Ting Yang1, Cheng Li2, Hui Zhang2, Jingyu Wang2, Xiaofang Xie1,3, Yongxian Wen2,4. 1. Fujian Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding By Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China. 2. Institute of Statistics and Applications, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China. 3. College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture & Forestry University, Fuzhou, China. 4. College of Computer and Information Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Abstract
GRAS proteins are plant-specific transcription factors and play important roles in plant growth, development, and stress responses. In this study, a total of 48 GRAS genes in the eggplant (S. melongena) genome were identified. These genes were distributed on 11 chromosomes unevenly, with amino acid lengths ranging from 417 to 841 aa. A total of 48 GRAS proteins were divided into 13 subgroups based on the maximum likelihood (ML) model. The gene structure showed that 60.42% (29/48) of SmGRASs did not contain any introns. Nine pairs of SmGRAS appeared to have a collinear relationship, and all of them belonged to segmental duplication. Four types of cis-acting elements, namely, light response, growth and development, hormone response, and stress response, were identified by a cis-acting element predictive analysis. The expression pattern analysis based on the RNA-seq data of eggplant indicated that SmGRASs were expressed differently in various tissues and responded specifically to cold stress. In addition, five out of ten selected SmGRASs (SmGRAS2/28/32/41/44) were upregulated under cold stress. These results provided a theoretical basis for further functional study of GRAS genes in eggplant.
GRAS proteins are plant-specific transcription factors and play important roles in plant growth, development, and stress responses. In this study, a total of 48 GRAS genes in the eggplant (S. melongena) genome were identified. These genes were distributed on 11 chromosomes unevenly, with amino acid lengths ranging from 417 to 841 aa. A total of 48 GRAS proteins were divided into 13 subgroups based on the maximum likelihood (ML) model. The gene structure showed that 60.42% (29/48) of SmGRASs did not contain any introns. Nine pairs of SmGRAS appeared to have a collinear relationship, and all of them belonged to segmental duplication. Four types of cis-acting elements, namely, light response, growth and development, hormone response, and stress response, were identified by a cis-acting element predictive analysis. The expression pattern analysis based on the RNA-seq data of eggplant indicated that SmGRASs were expressed differently in various tissues and responded specifically to cold stress. In addition, five out of ten selected SmGRASs (SmGRAS2/28/32/41/44) were upregulated under cold stress. These results provided a theoretical basis for further functional study of GRAS genes in eggplant.
The name of the GRAS gene family is derived from its first three identified members, namely, gibberellic acid insensitive (GAI) (Peng et al., 1997), repressor of GA1 (RGA) (Silverstone et al., 1998), and scarecrow (SCR) (Di Laurenzio et al., 1996). Members of the GRAS protein family have great differences in sequence length and structure. Typical GRAS proteins are generally composed of 400–770 amino acids, including a variable N-terminal sequence and a relatively conserved C-terminal sequence (Bolle, 2004). The conserved C-terminal of typical GRAS has five different sequence motifs: leucine heptad repeat I (LHRI), VHIID, leucine heptad repeat II (LHRII), PFYRE, and SAW (Pysh et al., 1999). It was reported that GRAS proteins of rice, Arabidopsis, Populus, grape, and tomato were divided into 13 subfamilies: DELLA, HAM, LISCL, AtSCR, AtPAT1, DLT, AtSCL3, AtSCL4/7, AtLAS, AtSHR, Pt20, Os19, and Os4 based on phylogenetic analysis (Liu and Widmer, 2014).Many studies have confirmed that GRAS proteins are important proteins in plant growth and development. For example, AtLAS controls the formation of the axillary meristem (Greb et al., 2003). OsSCR regulates asymmetric cell division (Kamiya et al., 2003). AtSCL3 is a tissue-specific integration factor of the GA pathway, which can promote the division and elongation of Arabidopsis root cells (Heo et al., 2011). In addition, GRAS genes are also involved in plant responses to various stresses. AtSCL14 interacts with Class II TGA to activate the detoxification system of the plant to reduce harm (Fode et al., 2008). In