| Literature DB >> 36117201 |
Sibylle Loibl1,2, Chiun-Sheng Huang3, Max S Mano4, Eleftherios P Mamounas5, Charles E Geyer6, Michael Untch7, Jean-Christophe Thery8, Ingo Schwaner9, Steven Limentani10, Niklas Loman11, Kristina Lübbe12, Jenny C Chang13, Thomas Hatschek14, David Tesarowski15, Chunyan Song15, Sanne Lysbet de Haas16, Thomas Boulet16, Chiara Lambertini16, Norman Wolmark17.
Abstract
Following chemotherapy and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-targeted neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive early breast cancer, residual invasive breast cancer at surgery may be HER2-negative on retesting in some patients. We evaluated outcomes with T-DM1 and trastuzumab in patients randomized in the phase III KATHERINE trial based on HER2-positive central testing of the pre-treatment core biopsy with HER2-negative central testing on their corresponding surgical specimen after neoadjuvant treatment. In the 70/845 (8.3%) patients with HER2-negative residual disease on retesting at surgery, there were 11 IDFS events in the 42 trastuzumab-treated patients (26.2%) and none in the 28 T-DM1-treated patients, suggesting that T-DM1 should not be withheld in this patient population.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36117201 PMCID: PMC9482917 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00477-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: NPJ Breast Cancer ISSN: 2374-4677
Fig. 1Analysis of outcomes in patients with HER2-negative vs HER2-positive residual disease upon retesting at surgery.
a Patient data assessed for this analysis is shown. Of the 1486 enrolled patients, two in the trastuzumab arm were excluded from the analysis, one without centrally confirmed HER2-positive breast cancer and another who was inadvertently randomized twice. Paired pre-NAST and residual disease samples were available for 845 patients. Patients with HER2-negative residual disease (n = 70) include 53 with confirmed HER2-negative disease and 17 with unknown HER2-status (IHC 0–1+/ISH unknown). b Kaplan–Meier estimates of time to first IDFS event in each treatment arm are shown. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, IDFS invasive disease-free survival, NAST neoadjuvant systemic therapy, NE not estimable, and T-DM1 trastuzumab emtansine.
Baseline characteristics by HER2 status in residual disease at surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy.
| Characteristic, No. (%)a | All ( | Patients with residual disease assessed as HER2-positive on retest ( | Patients with residual disease assessed as HER2-negative upon retest | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All ( | Trastuzumab ( | T-DM1 ( | |||
| Sample used for study eligibilityb | |||||
| Presurgical | 1195 (80.4) | 775 (100) | 70 (100) | 42 (100) | 28 (100) |
| Surgical | 289 (19.4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Median age (range), y | 49 (23–80) | 49 (23–80) | 49 (27–73) | 48.5 (27–73) | 52 (33–73) |
| Sex | |||||
| Female | 1481 (99.7) | 773 (99.7) | 70 (100) | 42 (100) | 28 (100) |
| Male | 5 (0.3) | 2 (0.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Racec | |||||
| White | 1082 (72.8) | 581 (75.0) | 54 (77.1) | 33 (78.6) | 21 (75.0) |
| Asian | 129 (8.7) | 68 (8.8) | 5 (7.1) | 2 (4.8) | 3 (10.7) |
