| Literature DB >> 32201783 |
Mithun Kumar Ghosh1, Kavita Jain2, Siddique Khan2, Kalpataru Das2, Tanmay Kumar Ghorai1.
Abstract
A novel bimetallic and reusable Y2ZnO4 nanocatalyst was synthesized by a simple coprecipitation method. The prepared nanocatalyst exhibited dual catalytic activity and was characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The average crystallite and grain sizes were found to be 17 ± 1 and 10 ± 2 nm, respectively. On the one hand, the catalytic activity of the nanocatalyst was studied for the Knoevenagel condensation reaction of aromatic aldehydes with active methylene compounds, such as ethyl cyanoacetate and malononitrile, under microwave irradiation and solvent-free conditions. On the other hand, the nanoparticles also showed faster photocatalytic activity against methyl orange (MO) compared to other dyes. The nanocatalyst was easily recoverable by a simple filtration method and was recycled without any significant loss of catalytic activity. The advantages of this nanocatalyst were a simple workup procedure, high reaction yields, solvent-free conditions, reusability, and a short reaction time under green reaction conditions.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32201783 PMCID: PMC7081418 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03875
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1XRD pattern of Y2ZnO4.
Figure 2SEM image of Y2ZnO4 at different resolutions.
Optimization of the Knoevenagel Condensation Using Nanocatalyst Y2ZnO4a
| entry | solvent | nanocatalyst (mol %) | time (h) | condition | yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | no solvent | Y2ZnO4 (10%) | 5 | RT | 41 |
| 2 | no solvent | Y2ZnO4 (10%) | 5 | 70 °C | 56 |
| 3 | no solvent | Y2ZnO4 (05%) | 5 | 70 °C | 48 |
| 4 | H2O | Y2ZnO4 (10%) | 5 | RT | nd |
| 5 | H2O | Y2ZnO4 (10%) | 5 | 70 °C | nd |
| 6 | CH3OH | Y2ZnO4 (10%) | 5 | RT | nd |
| 7 | CH3OH | Y2ZnO4 (10%) | 5 | 70 °C | 42 |
| 8 | CH3CN | Y2ZnO4 (10%) | 5 | RT | nd |
| 9 | CH3CN | Y2ZnO4 (10%) | 5 | 70 °C | nd |
| 10 | C2H5OH | Y2ZnO4 (10%) | 5 | RT | nd |
| 11 | C2H5OH | Y2ZnO4 (10%) | 5 | 70 °C | 62 |
Reaction conditions: Unless otherwise mentioned, the reaction was carried out with benzaldehyde 1a (0.530 mmol, 56.2 mg), ethyl cyanoacetate 2 (0.442 mmol, 50 mg), and nanocatalyst Y2ZnO4 (10 mol %, 0.044 mmol, 13.6 mg) at room temperature (RT).
Yield of 3a was determined by 1H NMR analysis.
Not determined (nd).
Optimization of the Knoevenagel Condensation under Microwave (MW) Conditionsa
| entry | nanocatalyst (mol %) | time (min) | condition | yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Y2ZnO4 (10%) | 15 | MW 140 W | 70 |
| 2 | Y2ZnO4 (10%) | 15 | MW 280 W | 79 |
| 3 | Y2ZnO4 (10%) | 15 | MW 420 W | 92 |
| 4 | Y2ZnO4 (10%) | 10 | MW 420 W | 78 |
| 5 | Y2ZnO4 (20%) | 10 | MW 420 W | 86 |
Reaction conditions: Unless otherwise mentioned, the reaction was carried out with benzaldehyde 1a (0.530 mmol, 56.2 mg), ethyl cyanoacetate 2 (0.442 mmol, 50 mg), and nanocatalyst Y2ZnO4 (10 mol %, 0.044 mmol, 13.6 mg) under microwave (MW) and solvent-free conditions.
Yield of 3a was determined by 1H NMR analysis.
Figure 3Effect of microwave irradiation power on the yield of product 3a.
Knoevenagel Condensation under the Optimized Conditiona
Reaction conditions: Unless otherwise mentioned, the reaction was carried out with aromatic aldehyde 1 (0.530 mmol, 56.2 mg), ethyl cyanoacetate 2 (0.442 mmol, 50 mg), and nanocatalyst Y2ZnO4 (10 mol %, 0.044 mmol, 13.6 mg) under MW (420 W) and solvent-free conditions.
Literature yield.
Yield of 3 was determined by 1H NMR analysis.
Figure 4Recycling of nanocatalyst Y2ZnO4 in the Knoevenagel condensation.
Figure 5SEM image of nanocatalyst Y2ZnO4 after the reaction.
Scheme 1Proposed Mechanism for the Knoevenagel Condensation Catalyzed by Y2ZnO4
Figure 6Photodegradation of different dyes by the nanocatalyst as a normalized change in the concentration as a function of irradiation time (a) and absorption spectra of the MO solution in the presence of the nanocatalyst under sunlight (b).
Figure 7Proposed mechanism for MO degradation in the presence of the nanocatalyst and sunlight.