Arabidopsis thaliana, overexpression of BnLAS in Brassica napus leads to smaller stomatal opening, more wax deposition in leaves, and a lower water loss rate, indicating that BnLAS has potential applications in improving drought tolerance of plants (Yang, et al., 2011). In tomatoes, the transcript accumulation of SlGRAS4 exhibited more than 250-fold change during cold stress compared to that in the control plants, which means that GRAS can respond positively to cold stress (Huang et al., 2015). In grapes, overexpression of VaPAT1 gene, a member of the PAT1 subfamily, significantly increased plant resistance to cold by regulating jasmonic acid biosynthesis (Yuan et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2021). Torres-Galea et al. (2006) detected AtSCL13 expression patterns in PAT1 branches of Arabidopsis thaliana and found that AtSCL13 expression was induced under low temperature stress.Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) is a popular vegetable. It is cultivated all over the world, with the largest acreage in Asia. Eggplant is a kind of temperature-bias plant (Saini and Kaushik, 2019), and it is much more sensitive to low temperatures than other solanaceous vegetables (Wan et al., 2014), which is one of the main factors affecting the production of eggplant.There are few studies on genes related to low-temperature tolerance in eggplants, which mainly focus on the analysis of genes related to low-temperature tolerance in A. thaliana and the mining of low-temperature tolerant genes in wild eggplant based on high-throughput sequencing technology. Wan et al. (2014) transferred AtCOR15 and AtCBF3 into the eggplant cultivar Sanyueqie and assessed their cold tolerance. The results showed that the expression of the exogenous AtCBF3 and AtCOR15A could promote the cold adaptation process to protect eggplant plants from chilling stress (Wan et al., 2014). Zhou et al. (2020) isolated an ICE1-like gene (SmICE1a) from eggplant and functionally characterized its role in cold tolerance by overexpressing it in A. thaliana. The findings of this study indicated that the SmICE1a gene can be used to enhance cold tolerance in eggplant. A study using high-throughput sequencing technology to study the miRNA and its target genes of Solanum aculeatissimum at low temperatures obtained and verified nine significantly differentially expressed miRNAs and 12 targeted mRNAs (Yang et al., 2017). Therefore, excavating key cold resistance genes of eggplant is of significance for the cold resistance varieties’ breeding. At present, the response mode of GRAS transcription factor family members of eggplant under low temperature stress is not clear.In this study, a comprehensive investigation of the GRAS gene family, including physicochemical properties, gene structure, conserved motifs, phylogeny, chromosome location, collinearity, cis-acting elements, and gene expression patterns under low temperature stress, was performed based on the current eggplant genome sequence data. The information derived from this study would provide a solid foundation for the further functional investigation of GRAS genes in eggplant.
Materials and methods
Screening and domain identification of eggplant GRAS proteins
The protein sequences of A. thaliana 33) and Oryza sativa L. (50) GRAS members (Liu and Widmer, 2014) were downloaded from TAIR (http://www.Arabidopsis.org/) and Phytozome (http://www.phytozome.net/search.php). These protein sequences were used as the queries to identify the GRAS orthologs in eggplant using the BLASTP tool of SpudDB and the Eggplant Genome Database (http://eggplant-hq.cn). Proteins with more than 30% similarity to the query sequence and an E-value less than E−10 were selected. The domains for GRAS proteins were further confirmed using the Conserved Domain Database (CDD) of NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/bwrpsb/bwrpsb.cgi) and visualized by TBtools (Chen et al., 2020). The genes containing the GRAS domain were selected as the final candidates for eggplant GRAS genes and were renamed based on their physical position in the eggplant genome. The information of these genes was extracted from the eggplant database (http://eggplant-hq.cn), including gene IDs, physical position, gene sequence, and protein sequence. The molecular weight (MW), theoretical isoelectric point (pI), and protein length (PL) for the predicted SmGRAS proteins were calculated using the ExPASy online tool (http://prosite.expasy.org/) (Gasteiger et al., 2003).