| American Indian, Alaska Native, or Pacific Islander | 87 (5.9) | 35 (4.5) | 3 (4.3) | 3 (7.1) | 0 |
| Black or African American | 40 (2.7) | 20 (2.6) | 2 (2.9) | 1 (2.4) | 1 (3.6) |
| Multiple/Unknown | 148 (10.0) | 71 (9.2) | 6 (8.6) | 3 (7.1) | 3 (10.7) |
| Clinical stage at presentation | |||||
| Operable | 1111 (74.8) | 590 (76.1) | 50 (71.4) | 31 (73.8) | 19 (67.9) |
| Inoperable | 375 (25.2) | 185 (23.9) | 20 (28.6) | 11 (26.2) | 9 (22.1) |
| Hormone receptor status | |||||
| ER-negative and PgR-negative/unknown | 412 (27.7) | 196 (25.3) | 17 (24.3) | 11 (26.2) | 6 (21.4) |
| ER- and/or PgR-positive | 1074 (72.3) | 579 (74.7) | 53 (75.7) | 31 (73.8) | 22 (78.6) |
| Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy | |||||
| Trastuzumab alone | 1196 (80.5) | 636 (82.1) | 49 (70.0) | 27 (64.3) | 22 (78.6) |
| Trastuzumab + additional HER2-targeted agent | 290 (19.5) | 139 (17.9) | 21 (30.0) | 15 (35.7) | 6 (21.4) |
| HER2 status by IHC at eligibility screeningd | |||||
| IHC0/1+ | 25 (1.7) | 11 (1.4) | 3 (4.3) | 2 (4.8) | 1 (3.6) |
| IHC2+ | 326 (21.9) | 136 (17.5) | 25 (35.7) | 16 (38.1) | 9 (32.1) |
| IHC3+ | 1132 (76.2) | 627 (80.9) | 42 (60.0) | 24 (57.1) | 18 (64.3) |
| Unknown | 3 (0.2) | 1 (0.1) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| <2 | 11 (0.7) | 8 (1.0) | 1 (1.4) | 0 | 1 (3.6) |
| 2 to <4 | 422 (28.4) | 197 (25.4) | 29 (41.4) | 19 (45.2) | 10 (35.7) |
| ≥4 | 982 (66.1) | 540 (69.7) | 34 (48.6) | 23 (54.8) | 11 (39.3) |
| Missing | 71 (4.8) | 30 (3.9) | 6 (8.6) | 0 | 6 (21.4) |
| <4 | 21 (1.4) | 11 (1.4) | 4 (5.7) | 3 (7.1) | 1 (3.6) |
| 4 to <6 | 183 (12.3) | 81 (10.5) | 12 (17.1) | 7 (16.7) | 5 (17.9) |
| ≥6 | 1211 (81.5) | 653 (84.3) | 48 (68.6) | 32 (76.2) | 16 (57.1) |
| Missing | 71 (4.8) | 30 (3.9) | 6 (8.6) | 0 | 6 (21.4) |
| HER2 heterogeneitye at eligibility screeningd | |||||
| Focal (<30%) | 166 (11.2) | 65 (8.4) | 20 (28.6) | 12 (28.6) | 8 (28.6) |
| Heterogeneous (30–79%) | 325 (21.9) | 151 (19.5) | 20 (28.6) | 11 (26.2) | 9 (32.1) |
| Homogeneous (≥80%) | 992 (66.8) | 558 (72.0) | 30 (42.9) | 19 (45.2) | 11 (39.3) |
| Missing | 3 (0.2) | 1 (0.1) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Median | n/af | ( | ( | ( | ( |
aData are No. (%) unless otherwise indicated.
bTwo patients in the IHC2+/ISH+ subgroup were deemed HER2-positive based on the DAKO IQFISH pharmDx test and had an unknown Ventana DDISH test result.
cRace data were provided by patient self-report (patient-defined race options).
dFor the ITT population, these data may have been from specimens obtained prior to neoadjuvant therapy or at surgery.
eTumors were categorized into HER2 IHC2+/3+ heterogeneity categories based on the percentage of cells that stained positive for HER2. If the percentage of cells that stained positive for HER2 was <30%, the tumor was categorized as HER2 focal; if the percentage was 30–79%, the tumor was categorized as HER2 heterogeneous, and if the percentage was ≥80%, the tumor was categorized as HER2 homogeneous. Tumors were analyzed using the sum of complete membrane staining with IHC2+/3+ intensity.
fHER2 gene expression assessed for this analysis was based on RNA sequencing analysis which was performed only on evaluable samples obtained at surgery after neoadjuvant therapy.