| Literature DB >> 36118759 |
Raquel M Pinho1, Lydia C Garas1, B Carol Huang2, Bart C Weimer2, Elizabeth A Maga2.
Abstract
Malnourishment is a risk factor for childhood mortality, jeopardizing the health of children by aggravating pneumonia/acute respiratory infections and diarrheal diseases. Malnourishment causes morphophysiological changes resulting in stunting and wasting that have long-lasting consequences such as cognitive deficit and metabolic dysfunction. Using a pig model of malnutrition, the interplay between the phenotypic data displayed by the malnourished animals, the gene expression pattern along the intestinal tract, microbiota composition of the intestinal contents, and hepatic metabolite concentrations from the same animals were correlated using a multi-omics approach. Samples from the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum of malnourished (protein and calorie-restricted diet) and full-fed (no dietary restrictions) piglets were subjected to RNA-seq. Gene co-expression analysis and phenotypic correlations were made with WGCNA, while the integration of transcriptome with microbiota composition and the hepatic metabolite profile was done using mixOmics. Malnourishment caused changes in tissue gene expression that influenced energetic balance, cell proliferation, nutrient absorption, and response to stress. Repression of antioxidant genes, including glutathione peroxidase, in coordination with induction of metal ion transporters corresponded to the hepatic metabolite changes. These data indicate oxidative stress in the intestine of malnourished animals. Furthermore, several of the phenotypes displayed by these animals could be explained by changes in gene expression.Entities:
Keywords: childhood mortality; intestinal gene expression; malnourishment; small intestine; system biology
Year: 2022 PMID: 36118759 PMCID: PMC9478944 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.894640
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Principal component analysis of gene expression along the length of the intestinal tract in full-fed and malnourished pigs. Principal component analysis of the rlog transformed reads from Salmon for the full-fed (FF, n = 4) and malnourished (Mal, n = 4) groups in the duodenum (pink), jejunum (green), and ileum (blue).
Figure 2Gene expression and pathway analysis in the duodenum of full-fed and malnourished pigs. (A) Heatmap with hierarchical supervised clustering of the normalized counts using Euclidean distance for the 100 DE genes with the greatest variance between the full-fed (FF, n = 4) and malnourished (Mal, n = 4) groups in the duodenum. Z-score represents upregulated (red) and downregulated (blue) genes, with a color gradient indicating expression level. (B) Plot of the normalized counts of the 20 genes with the lowest padj values in the duodenum of FF [n = 4 (pink)] and Mal [n = 4 (blue)] animals. The genes are ordered left to right from lowest to greatest padj values. (C) Pathways significantly enriched in the duodenum when comparing the FF and Mal groups using GO and STRING functional analysis of upregulated genes associated with gluconeogenesis. Edge colors represent connection source: text mining connection (yellow), co-expression (black), curated databases (light blue), and experimentally determined (pink). (D) Reactome pathway analysis using the DE in the duodenum entrez gene ID in humans. Edges connect associated pathways. The size and color of nodes represent the number of genes up or downregulated and padj values, respectively.
Figure 3Gene expression and pathway analysis in the jejunum of full-fed and malnourished pigs. (A) Heatmap with hierarchical supervised clustering of the normalized counts using Euclidean distance for the 100 DE genes with the greatest variance between the full-fed (FF, n = 4) and malnourished (Mal, n = 4) groups in the jejunum. Z-score represents upregulated (red) and downregulated (blue) genes, with a color gradient indicating expression level. (B) Plot of the normalized counts of the 20 genes with the lowest padj values in the jejunum of FF [n = 4 (pink)] and Mal [n = 4 (blue)] animals. The genes are ordered left to right from lowest to greatest padj values. (C) Reactome analysis of downregulated genes in the jejunum of FF compared to Mal piglets in the jejunum. Bar length represents the counts of genes DE in each pathway, and colors represent the padj value.
Figure 4Gene expression and pathway analysis in the ileum of full-fed and malnourished pigs. (A) Heatmap with hierarchical supervised clustering of the normalized counts using Euclidean distance for the 100 DE genes with the greatest variance between the full-fed (FF, n = 4) and malnourished (Mal, n = 4) groups in the ileum. Z-score represents upregulated (red) and downregulated (blue) genes, with a color gradient indicating expression level. (B) Plot of the normalized counts of the 20 genes with the lowest padj values in the jejunum of FF [n = 4 (pink)] and Mal [n = 4 (blue)] animals. The genes are ordered left to right from lowest to greatest padj values. (C) Gene ontology analysis comparing the DE genes in the ileum of FF and Mal animals. The pathways displayed had p-values < 0.005, with the height of the inner circle of the graph representing significance and the color representing the pathway status (increased or decreased expression compared to FF samples). The outer circle represents the genes in the pathway that are up or downregulated in the malnourished group.