Gene structure and conserved motif analysis of eggplant GRAS proteins
The SmGRAS gene structures were identified using the Gene Structure Display Server (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn) (Guo et al., 2007). The conserved motifs were identified using MEME software (http://meme-suite.org) (Bailey et al., 2009). The parameters were set at 10 motifs with an optimum motif width of 50–300 residues. The conserved motifs were further annotated with the CDD tool (Marchler et al., 2017).
Phylogenetic analysis of GRAS proteins
The GRAS protein sequences of eggplant, Arabidopsis, and rice were aligned using the multiple sequence alignment tool ClustalX (Thompson et al., 1997). The phylogenetic tree of GRAS family proteins was generated using the MEGA-X maximum likelihood (ML) model (Kumar et al., 2018) with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The SmGRASs were categorized based on taxonomic rules for the subfamily of Arabidopsis and rice GRAS protein sequences (Liu and Widmer, 2014).
Chromosomal location and collinearity analysis of SmGRASs
According to the annotation information of the eggplant genome downloaded from the Eggplant Genome Database, the physical positions of SmGRASs on chromosomes were obtained, and the chromosome mapping was performed using TBtools software (Chen et al., 2020). Collinearity of SmGRASs was analyzed using MCScanX software (Wang et al., 2012), and Circos (Krzywinski et al., 2009) software was used for visualization. To identify gene duplication, the parameters for the proportion of alignment and the similarity of the two sequences were set to be greater than 70%. Two duplicated genes with a distance of less than 100 kb on the same chromosome were defined as tandem duplicates (Yang et al., 2020), while any other duplicated gene pairs that did not meet the parameters of tandem duplicated genes were all defined as segmental duplicated genes.
Cis-acting element analysis of SmGRASs
According to the annotation information of the eggplant genome sequence, the 2 kb upstream sequence of SmGRASs was submitted to the PlantCARE website (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html) (Lescot et al., 2002) for cis-acting element prediction, and TBtools software (Chen et al., 2020) was used for visualization.
Expression pattern analysis of SmGRASs
According to the transcriptome data of eggplant (PRJNA328564 and PRJNA572318) published by NCBI, the FPKM (fragments per kilobase per million) value (log2 conversion) was used to analyze the expression of GRAS family genes under different tissues and low-temperature stress. Heatmaps of SmGRAS expression patterns were generated using the TBtools’ Heatmap module (Chen et al., 2020).
Plant treatments and qRT-PCR analysis
The commercial species “Selected Purple Long Eggplant” was used for qRT-PCR. Eighteen plants were grown in a growth chamber at 28°C with a 16/8 h light/dark photoperiod until the fourth leaves were fully expanded. Then, nine plants of these seedlings were transferred to 4°C for 12 h. The seedlings grown under normal conditions were used as a control. The treated and control plantlets were collected 12 h after treatment and then stored at −80°C before RNA extraction.The total RNA of the plantlets was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA samples were then assessed by qRT-PCR using SYBR Premix ExTaq (Takara). Actin was used as an internal control gene. Three biological replicates (each containing three plants) and three technical replicates were measured for each treatment. The relative expression level of a gene was calculated according to the 2−ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). The primers used for qRT-PCR analysis are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
Results and analysis
Identification and physicochemical property analysis of the SmGRASs
A total of 48 SmGRASs containing GRAS domains were identified from the whole genome of eggplant and renamed from SmGRAS1 to SmGRAS48 based on their physical position on chromosomes (Table 1). The protein lengths of the 48 SmGRASs varied from 417 (SmGRAS6) to 841 (SmGRAS27) amino acids. The molecular weights ranged from 46,955.22 Da (SmGRAS6) to 95,884.91 Da (SmGRAS27). The theoretical isoelectric points (pI) of these SmGRASs varied from 4.95 (SmGRAS45) to 8.43 (SmGRAS34).
