Wongthawat Liawrungrueang1, K Daniel Riew2, Nantawit Sugandhavesa3, Torphong Bunmaprasert4. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand. 2. Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill-Cornell Medicine and Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Och Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. 4. Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. torpong197@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the Atlas (C1) lateral mass screw placement between screw trajectories of 0° and 15° medial angulation while using the intersection between lateral mass and inferomedial edge of the posterior arch. METHODS: Forty-eight Atlas lateral masses were prepared and divided into 2 groups: Group 1; screws inserted at 3 mm lateral to the reference point with screw trajectory of 0° angulation(N = 24) and Group 2; those inserted with screw trajectory of 15° medial angulation(N = 24). We evaluated the atlas anatomy, screw purchase and the presence of any breaches using CT scan. RESULTS: The radiographic parameters for Groups 1 and 2 were found statistically different (p-value < 0.05): bilateral intraosseous screw lengths (17.92 ± 1.47 mm. vs. 20.71 ± 2.4 mm.), bilateral screw length (29.92 ± 1.72 mm. vs. 33.13 ± 1.78 mm.), left screw medial angulation (x°) (0.67° ± 0.78° vs.14.17° ± 3.51°), right screw medial angulation (y°) (0.83° ± 1.03° vs.14.25° ± 2.53°) and bilateral screw medial angulation (0.75° ± 0.9° vs. 14.21° ± 2.99°). Twenty-two screws (91.67%) using the 0° medial angulation and nineteen screws (79.17%) using the 15° medial angulation had no cortical violations (Grade 0). However, two screws (8.33%) with 0° medial angulation and five screws (20.83%) with 15° medial angulation had breach less than 2 mm (Grade 1). There were no screws with breach between 2 and 4 mm (Grade 2) or greater than 4 mm. (Grade 3). CONCLUSION: A starting point of 3-mm lateral to the intersection between lateral mass and inferomedial edge of the Atlas posterior arch can be safely and effectively used to insert C1 lateral mass using both 0° and 15° medial angulation.
PURPOSE: To compare the Atlas (C1) lateral mass screw placement between screw trajectories of 0° and 15° medial angulation while using the intersection between lateral mass and inferomedial edge of the posterior arch. METHODS: Forty-eight Atlas lateral masses were prepared and divided into 2 groups: Group 1; screws inserted at 3 mm lateral to the reference point with screw trajectory of 0° angulation(N = 24) and Group 2; those inserted with screw trajectory of 15° medial angulation(N = 24). We evaluated the atlas anatomy, screw purchase and the presence of any breaches using CT scan. RESULTS: The radiographic parameters for Groups 1 and 2 were found statistically different (p-value < 0.05): bilateral intraosseous screw lengths (17.92 ± 1.47 mm. vs. 20.71 ± 2.4 mm.), bilateral screw length (29.92 ± 1.72 mm. vs. 33.13 ± 1.78 mm.), left screw medial angulation (x°) (0.67° ± 0.78° vs.14.17° ± 3.51°), right screw medial angulation (y°) (0.83° ± 1.03° vs.14.25° ± 2.53°) and bilateral screw medial angulation (0.75° ± 0.9° vs. 14.21° ± 2.99°). Twenty-two screws (91.67%) using the 0° medial angulation and nineteen screws (79.17%) using the 15° medial angulation had no cortical violations (Grade 0). However, two screws (8.33%) with 0° medial angulation and five screws (20.83%) with 15° medial angulation had breach less than 2 mm (Grade 1). There were no screws with breach between 2 and 4 mm (Grade 2) or greater than 4 mm. (Grade 3). CONCLUSION: A starting point of 3-mm lateral to the intersection between lateral mass and inferomedial edge of the Atlas posterior arch can be safely and effectively used to insert C1 lateral mass using both 0° and 15° medial angulation.
Authors: Torphong Bunmaprasert; Vorapop Trirattanapikul; Nantawit Sugandhavesa; Areerak Phanphaisarn; Wongthawat Liawrungrueang; Phichayut Phinyo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 3.390