Literature DB >> 26704052

Changes in tumor expression of HER2 and hormone receptors status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 21,755 patients from the Japanese breast cancer registry.

N Niikura1, A Tomotaki2, H Miyata2, T Iwamoto3, M Kawai4, K Anan5, N Hayashi6, K Aogi7, T Ishida8, H Masuoka9, K Iijima10, S Masuda11, K Tsugawa12, T Kinoshita13, S Nakamura14, Y Tokuda15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigate rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) and tumor expression of ER, PgR, HER2 discordance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy using Japanese breast cancer registry data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of more than 300,000 breast cancer cases treated at 800 hospitals from 2004 to 2013 were retrieved from the breast cancer registry. After data cleanup, we included 21,755 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had no distant metastases. pCR was defined as no invasive tumor in the breast detected during surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. HER2 overexpression was determined immunohistochemically and/or using fluorescence in situ hybridization.
RESULTS: pCR was achieved in 5.7% of luminal tumors (n = 8730), 24.6% of HER2-positive tumors (n = 4403), and 18.9% of triple-negative tumors (n = 3660). Among HER2-positive tumors, pCR was achieved in 31.6% of ER-negative tumors (n = 2252), 17.0% of ER-positive ones (n = 2132), 31.4% of patients who received trastuzumab as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 2437), and 16.2% of patients who did not receive trastuzumab (n = 1966). Of the 2811 patients who were HER2-positive before treatment, 601 (21.4%) had HER2-negative tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas 340 (3.4%) of the 9947 patients with HER2-negative tumors before treatment had HER2-positive tumors afterward. Of the 10,973 patients with ER-positive tumors before treatment, 499 (4.6%) had ER-negative tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas 519 (9.3%) of the 5607 patients who were ER-negative before treatment had ER-positive tumors afterward.
CONCLUSION: We confirmed that loss of HER2-positive status can occur after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with primary HER2-positive breast cancer. We also confirmed that in practice, differences in pCR rates between breast cancer subtypes are the same as in clinical trials. Our data strongly support the need for retest ER, PgR, HER2 of surgical sample after neoadjuvant therapy in order to accurately determine appropriate use of targeted therapy.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HER2; breast cancer; chemotherapy; in situ hybridization; neoadjuvant therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26704052     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  33 in total

1.  Intratumoral Estrogen Receptor Heterogeneity of Expression in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer as Evaluated by a Brightfield Multiplex Assay.

Authors:  Shinobu Masuda; Hiroaki Nitta; Brian D Kelly; Wenjun Zhang; Michael Farrell; Eslie Dennis
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  Alterations in Breast Cancer Biomarkers Following Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Srivarshini Cherukupalli Mohan; Sarah Walcott-Sapp; Minna K Lee; Marissa K Srour; Sungjin Kim; Farin F Amersi; Armando E Giuliano; Alice P Chung
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Evaluation of [89Zr]trastuzumab-PET/CT in differentiating HER2-positive from HER2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Farrokh Dehdashti; Ningying Wu; Ron Bose; Michael J Naughton; Cynthia X Ma; Bernadette V Marquez-Nostra; Philipp Diebolder; Cedric Mpoy; Buck E Rogers; Suzanne E Lapi; Richard Laforest; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Loss of HER2 and disease prognosis after neoadjuvant treatment of HER2+ breast cancer.

Authors:  Francisco P Branco; Duarte Machado; Filipa F Silva; Saudade André; Ana Catarino; Rosa Madureira; João M Pinto; João P Godinho; Pedro D Simões; Margarida Brito; Mafalda Casa-Nova; António R Moreira; José L Passos-Coelho
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 5.  Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in geriatric breast cancer patients: a National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis.

Authors:  Lauren Brown; Samer A Naffouje; Christine Sam; Christine Laronga; M Catherine Lee
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 4.624

Review 6.  Challenges and Opportunities for Immunoprofiling Using a Spatial High-Plex Technology: The NanoString GeoMx® Digital Spatial Profiler.

Authors:  Sharia Hernandez; Rossana Lazcano; Alejandra Serrano; Steven Powell; Larissa Kostousov; Jay Mehta; Khaja Khan; Wei Lu; Luisa M Solis
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Loss of human epidermal receptor-2 in human epidermal receptor-2+ breast cancer after neoadjuvant treatment: A case report.

Authors:  Jing Yu; Nan-Lin Li
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 1.534

8.  Modeling Neoadjuvant chemotherapy resistance in vitro increased NRP-1 and HER2 expression and converted MCF7 breast cancer subtype.

Authors:  Noura Al-Zeheimi; Sirin A Adham
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 9.  Translating neoadjuvant therapy into survival benefits: one size does not fit all.

Authors:  Leticia De Mattos-Arruda; Ronglai Shen; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Javier Cortés
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  Heterogeneity within molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Kevin M Turner; Syn Kok Yeo; Tammy M Holm; Elizabeth Shaughnessy; Jun-Lin Guan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.