TABLE 1
GRAS genes identified in eggplant.
No.
Gene name
Gene id
Location (bp)
Chr
MW (Da)
pI
PL (aa)
1
SmGRAS1
Smechr0100956.1
9096627..9597
1
74440.13
5.83
657
2
SmGRAS2
Smechr0100957.1
9100908..9588
1
74295.13
6.03
656
3
SmGRAS3
Smechr0101655.1
16353704..16356949
1
82853.66
5.64
766
4
SmGRAS4
Smechr0102147.1
23751511..23085
1
59071.26
6.58
525
5
SmGRAS5
Smechr0102148.1
23755015..23177
1
68002.17
5.1
598
6
SmGRAS6
Smechr0102782.1
44313493..44868
1
46955.22
6.29
417
7
SmGRAS7
Smechr0103899.1
101543583..101983
1
52423.91
6.2
467
8
SmGRAS8
Smechr0202369.1
68167819..68195
2
67484.03
5.04
616
9
SmGRAS9
Smechr0202394.1
68366257..68555
2
60491.63
5.58
548
10
SmGRAS10
Smechr0202592.1
70117709..70951
2
58773.7
5.74
518
11
SmGRAS11
Smechr0202609.1
70298129..70059
2
47501.12
5.46
421
12
SmGRAS12
Smechr0203187.1
74994635..74828
2
76998.66
5.25
697
13
SmGRAS13
Smechr0302081.1
80300515..80024
3
71252.27
6.26
652
14
SmGRAS14
Smechr0302579.1
86165898..86167872
3
58899.44
6.61
528
15
SmGRAS15
Smechr0303662.1
95960868..95962490
3
60658.13
5.41
541
16
SmGRAS16
Smechr0401109.1
48573914..48575963
4
55008.66
5.36
495
17
SmGRAS17
Smechr0401258.1
55717340..55718779
4
53181.96
5.96
465
18
SmGRAS18
Smechr0401532.1
64833269..64836967
4
62884.01
5.11
561
19
SmGRAS19
Smechr0500353.1
3950772..3952937
5
80739.03
5.69
720
20
SmGRAS20
Smechr0500354.1
3953971..3958015
5
81748.31
5.32
726
21
SmGRAS21
Smechr0500468.1
5367175..5374708
5
60210.61
5.49
541
22
SmGRAS22
Smechr0501999.1
71422121..71424489
5
63678.71
6.42
567
23
SmGRAS23
Smechr0502680.1
80486152..80487825
5
57594.82
5.44
501
24
SmGRAS24
Smechr0502748.1
81063283..81065782
5
52495.18
6.09
469
25
SmGRAS25
Smechr0600059.1
897922..900511
6
65616.54
5.6
579
26
SmGRAS26
Smechr0601319.1
66235763..66237871
6
65621.08
6.38
599
27
SmGRAS27
Smechr0602914.1
87323086..87326478
6
95884.91
5.88
841
28
SmGRAS28
Smechr0603017.1
88208662..88210722
6
72410.31
6.1
636
29
SmGRAS29
Smechr0701498.1
84937623..84938921
7
48011.8
5.25
433
30
SmGRAS30
Smechr0701743.1
92623237..92627075
7
60658.9
6.36
546
31
SmGRAS31
Smechr0701943.1
97245321..97247331
7
49218.94
5.53
434
32
SmGRAS32
Smechr0702503.1
104537045..104540305
7
64262.94
6.27
578
33
SmGRAS33
Smechr0702636.1
105493514..105496196
7
59959.92
5.27
538
34
SmGRAS34
Smechr0702726.1
106308917..106310185
7
47913.35
8.43
423
35
SmGRAS35
Smechr0800451.1
6768043..6770159
8
51558.29
5.45
450
36
SmGRAS36
Smechr0802185.1
82575983..82579091
8
76017.79
5.74
701
37
SmGRAS37
Smechr0802313.1
84095305..84098713
8
75327.93
5.71
680
38
SmGRAS38
Smechr0900438.1
6411669..6415271
9
86289.75
5.75
764
39
SmGRAS39
Smechr0900855.1
18793688..18795304
9
55612.27
5.08
484
40
SmGRAS40
Smechr0901929.1
79662612..79664345
9
55711.21
6.23
500
41
SmGRAS41
Smechr1000504.1
6691939..6694766
10
62131.32
5.73
556
42
SmGRAS42
Smechr1001636.1
64747643..64751256
10
86484.02
5.73
760
43
SmGRAS43
Smechr1001829.1
68156739..68160660
10
89747.97
5.92
826
44
SmGRAS44
Smechr1100032.1
470509..473623
11
59993
5.72
540
45
SmGRAS45
Smechr1100163.1
1902184..1903926
11
63608.38
4.95
581
46
SmGRAS46
Smechr1100616.1
8037435..8039120
11
55463.21
5.19
489
47
SmGRAS47
Smechr1102566.1
98372183..98374214
11
60852.15
6.65
546
48
SmGRAS48
Smechr1102664.1
99602433..99606100
11
83061.76
5.69
738
GRAS genes identified in eggplant.
