| Literature DB >> 35517016 |
Masashi Kotobuki1,2, Houhua Lei3, Yu Chen2,4, Shufeng Song5, Chaohe Xu5, Ning Hu5, Janina Molenda6, Li Lu1,2.
Abstract
The thickness of a solid electrolyte influences the performance of all-solid-state batteries due to increased impedance with a thick electrolyte. Thin solid electrolytes are favourable to improve the performance of all-solid-state batteries due to the short Li ion diffusion path and small volume of the solid electrolytes. Therefore, the preparation of thin solid electrolyte is one of the key process techniques for development of all-solid-state batteries. In this study, thin Li1.5Ge1.5Al0.5(PO4)3 solid electrolyte with a Na super ion conductor structure is prepared by diamond wire slicing. The Li1.5Ge1.5Al0.5(PO4)3 solid electrolyte is prepared by melt-quenching followed by crystallization at 800 °C for 8 h, after which the crystallized Li1.5Ge1.5Al0.5(PO4)3 rod is subjected to wire slicing. Thin Li1.5Ge1.5Al0.5(PO4)3 with a thickness of 200 μm is obtained. The crystal structure and cross-sectional morphology are not affected by the slicing. The total Li conductivity of the thin Li1.5Ge1.5Al0.5(PO4)3 and activation energy are 3.3 × 10-4 S cm-1 and 0.32 eV, respectively. The thickness and total conductivity are comparable to those of Li1.5Ge1.5Al0.5(PO4)3 prepared by the tape-casting method which needs several steps to prepare Li1.5Ge1.5Al0.5(PO4)3 tape-sheet and high temperature and a long sintering process. The ionic transference number of the thin Li1.5Ge1.5Al0.5(PO4)3 is 0.999. The diamond wire slicing is a useful method to prepare thin solid electrolytes. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35517016 PMCID: PMC9063516 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra00711c
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1Performances of all-solid-state batteries with (a) thick and (b) thin solid electrolytes.
Fig. 2A scheme of preparation of thin LAGP by the diamond wire slicing.
Fig. 3Photos and dimensions of (a–c) sample 1 and (d–f) sample 2.
Fig. 4(a) XRD patterns of sample 1 and sample 2, (b) cross-sectional SEM images of (1 and 2) sample 1 and (3 and 4) sample 2.
Lattice parameters of thin LAGP prepared by mechanical slicinga
| Sample |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Thick LAGP | 8.262 | 20.656 | 1221.0 |
| Sample 1 | 8.265 | 20.619 | 1219.8 |
| Sample 2 | 8.255 | 20.624 | 1217.0 |
Ref. 26.
Fig. 5Schematic illustration on difference of sample morphologies in the history of processing.
Fig. 6Complex impedance plots of (a) sample 1 and (b) sample 2 measured at 28 °C in a voltage signal of 10 mV.
Fig. 7A comparison of experimental procedures of (a) diamond wire slicing and (b) tape-casting methods.[22]
Fig. 8(a) Arrhenius plot of total Li ion conductivity of sample 1 and (b) chronoamperometric curve of the sample 1 measured at an applied voltage of 1 V.