factors affecting
the shrinkage of ceramics. Additionally, the interaction effect between
the temperature and solid content could be ignored. The reason for
the above results is that, with the increase of the solid content
and sintering temperature, the grains grew and gathered together,
and the pores were continuously discharged from the matrix, thus improving
the compactness of ceramics.
Phase Analysis by XRD
XRD patterns
of SiO2 ceramics under different sintering temperatures
are shown in Figure from which it can be judged that the sintering temperature selected
in the experiment had no effect on the type of crystalline phase of
SiO2 ceramics, and there was cristobalite in each SiO2 ceramic sample. With the increase of the sintering temperature,
the peak value of cristobalite increased slightly, indicating that
the content of cristobalite increased. Under the same SiO2 powder size and sintering temperature, it is believed that the solid
content had little effect on the microstructure and composition of
SiO2 ceramics after sintering.
Figure 10
XRD pattern of SiO2 ceramics: (a) 1100 °C, (b)
1150 °C, (c) 1200 °C, (d) 1250 °C, and (e) SiO2 powders at room temperature.
XRD pattern of SiO2 ceramics: (a) 1100 °C, (b)
1150 °C, (c) 1200 °C, (d) 1250 °C, and (e) SiO2 powders at room temperature.
Micromorphology Analysis by SEM
To analyze the influence mechanism of the sintering temperature and
solid content on the formability more microcosmically, the micromorphology
of the three-dimensional profile of SiO2 ceramics formed
under different conditions was characterized by SEM, as shown in Figure . The z-axis direction in the figure is the translation direction of the
ceramic liquid level during the process of light-curing forming.
Figure 11
SEM
images of ceramic samples: (a) influence of the sintering temperature
and (b) influence of solid content.
SEM
images of ceramic samples: (a) influence of the sintering temperature
and (b) influence of solid content.From Figure a
(the solid content of 65 vol %), when the sintering temperature was
1100–1150 °C, there were several pores in the ceramic
sample. In addition, the micromorphology of the x–y plane was more uniform than that of the y–z plane, which indicates that
the sintering was not sufficient, and due to the influence of forming
accuracy, the sintering bonding degree between layers needed to be
improved. When the temperature was increased to 1200 °C, with
the gradual growth of grains, the pores of x–y and y–z planes
were greatly reduced and the uniformity of the micromorphology of y–z planes was greatly improved.
Further increasing the temperature to 1250 °C, the micromorphology
of x–y and y–z planes was very uniform, and the density
was good.With the sintering temperature selected as 1250 °C, Figure b exhibits the
three-dimensional sectional SEM image of SiO2 ceramics
under different solid content amounts. When the solid content was
50 vol %, many grains could be seen in the sample, but there was a
certain amount of pores. Comparing x–y and y–z planes,
the difference of micromorphology was not obvious. When the solid
content was increased to 55–60 vol %, the grains gradually
grew uniformly and the pores were greatly reduced. When the solid
content was further increased to 65 vol %, the micromorphology of
the sample was uniform and the compactness was high, and there were
almost no pores, indicating that the increase of solid content contributed
to improve the compactness of SiO2 ceramics. The analysis
results of SEM also verified the change rules of bending strength,
shrinkage, and densification in the above chapters.
Forming of SiO2 Ceramic Parts
with Complex Structures
Based on the above research results,
PMAA-NH4 with a content of 1.0 wt % was selected to prepare
SiO2 ceramic slurry with a solid content of 65 vol %. After
de-binding at 600 °C and sintering at 1250 °C, SiO2 ceramic parts with complex structures were formed (Figure a), and their densification
was 76.38% (Figure b).
Figure 12
Forming performance of the SiO2 ceramic sample: (a)
formed SiO2 sample and (b) densification.
Forming performance of the SiO2 ceramic sample: (a)
formed SiO2 sample and (b) densification.
Conclusions
In this work, the influence
mechanism of rheology and formability
of SiO2 ceramic slurry based on additive manufacturing
technology via a light-curing method was explored, and the microstructure,
morphology, and properties of SiO2 ceramic samples were
characterized. The research conclusions are summarized as follows:For the viscosity of the ceramic slurry,
the main effect of the dispersant type was more significant than the
pH value, and the interaction effect between the pH value and dispersant
type was not significant. Under the same conditions (powder particle
size and solid content), when the dispersant PMAA-NH4 was
selected with content of 1.0 wt % and the pH value was controlled
to 9, the viscosity of slurry could be controlled to the lowest.Compared with the particle
size factor,
the viscosity of SiO2 slurry fluctuated more with the change
of solid content, and its main effect was more significant. When the
solid content was 55 vol %, the ceramic particle size exceeded 5 μm
and the viscosity of the slurry no longer decreased significantly.The temperature factor
had a greater
influence on the bending strength of ceramics, and there was a weak
interaction between the temperature and solid content. The solid content
factor was the core factor affecting the shrinkage and mass burning
rate. In addition, the effect of solid content on the mass burning
rate also depended on the temperature. For the densification, the
solid content and sintering temperature were both the key factors
affecting the shrinkage.XRD results indicated that the sintering
temperature in the experiment had no effect on the crystalline phase
of SiO2 ceramics. When the sintering temperature was 1250
°C and the solid content was 65 vol %, the SEM image exhibited
that the micromorphology of the ceramic sample was uniform and the
density was good. The bending strength of the sample corresponding
to this condition reached 14.9 MPa, and the densification was 76.43%.