Gene structure and conserved motif analysis of SmGRASs
Gene structure analysis showed that up to 60.42% (29/48) of SmGRASs genes did not contain any introns (Figure 1B), and the members clustered in the same subfamily had similar gene structures (Figure 1). Motif analysis (Figure 1C) indicated that members grouped in the same subfamily possessed similar conserved motif composition and sorting order, suggesting that members clustered in the same subfamily might share similar functions. All members contained motifs 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8, indicating that these motifs played an important role in the GRAS gene family. Among them, motif 5 is found in the C terminus of all SmGRASs, indicating that the C terminus of the SmGRAS gene family is relatively conserved, which is consistent with previous studies (Pysh et al., 1999). Using the CDD tool, a total of nine motifs (motifs 1–9) were functionally annotated for the components of the conserved GRAS domain. Moreover, conserved motif sequence analysis found that motif 1 contained a VHIID fragment in the GRAS domain, and motif 5 contained a SAW fragment in the GRAS domain (Figure 2).
FIGURE 1
Phylogenetic tree, gene structure, and conserved motif of 48 GRAS transcription factors in eggplant. (A) Maximum likelihood (ML) tree generated by MEGA-X under the LG + G model with bootstrapping analysis (1,000 replicates). (B) Exon–intron structures of SmGRASs generated by the online software GSDS. (C) Conserved motifs of SmGRASs were further annotated with the CDD tool.
FIGURE 2
SmGRAS protein motifs confirmed using CDD of NCBI.
Phylogenetic tree, gene structure, and conserved motif of 48 GRAS transcription factors in eggplant. (A) Maximum likelihood (ML) tree generated by MEGA-X under the LG + G model with bootstrapping analysis (1,000 replicates). (B) Exon–intron structures of SmGRASs generated by the online software GSDS. (C) Conserved motifs of SmGRASs were further annotated with the CDD tool.SmGRAS protein motifs confirmed using CDD of NCBI.The phylogenetic trees of GRAS proteins of A. thaliana (33), rice (50), and eggplant (48) were constructed by using the MEGA-X tool (Figure 3). Upon consultation with previous systematic classification rules of Arabidopsis and rice GRAS subfamilies (Liu and Widmer, 2014), the GRAS proteins of Arabidopsis, rice, and eggplant were divided into 13 subfamilies. Each subfamily contained SmGRAS members, and the number of SmGRAS members in different subfamilies varied greatly. Among them, PAT1 had the largest number of SmGRAS members (10),followed by LISCL (9). In contrast, LAS, OS4, DLT, and OS19 had the smallest subfamily, which contained only one member. The majority subfamilies contained the common members across A. thaliana, rice, and eggplant. However, the SmGRAS5 was a new subfamily identified in this study, which only contained GRAS members in eggplant. Moreover, OS4 and OS19 of GRAS members were only identified in rice and eggplant, and no members of these families were found in Arabidopsis. These results indicated that the GRAS protein subfamily might undergo differentiation between monocotyledons and dicotyledons to some extent.
