| Literature DB >> 36119139 |
Kyung-Ah Park1, Hee Kyung Yang2, Jinu Han3, Seong-Joon Kim4, Sung Eun Park5, Haeng-Jin Lee6, Sueng-Han Han5, Sei Yeul Oh1, Jeong-Min Hwang2.
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the clinical characteristics and prognosis of optic neuritis (ON) in pediatric patients aged <19 years in South Korea.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36119139 PMCID: PMC9473900 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4281772
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmol ISSN: 2090-004X Impact factor: 1.974
Figure 1Age distribution of pediatric patients with optic neuritis at presentation.
Clinical demographics of patients with pediatric onset optic neuritis.
| Numbers (total) | %, or SD (IQR) | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 127 | 100% |
| Sex (female) | 79 | 62.2% |
|
| ||
| Age at onset (years) | ||
| 3–6 | 29 | 22.8% |
| 7–9 | 32 | 25.2% |
| 10–12 | 23 | 18.1% |
| ≥13 | 43 | 33.9% |
| Mean (median) | 10.7 (10.3) | 4.1 (7.3–14.2) |
|
| ||
| Bilaterality | 53 (127) | 41.7% |
| Pain with eye movement | 51 (108) | 47.2% |
| Disc swelling at presentation | 83 (124) | 66.9% |
| Accompanying headache | 37 (127) | 29.1% |
| White matter lesions on MRI | 41 (126) | 32.5% |
| Preceding febrile illness within 1 month | 39 (108) | 36.1% |
| Vaccination history within 1 month | 7 (101) | 6.9% |
|
| ||
| Visual acuity at presentation | Total = 126 | |
| ≥20/20 | 4 | 3.2% |
| <20/20-≥ 20/40 | 11 | 8.7% |
| <20/40-≥ 20/200 | 28 | 22.2% |
| <20/200-> counting fingers | 26 | 20.6% |
|
| ||
| Counting finger-no light perception | 57 | 45.2% |
|
| ||
| Final visual outcome† | Total = 100 | |
| Good | 76 | 76% |
| Fair | 15 | 15% |
| Poor | 9 | 9% |
SD = standard deviation, IQR = interquartile range. †Visual outcome was categorized as the latest BCVA ≥20/40 with no visual field defect (good), BCVA <20/40∼≥ 20/200 or ≥ 20/40 with permanent visual field defect (fair), and BCVA less than 20/200 (poor).
Demographic, clinical, and serologic features of 101 children who were followed up for more than 6 months according to their demyelination syndrome diagnosis.
| Variables | Isolated ON ( | Recurrent ON ( | MS ( | NMOSD ( | ADEM-ON ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, median (IQR), y | 9.3 (6.7–13.3) | 10.1 (6.0–13.9) | 10.6 (7.8–14.1) | 11.8 (9.5–13.8) | 7.8 (5.4–11.5) | 0.495 |
| Female, | 22 (45.8%) | 8 (66.7%) | 15 (79.0%) | 10 (83.3%) | 6 (66.7%) | 0.247 |
| Disc swelling at presentation | 32/47 (68.1%) | 7/12 (58.3%) | 10/19 (52.6%) | 6/12 (50%) | 7/9 (77.8%) | 0.381 |
| Intrathecal OCBs | 0/19 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | 3/14 (17.7%) | 0/12 (0%) | 0/7 (0%) | 0.121 |
| Total no. of optic neuritis, median (IQR) | 0 (0–0) | 1 (1–1) | 0 (0–1) | 1 (0–1) | 0 (0–0) | <0.001 |
| Bilateral involvement | 19 (39.6%) | 6 (50.0%) | 8 (42.1%) | 7 (53.9%) | 2 (22.2%) | 0.788 |
| MRI enhancement | 37/47 (78.7%) | 8/12 (66.7%) | 16/19 (84.2%) | 11/13 (84.6%) | 8/9 (88.9%) | 0.834 |
|
| ||||||
| Serologic testing | ||||||
| AQP4 antibody | 0/15 | 0/7 | 0/11 | 6/12 (50%) | 0/1 | |
| MOG antibody | 1/2 | 0/1 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 (0%) | |
| ANA antibody | 8/31 (25.8%) | 3/8 (37.5%) | 1/14 (7.1%) | 3/13 (23.1%) | 1/7 (14.3%) | |
|
| ||||||
| Visual outcome ( | 0.720 | |||||