DE genes in common to all small intestinal sections between the FF and Mal groups.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENSSSCG00000035347 | 3.06 | 1.88 | 1.11 | ENSSSCG00000035347 |
| ENSSSCG00000031367 | 2.44.58 | 2.54 | 1.1 | ENSSSCG00000031367 |
| ENSSSCG00000009213 | 1.3 | −2.94 | 1.42 | ENSSSCG00000009213 |
| ENSSSCG00000007978 | −2.59 | 2.27 | −3.12 | ENSSSCG00000007978 |
| ENSSSCG00000011629 | 1.58 | 1.59 | 1.02 | ACAD11 |
| ENSSSCG00000015356 | 2.1 | 2.06 | 2.07 | AGMO |
| ENSSSCG00000038300 | 1.34 | 1.24 | 1.39 | ALDOB |
| ENSSSCG00000017861 | 1.13 | 1.76 | 1.86 | ASPA |
| ENSSSCG00000008959 | −1.53 | −1.76 | −1.77 | CXCL2* |
| ENSSSCG00000023320 | 1.83 | 1.81 | 1.34 | CYP3A39 |
| ENSSSCG00000021971 | 1.95 | 1.86 | 1.21 | DPEP1* |
| ENSSSCG00000004017 | 1.70 | 1.38 | 1.65 | FRMD1 |
| ENSSSCG00000027865 | 1.07 | 1.46 | 1 | GALC |
| ENSSSCG00000029592 | 3.29 | 3.88 | 1.78 | GPRC5A |
| ENSSSCG00000014725 | −2.48 | −2.96 | −2.9 | HBB |
| ENSSSCG00000038221 | 1.54 | 1.36 | 1.62 | HSD17B2 |
| ENSSSCG00000004454 | −1.24 | −1.42 | −3.96 | ME1* |
| ENSSSCG00000007436 | 1.91 | 1.21 | 2.37 | MMP9 |
| ENSSSCG00000017755 | −1.99 | −1.58 | −1.83 | NOS2 |
| ENSSSCG00000007507 | 2.98 | 2.07 | 1.76 | PCK1* |
| ENSSSCG00000002009 | 1.69 | 1.04 | 1.3 | PCK2 |
| ENSSSCG00000025969 | 1.71 | 1.7 | 1.54 | PTPRR |
| ENSSSCG00000010554 | −2.29 | −2.93 | −2.16 | SCD* |
| ENSSSCG00000002032 | 1.94 | 2.47 | 1.2 | SLC7A8 |
| ENSSSCG00000030388 | −1.41 | −1.3 | −1.14 | UPP1 |
DESeq2 results from Salmon transcript abundance of the DE genes in all sections of the small intestine in alphabetical order. Log2FC– log2 fold change in abundance of the Mal group compared to FF. Duod, Duodenum; Jej, Jejunum. *Genes used for qRTPCR for validation of RNAseq results.
Figure 5Validation of RNAseq data. (A) qPCR results of relative expression normalized to TATA box binding protein using jejunum (DPEP1, SCD, and PCK1) and duodenal samples (CXCL2 and ME1). *Significantly different (p < 0.05) by the Wilcoxon test. (B) Normalized counts from Salmon of animals from the full-fed (FF, n =4) and malnourished (Mal, n = 4) groups in the duodenum and jejunum. *Significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Heatmap of consensus modules-malnourished traits relationships. Consensus modules (clusters of co-expressed genes) made with samples from both the FF and Mal groups are identified as colors on the Y-axis and traits from Mal animals are on the X-axis. P-values of < 0.05 are displayed in the heatmap, color indicative of positive (red) or negative (blue) correlation between gene module and phenotype. The block of modules associated with the histological data is highlighted with a black box.