FIGURE 3
Combined phylogenetic analysis of GRAS proteins from Arabidopsis, rice, and eggplant. The rooted maximum likelihood tree was constructed from alignments of 131 GRAS protein sequences from Arabidopsis (33), rice (50), and eggplant (48) under the LG + G + F model with 1,000 bootstrap replications. Bootstrap values above 50% are shown. For each subfamily, bootstrap values are shown in different colors.
Combined phylogenetic analysis of GRAS proteins from Arabidopsis, rice, and eggplant. The rooted maximum likelihood tree was constructed from alignments of 131 GRAS protein sequences from Arabidopsis (33), rice (50), and eggplant (48) under the LG + G + F model with 1,000 bootstrap replications. Bootstrap values above 50% are shown. For each subfamily, bootstrap values are shown in different colors.The 48 SmGRASs were unevenly distributed on 11 chromosomes of eggplant (Figure 4). The majority of SmGRAS members were distributed on chromosomes 1, 2, 5, 7, and 11, and chromosome 1 contained the largest number of SmGRASs (seven genes) while chromosomes 3, 4, 8, 9, and 10 all contained three SmGRAS members. Gene duplication events, including segmental duplication and tandem duplication (Cannon et al., 2004), were analyzed in this study. A total of nine SmGRAS gene pairs (3/36, 13/26, 15/2, 27/39, 32/41, 33/44, 30/42, 38/42, and 44/47) were identified (Figure 5). All of them were confirmed to be segmental duplication events.
FIGURE 4
Collinearity analysis of SmGRASs. Scale bar on the chromosome shows the length of the chromosome (Mb). Genes with segmental duplication are shown in the same color.
FIGURE 5
Cis-acting element analysis of SmGRASs. Note: (A) Photoresponsive cis-acting element; (B) growth- and development-related cis-acting element; (C) hormone response-related cis-acting elements; (D) cis-acting elements associated with stress.
Collinearity analysis of SmGRASs. Scale bar on the chromosome shows the length of the chromosome (Mb). Genes with segmental duplication are shown in the same color.Cis-acting element analysis of SmGRASs. Note: (A) Photoresponsive cis-acting element; (B) growth- and development-related cis-acting element; (C) hormone response-related cis-acting elements; (D) cis-acting elements associated with stress.
Cis-acting elements of SmGRASs
The 2 kb upstream CDS sequences were extracted from the promoter regions of 48 SmGRASs. The cis-acting elements in the promoter region of SmGRASs were predicted by the PlantCARE online tool (Figure 5). Four types of cis-acting elements were found in the promoter regions of SmGRASs. Each SmGRAS gene contains 5–19 photoresponsive cis-acting elements, which is the most abundant type. This is followed by hormone-associated cis-acting elements consisting of a combination of abscisic acid, auxin, gibberellin, methyl jasmonate, and salicylic acid responsive elements, which all SmGRAS members contain. However, there were few cis-acting elements related to growth and development and stress response, and the SmGRAS members containing these two types of cis-acting elements were 18 (SmGRAS04/08/12/15/16/18/19/22/25/30/33/35/36/37/40/41/44/48) and 22 (SmGRAS01/05/06/09/11/15/19/20/22/25/26/27/28/31/36/37/39/40/41/43/45/48), respectively.
Expression profiles of SmGRASs
To further explore the expression patterns of the GRAS genes, the transcript data of 16 tissues were obtained from the public genome database, including roots, stems, leaves, flowers, and fruits. A heatmap was generated based on the transcript data of 48 SmGRAS genes (Figure 6). As shown in Figure 6, some SmGRASs exhibited distinct tissue-specific expression patterns, while others were expressed throughout in the whole plant. A total of 48 genes were grouped into 3 groups (Figure 6). Group Ⅰ contained 10 genes (SmGRAS32/41/26/18/44/45/13/30/33/36), which showed higher expression levels in the whole growth period, indicating that these genes might have a relatively important role in the whole growth stage of plants. In contrast, 24 genes in group II showed low or no expression in most tissues. A total of 14 genes (SmGRAS1/2/7/10/29/9/20/48/3/8/24/38/21/27) were included in group III, which were at moderate expression levels in most of the analyzed tissues.
