Literature DB >> 36119403

Integrating women's voices in quality improvement for maternity care: A qualitative study.

Evelien Cellissen1, Maaike Vogels-Broeke1, Irene Korstjens1, Marianne Nieuwenhuijze1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Improving the quality of maternity care is high on the national agenda in the Netherlands. One aspect gaining significant attention is integrating women's experiences - as users of maternity care - in this quality improvement. The aim of this study was to gain deeper insights into how maternity care professionals in Dutch Maternity Care Collaborations integrate women's voices into quality improvement as part of integrated maternity care and what role midwives can have in this.
METHODS: This was a descriptive qualitative study, using semi-structured individual interviews and content analysis for an in-depth exploration of maternity care professionals' experiences and opinions on integrating women's voices in quality improvement. Participants were twelve maternity care professionals involved in quality improvement activities from eight Dutch Maternity Care Collaborations.
RESULTS: Four themes emerged: 'Quality improvement based on women's voices is still in its infancy' and was experienced as an important but challenging topic; 'Collecting women's voices' was conducted, but needed more facilitation; Using women's voices' was hindered by a lack of expertise and a structured feedback and feedforward system; and 'Ensuring listening to women's voices' and integrating them in quality improvement required further facilitation.
CONCLUSIONS: Care professionals emphasized that listening to women's voices for quality improvement is important but challenging due to the lack of expertise, organizational structure, time, and financial resources. A feasible implementation strategy including concrete support is recommended by maternity care professionals to boost action.
© 2022 Cellissen E. et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  healthcare quality improvement; maternity care; patient experience; qualitative research; woman-centered care

Year:  2022        PMID: 36119403      PMCID: PMC9442975          DOI: 10.18332/ejm/152253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Midwifery        ISSN: 2585-2906


  22 in total

1.  Using client experiences for quality improvement in long-term care organizations.

Authors:  Marloes Zuidgeest; Mathilde Strating; Katrien Luijkx; Gert Westert; Diana Delnoij; En Diana Delnoij
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  The qualitative content analysis process.

Authors:  Satu Elo; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Collecting data on patient experience is not enough: they must be used to improve care.

Authors:  Angela Coulter; Louise Locock; Sue Ziebland; Joe Calabrese
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-03-26

Review 4.  To what extent does UK and Irish maternity policy and guidance address integration of services to meet needs of women with comorbidity? A policy document review.

Authors:  Felicity Mayer; Debra Bick; Cath Taylor
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.372

5.  Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R).

Authors:  Caroline J Hollins Martin; Colin R Martin
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.372

Review 6.  Tools and methods for quality improvement and patient safety in perinatal care.

Authors:  Amy T Nathan; Heather C Kaplan
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 7.  What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review.

Authors:  Soo Downe; Kenneth Finlayson; Olufemi T Oladapo; Mercedes Bonet; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Motivating Change: a grounded theory of how to achieve large-scale, sustained change, co-created with improvement organisations across the UK.

Authors:  Jenna P Breckenridge; Nicola Gray; Madalina Toma; Sue Ashmore; Ruth Glassborow; Cameron Stark; Mary J Renfrew
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-06-14

9.  Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; G Ross Baker; Elaina Orlando; Carol Fancott; Pooja Bhatia; Selina Casalino; Kanecy Onate; Jean-Louis Denis; Marie-Pascale Pomey
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing.

Authors:  Irene Korstjens; Albine Moser
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.