Gene ontology analysis of the genes in the tan consensus module.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GO:0030433 | ER–associated ubiquitin–dependent protein catabolic process | 7 | 2.38e−05 | HSP90B1, UBXN4, EDEM3, ERLEC1, STT3B, EDEM2, PSMC6 |
| GO:0032287 | peripheral nervous system myelin maintenance | 3 | 2.46e−03 | SOD1, SH3TC2, NDRG1 |
| GO:0006465 | signal peptide processing | 3 | 1.51e−02 | SEC11C, IMMP1L, SPCS3 |
| GO:0055114 | oxidation–reduction process | 7 | 2.27e−02 | HPD, CYP51A1, PGD, SOD1, GGA2, MSMO1, DLD |
| GO:0090277 | positive regulation of peptide hormone secretion | 2 | 3.17e−02 | TFR2, ILDR1 |
| GO:0043686 | co–translational protein modification | 2 | 3.17e−02 | STT3B, STT3A |
| GO:0006424 | glutamyl–tRNA aminoacylation | 2 | 3.17e−02 | EARS2, EPRS |
| GO:0006572 | tyrosine catabolic process | 2 | 3.17e−02 | HPD, TAT |
| GO:0043066 | negative regulation of apoptotic process | 8 | 3.83e−02 | FAIM, DAB2, HSP90B1, HSPD1, MYC, PIM1, STAT5B, PTK2B |
| GO:0045454 | cell redox homeostasis | 4 | 4.12e−02 | PDIA3, PDRX4, PDIA4, DLD |
| GO:0007229 | integrin–mediated signaling pathway | 4 | 4.57e−02 | FGR, LAT, PTK2B, ITGB6 |
| GO:0043687 | post–translational protein modification | 2 | 4.72e−02 | STT3B, STT3A |
| GO:0000303 | response to superoxide | 2 | 4.72e−02 | UCP3, SOD1 |
| GO:0097466 | glycoprotein ERAD pathway | 2 | 4.72e−02 | EDEM3, EDEM2 |
| GO:1904382 | mannose trimming involved in glycoprotein ERAD pathway | 2 | 4.72e−02 | EDEM3, EDEM2 |
| GO:0072593 | reactive oxygen species metabolic process | 3 | 4.77e−02 | PRDX4, SOD1, NDUFS1 |
Resulting from the comparison between consensus modules and phenotypic data from the malnourished group.
Pathway analysis of the genes in the light–cyan consensus module.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GO:0015701 | bicarbonate transport | 3 | 0.0097 | SLC26A7, SLC4A7, SLC4A4 |
| GO:0007204 | positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentration | 4 | 0.015 | GLP1R, GPR33, CCR10, KNG1 |
| GO:0006508 | proteolysis | 5 | 0.018 | PROC, PGA5, TMPRSS15, CAPN6, Gastricsin–like |
| GO:0051453 | regulation of intracellular pH | 3 | 0.02 | SLC26A7, SLC4A7, SLC4A4 |
| GO:0006730 | one–carbon metabolic process | 3 | 0.022 | AHCYL2, CA9, CA2 |
| GO:0030501 | positive regulation of bone mineralization | 3 | 0.024 | BMP7, BMP6, KL |
| GO:0046903 | secretion | 2 | 0.039 | CA9, CA2 |
| GO:0071281 | cellular response to iron ion | 2 | 0.039 | TF, BMP6 |
| GO:0015670 | carbon dioxide transport | 2 | 0.039 | AQP5, CA2 |
| GO:0030195 | negative regulation of blood coagulation | 2 | 0.039 | PROC, KNG1 |
| GO:0045665 | negative regulation of neuron differentiation | 3 | 0.041 | BMP7, MIB1, ISL1 |
| R–HSA−186712 | Regulation of beta–cell development | 7 | 0.00025 (padj) | NEUROG3, FOXA2, NKX2–2, PAX4, RFX6, NEUROD1, INSM1 |
| R–HSA−140837 | Intrinsic Pathway of Fibrin Clot Formation | 5 | 0.001 (padj) | SERPINA5, F11, SERPINE2, KNG1, PROC |
| R–HSA−140877 | Formation of Fibrin Clot (Clotting Cascade) | 5 | 0.01 (padj) | SERPINA5, F11, SERPINE2, KNG1, PROC |
| R–HSA−210745 | Regulation of gene expression in beta cells | 4 | 0.01 (padj) | FOXA2, NKX2–2, NEUROD1, RFX6 |
| R–HSA−425381 | Bicarbonate transporters | 3 | 0.01 (padj) | SLC4A7, AHCYL2, SLC4A4 |
| R–HSA−8957275 | Post–translational protein phosphorylation | 7 | 0.02 (padj) | PENK, AFP, KNG1, TF, PROC, MIA3, ITIH2 |
| R–HSA−381426 | Regulation of Insulin–like Growth Factor (IGF) transport and uptake by Insulin–like Growth Factor Binding Proteins (IGFBPs) | 7 | 0.04 (padj) | PENK, AFP, KNG1, TF, PROC, MIA3, ITIH2 |
| R–HSA−425407 | SLC–mediated transmembrane transport | 10 | 0.04 (padj) | SLC28A3, SLC26A7, SLC11A1, SLC16A7, SLC6A11, SLC4A7, SLC27A6, AHCYL2, SLC4A4, SLC38A3 |
Resulting from the comparison between consensus modules and phenotypic data from the malnourished group.
Figure 7Heatmaps showing correlations between DE genes (mRNA, orange), microbiota (data_16S, yellow), and liver metabolites (metabolites, dark orange) in full-fed (FF, pink) and malnourished animals (Mal, blue) in the (A) duodenum, (B) jejunum and (C) ileum. The color key represents the level of the variable in the sample from negative (dark red) to positive (dark blue).