FIGURE 6
Expression analysis of SmGRASs in different tissues and different stages. The three colored boxes on the left of the picture symbol indicate the subfamily that the corresponding gene on the right belongs to.
Expression analysis of SmGRASs in different tissues and different stages. The three colored boxes on the left of the picture symbol indicate the subfamily that the corresponding gene on the right belongs to.
Expression of SmGRASs in response to cold stress
To further investigate the expression patterns of SmGRASs in response to cold stress, the relative expression levels were measured based on the expression FPKM values (Figure 7). Under cold stress, the expression levels of different genes showed great variation, such as SmGRAS2, SmGRAS7, SmGRAS8, SmGRAS16, SmGRAS24, SmGRAS29, SmGRAS32, and SmGRAS44. Among them, SmGRAS2, SmGRAS28, SmGRAS32, SmGRAS41, and SmGRAS44 showed significant upregulation, while the rest showed significant downregulation.
FIGURE 7
Expression changes of SmGRASs under cold stress. S0 and T0 represent the sensitive and tolerant varieties before low-temperature treatment, respectively. S12 and T12 represent the sensitive and tolerant varieties after low-temperature treatment, respectively. This experiment was repeated three times. The genes on the right of the image correspond to the two color-coded boxes on the left.
Expression changes of SmGRASs under cold stress. S0 and T0 represent the sensitive and tolerant varieties before low-temperature treatment, respectively. S12 and T12 represent the sensitive and tolerant varieties after low-temperature treatment, respectively. This experiment was repeated three times. The genes on the right of the image correspond to the two color-coded boxes on the left.According to the transcriptome data (Figure 8), ten SmGRAS genes that exhibited significant change under cold stress were selected for further qRT-PCR analysis (Figure 8). The results showed that five genes (SmGRAS2, SmGRAS28, SmGRAS32, SmGRAS41, and SmGRAS44) were upregulated and five genes (SmGRAS7/8/16/24/29) were downregulated. A similar gene expression pattern was found between the qRT-PCR and transcriptome analysis (Figure 7).
FIGURE 8
Relative expression levels of eight SmGRASs analyzed using qPCR in response to cold after 12 h treatment compared with that of control (CK). The bars of expression with and without hypothermia treatment are shown in red and blue, respectively. Y-axis represents relative expression values, and X-axis represents different genes. Error bars are standard deviations of three biological replicates.
Relative expression levels of eight SmGRASs analyzed using qPCR in response to cold after 12 h treatment compared with that of control (CK). The bars of expression with and without hypothermia treatment are shown in red and blue, respectively. Y-axis represents relative expression values, and X-axis represents different genes. Error bars are standard deviations of three biological replicates.
