| Literature DB >> 36118313 |
Prashanth Gopala Krishna1, Prabhu Chandra Mishra2, Mutthuraju Mahadev Naika3, Manoj Gadewar4, Prashanth Paduvarahalli Ananthaswamy5, Srilatha Rao6, Sivadhas Rosejanet Boselin Prabhu7, Kalanakoppal Venkatesh Yatish8, Holenarasipura Gundurao Nagendra9, Mahmoud Moustafa10,11, Mohammed Al-Shehri10, Saurabh Kumar Jha2,12,13, Bharat Lal14, Sreeja Mole Stephen Santhakumari15.
Abstract
Nanotechnology is a fast-expanding area with a wide range of applications in science, engineering, health, pharmacy, and other fields. Among many techniques that are employed toward the production of nanoparticles, synthesis using green technologies is the simplest and environment friendly. Nanoparticles produced from plant extracts have become a very popular subject of study in recent decades due to their diverse advantages such as low-cost synthesis, product stability, and ecofriendly protocols. These merits have prompted the development of nanoparticles from a variety of sources, including bacteria, fungi, algae, proteins, enzymes, etc., allowing for large-scale production with minimal contamination. However, nanoparticles obtained from plant extracts and phytochemicals exhibit greater reduction and stabilization and hence have proven the diversity of properties, like catalyst/photocatalyst, magnetic, antibacterial, cytotoxicity, circulating tumor deoxy ribo nucleic acid (CT-DNA) binding, gas sensing, etc. In the current scenario, nanoparticles can also play a critical role in cleaning wastewater and making it viable for a variety of operations. Nano-sized photocatalysts have a great scope toward the removal of large pollutants like organic dyes, heavy metals, and pesticides in an eco-friendly and sustainable manner from industrial effluents. Thus, in this review article, we discuss the synthesis of several metal nanoparticles using diverse plant extracts, as well as their characterization via techniques like UV-vis (ultraviolet-visible), XRD (X-ray diffraction), SEM (scanning electron microscopy), TEM (transmission electron microscopy), FTIR (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy), etc., and catalytic activity on various hazardous systems.Entities:
Keywords: characterization; green synthesis; hazard remediation; nanoparticles; photocatalyst; plant extract
Year: 2022 PMID: 36118313 PMCID: PMC9479337 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.917831
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.545
FIGURE 1Synthesis process of NPs.
Phytochemical tests of plant extracts.
| Sl. no. | Type of phytochemical | Phytochemical test | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthraquinone | Borntrager’s test | +/− |
| 2 | Flavonoids | Alkaline reagent test, Lead acetate test | +/− |
| 3 | Anthocyanins | HCl test | +/− |
| 4 | Tannins | Lead acetate test | +/− |
| 5 | Phytosterols | Libermann-Burchard’s test, Salkowski’s test | +/− |
| 6 | Phlobatannins | HCl test | +/− |
| 7 | Alkaloids | Mayer’s reagent test, Wagner’s reagent test, Hager's reagent test | +/− |
| 8 | Phenol | Killer-Killiani test, Ferric chloride test | +/− |
| 9 | Glycosides | Legal's test, Borntrager's test | +/− |
| 10 | Terpenoids | Salkowski's test | +/− |
| 11 | Saponins | Froth test | +/− |
| 12 | Steroids | Burchard's test | +/− |
| 13 | Carbohydrates | Molisch's test, Barfoed’s test | +/− |
| 14 | Reducing sugars | Fehling's test, Benedict’s test | +/−- |
| 15 | Tannins and phenolic compounds | Lead acetate test, Killer-Killiani test, Ferric chloride test | +/− |
| 16 | Proteins and amino acids | Ninhydin test, Biuret test | +/− |
FIGURE 2Possible mechanism of synthesis of NPs from leaves extract of plants.
FIGURE 3UV–vis absorption spectra of (A) JC-Cu NPs (Ghosh et al., 2020b), (B) ZnO NPs (Singh et al., 2019a), (C) Se NPs at different time intervals (0, 12, and 24 h) (Alagesan and Venugopal, 2019), and (D) optimizing parameters to produce Ag2O NPs with different pH values by UV–vis spectroscopy (Manikandan et al., 2017).
FIGURE 4Probable antimicrobial mechanism of different metal NPs (Shaikh et al., 2019).
FIGURE 5Proposed anticancer mechanism of metal oxide NPs (Letchumanan et al., 2021).
FIGURE 6FT-IR spectra of (A) JC-Cu NPs (Ghosh et al., 2020b), (B) CO-Ag NPs (Zia et al., 2016), (C) AC-Ag NPs (Chandraker et al., 2019), and (D) AH-Cu NPs (Chandraker et al., 2020).
FIGURE 7XRD analysis of (A) JC-Cu NPs (Ghosh et al., 2020b), (B) CO-Ag NPs (Zia et al., 2016), (C) AC-Ag NPs (Chandraker et al., 2019), and (D) AH-Cu NPs (Chandraker et al., 2020).