| Good | 40 (83.3%) | 8 (66.7%) | 14 (73.7%) | 7 (58.3%) | 7 (77.8%) | |
| Fair | 5 (10.4%) | 2 (16.7%) | 4 (21.0%) | 3 (25.0%) | 1 (11.1%) | |
| Poor | 3 (6.3%) | 2 (16.7%) | 1 (5.3%) | 2 (16.7%) | 1 (11.1%) | |
|
| ||||||
| logMAR visual acuity at latest visit ( | 0.16 ± 0.42 | 0.34 ± 0.60 | 0.12 ± 0.39 | 0.44 ± 0.62 | 0.20 ± 0.48 | 0.250 |
| Follow-up duration, median (IQR) | 30 (15–42) | 47 (24–73) | 32 (18–78) | 54 (21–68) | 47 (23–61) | 0.003 |
ADEM = acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; ANA = anti-nuclear antibody; AQP4 = aquaporin-4; IQR = interquartile range; OCB = oligoclonal bands; ON = optic neuritis; MOG = myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein; MS = multiple sclerosis; NMO = neuromyelitis optica; NMOSD = neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. The percentages and interquartile ranges (IQR) are presented in parentheses. Continuous variables were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables. †Visual outcome was only analyzed among 100 patients who were followed up for more than 6 months and whose BCVA data were available. ‡Visual outcome was categorized as the latest BCVA ≥20/40 with no visual field defect (good), BCVA <20/40∼≥ 20/200 or ≥ 20/40 with permanent visual field defect (fair), and BCVA less than 20/200 (poor).
Figure 2Paired dot plot showing initial and final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in 100 patients with pediatric optic neuritis who were followed up for ≥6 months. BCVA presented as logMAR. BCVA improved from baseline to final visit by a mean value of 1.02 ± 0.70 logMAR (IQR, 0.30–1.7). BCVA of 20/800 or less was presented as 1.7 logMAR.
Comparison of patient demographics and clinical characteristics of pediatric optic neuritis.
| Variable | Pineles et al. ( | Wan et al. ( | Averseng-peaureaux et al. ( | Ambika et al. ( | Chen et al. ( | Present study ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years (range) | 10.2 (3.9–13.5) | 12.6 (3.9–18.ct8) | 11† | 11.8 (2–18) | 12.3 (5–18) | 10.7 (3.6–18.6) |
| Gender (female), % | 41% | 72% | 66% | 54% | 69% | 62% |
| Pain with eye movement | — | 43% | 49% | 46% | 83% | 47% |
| Bilateral involvement | 36% | 41% | 37% | 50% | 63% | 42% |
| Optic disc swelling | 75% | 67% | 52% | 50% | 64% | 67% |
| Severe visual loss at presentation (<20/200) | 52% | 50% | 48% | NA | 45% | 66% |
|
| ||||||
| Final visual outcome | ||||||
| ≥20/40 | 85% | 90% | 72%‡ | 71% | 85% | 76% |
| <20/40-≥ 20/200 | 11% | 8% | NA | NA | 4% | 15% |
| <20/200 | 4% | 3% | NA | NA | 11% | 9% |
|
| ||||||
| Final diagnosis | ||||||
| Isolated ON | 48% | 48% | 58% | 89% | 69% | 48% |
| Recurrent ON | 18% (MOGAD) | — | 6% | — | 10% | 12% |
| MS | 11% | 39% | 21% | 6% | 3% | 19% |
| NMOSD | 7% | 7% | 5% | — | 15% | 13% |
| ADEM-ON | 16% | 7% | — | 5% | 3% | 8% |
ADEM = acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; NMOSD = neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; MOGAD = myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated disorder; MS = multiple sclerosis; ON = optic neuritis. †The age in this study was presented as median. ‡72% of the patients had complete visual recovery (complete visual recovery defined as the recovery of normal visual acuity (20/20), or prior visual acuity if it was abnormal before optic neuritis occurrence).