Discussion
In this study, a total of 48 SmGRASs were identified from the eggplant genome, higher than that of A. thaliana (34) and lower than that of rice (60) and tomato(53) (Liu and Widmer, 2014; Huang et al., 2015). As we all know, the genome size of eggplant was 1.07 Gb (Wei et al., 2020), much higher than that of rice (420 Mb) (Goff et al., 2002), A. thaliana (125 Mb) (Kaul et al., 2000), and potato (844 Mb) (Diambra, 2011). Thus, it can be seen that GRAS gene families are widely distributed in plants, and the number of family members is independent of genome size (Xu et al., 2016), which may be due to the degree of genetic expansion between species. Collinearity analysis showed that nine SmGRAS gene pairs had collinearity relationships, and all of them were segmental duplication events, indicating that the amplification of eggplant GRAS protein was mainly dependent on segmental duplication. Meanwhile, these collinear genes were also grouped into the same group in evolutionary tree analysis, such as SmGRAS21, SmGRAS33, SmGRAS44,and SmGRAS47.Phylogenetic tree, gene structure, and conserved motif analysis of SmGRASs showed that gene family members in the same group often had similar gene structures and conserved domains, but it was not excluded that some members had specificity. For example, in the HAM subgroup, only SmGRAS36 contains an intron, which may be due to the evolution of genes within the group. In addition, the exon–intron analysis showed that 60.42% of SmGRAS genes were intron-less (Figure 1B), with proportions of 82,2%, 77,4%, 67.6%, 55%, and 54.7% in P. mume, tomato, Arabidopsis, rice, and Populus (Liu and Widmer, 2014; Huang et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2015), respectively. The high percentage of intron-less genes in the GRAS gene family in plants implies the close evolutionary relationship of GRAS proteins.The functional studies on GRAS gene families have shown that they play an important role in various abiotic stress responses (Fan et al., 2017) and are extensively involved in stress resistance, signal transduction, and mycorrhizal formation in plants (Sun et al., 2012). This study analyzed the relative expression levels of SmGRASs under low-temperature stress and found that the expression levels of 10 SmGRASs were significantly different after low-temperature stress compared with normal conditions. Among them, SmGRAS2, SmGRAS32, and SmGRAS44 responded positively to low-temperature stress (Figure 8). Notably, SmGRAS32 and SmGRAS41 were segmentary replicate pairs (Figure 4), and their promoter regions both contained cis-acting elements related to cold stress (Figure 5), which was consistent with our qPCR results (Figure 8). The result suggested that segmentary replicate pairs may play similar functions. As we know, SmGRAS32 and SmGRAS44 belong to the PAT1 subfamily, indicating that members of this family can actively respond to low-temperature stress, which is consistent with the report of Yuan et al. (2016), and the genes included in this subfamily have potential applications in improving cold stress tolerance of plants. This study provides important information for further research on the function of GRAS transcription factors in eggplant under cold stress.
Conclusion
In this study, a total of 48 SmGRASs were identified by genome-wide analysis, and then a comprehensive analysis of the identified SmGRASs was conducted. The structural diversity of SmGRASs may reflect their functional diversity. The collinearity analysis of SmGRASs found nine pairs of genes in collinear relationships, and they belonged to segmental duplication. The analysis of expression patterns of SmGRASs showed that these genes were expressed distinctly in different tissues of eggplant, and five genes (SmGRAS2/32/28/41/44) were positively responsive to cold stress. Our results provide vital information for the further exploration of the functional aspects of the gene family.
Authors: Stephen A Goff; Darrell Ricke; Tien-Hung Lan; Gernot Presting; Ronglin Wang; Molly Dunn; Jane Glazebrook; Allen Sessions; Paul Oeller; Hemant Varma; David Hadley; Don Hutchison; Chris Martin; Fumiaki Katagiri; B Markus Lange; Todd Moughamer; Yu Xia; Paul Budworth; Jingping Zhong; Trini Miguel; Uta Paszkowski; Shiping Zhang; Michelle Colbert; Wei-lin Sun; Lili Chen; Bret Cooper; Sylvia Park; Todd Charles Wood; Long Mao; Peter Quail; Rod Wing; Ralph Dean; Yeisoo Yu; Andrey Zharkikh; Richard Shen; Sudhir Sahasrabudhe; Alun Thomas; Rob Cannings; Alexander Gutin; Dmitry Pruss; Julia Reid; Sean Tavtigian; Jeff Mitchell; Glenn Eldredge; Terri Scholl; Rose Mary Miller; Satish Bhatnagar; Nils Adey; Todd Rubano; Nadeem Tusneem; Rosann Robinson; Jane Feldhaus; Teresita Macalma; Arnold Oliphant; Steven Briggs Journal: Science Date: 2002-04-05 Impact factor: 47.728