FIGURE 8SEM analysis of (A) JC-Cu NPs (Ghosh et al., 2020b), (B) CO-Ag NPs (Zia et al., 2016), (C) AC-Ag NPs (Chandraker et al., 2019), and (D) AH-Cu NPs (Chandraker et al., 2020).
FIGURE 9Band gap energy of Se NPs at 24 h (Alagesan and Venugopal, 2019).
FIGURE 10Possible mechanism of dye degradation by NPs.
Photocatalytic activity by green synthesized NPs.
| Entry | Nanoparticles | Plant | Dye/Pesticide/Oil | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ag |
| MB and RhB |
|
| 2 | Ag |
| MB |
|
| 3 | Ag |
| Safranine O, MR, MO, and MB |
|
| 4 | Ag |
| MB |
|
| 5 | Ag |
| MO, MR, CR |
|
| 6 | Ag |
| MB |
|
| 7 | Ag |
| RhB |
|
| 8 | Ag |
| MO |
|
| 9 | Ag |
| MO |
|
| 10 | Ag |
| MB |
|
| 11 | Ag |
| MO |
|
| 12 | Ag |
| MB |
|
| 13 | Ag |
| MO |
|
| 14 | Ag |
| MO |
|
| 15 | Ag/AgCl |
| MO |
|
| 16 | Ag/AgCl |
| MB |
|
| 17 | Ag/ZnO |
| MB |
|
| 18 | Ag doped ZnO |
| MB |
|
| 19 | Graphene oxide-Ag |
| Chlorpyrifos |
|
| 20 | Cu |
| MB |
|
| 21 | Cu |
| CR |
|
| 22 | Cu |
| MB |
|
| 23 | CuO |
| CV |
|
| 24 | CuO |
| AB 210 |
|
| 25 | CuO |
| NB, RY 160 |
|
| 26 | CuO |
| MB, CV |
|
| 27 | CuO |
| MB |
|
| 28 | CuO |
| RhB |
|
| 29 | CuO |
| MO |
|
| 30 | CuO |
| POME |
|
| 31 | CuO, Ag, MnO2 |
| CR |
|
| 32 | CuO NPs on Carbon |
| Atrazine |
|
| 33 | ZnO |
| MB, EY, MG |
|
| 34 | ZnO |
| MR |
|
| 35 | ZnO |
| RhB |
|
| 36 | ZnO |
| RhB |
|
| 37 | ZnO |
| BG |
|
| 38 | ZnO |
| RhB |
|
| 39 | ZnO |
| Zoxamide |
|
| 40 | Cu doped ZnO |
| MB |
|
| 41 | ZnO, Mn doped ZnO |
| MB |
|
| 42 | RGO-ZnO |
| RhB |
|
| 43 | SnO2-ZnO |
| MO |
|
| 44 | SnO2-ZnO |
| RhB |
|
| 45 | ZnO-Co3O4 |
| MO |
|
| 46 | SnWO4/ZnO |
| MB |
|
| 47 | NiO |
| CR |
|
| 48 | Ni/NiO |
| CV |
|
| 49 | NiO |
| MO |
|
| 50 | NiO |
| 4-CHP |
|
| 51 | NiO |
| 4-CHP |
|
| 52 | NiO, CuO, ZnO |
| AR88 |
|
| 53 | Cu doped NiO |
| MB |
|
| 54 | CuO and NiO |
| L-CHT |
|
| 55 | CdS |
| MB |
|
| 56 | Cu-Co-Ni |
| MB |
|
| 57 | CoO2 |
| Direct yellow-142 and MO |
|
| 58 | α-Fe2O3 |
| Remazol yellow RR dye |
|
| 59 | IO |
| MO |
|
| 60 | FO |
| MB |
|
| 61 | FeO |
| CV |
|
| 62 | Fe-P |
| AB 194 |
|
| 63 | Fe3O4 |
| MB, CR |
|
| 64 | Iron oxide |
| RhB |
|
| 65 | Pd |
| CR |
|
| 66 | TiO2 |
| RhB |
|
| 67 | Cu@TiO2 |
| MB |
|
| 68 | TiO2 |
| RhB |
|
| 69 | TiO2 |
| MB, MO |
|
| 70 | Au/TiO2 |
| MB |
|
| 71 | MgO |
| MB |
|
| 72 | CeO2 |
| AO7 |
|
| 73 | CeO2 |
| Amido black |
|
| 74 | Co-CeO2 |
| AO7 |
|
| 75 | ZnS |
| MB |
|
| 76 | Au |
| MB |
|
| 77 | WO3 |
| MB |
|
| 78 | CuI |
| RR |
|
| 79 | ZrO2 |
| RY160 |
|
| 80 | Pt |
| MB |
|
| 81 | CoFe2O4 |
| AO7 |
|
| 82 | Ni-CuO, Cu-Cr2O4, Ni-Cr oxide |
| Phenol, 2,4-dinitrophenol, 3-amino phenol |
|