Literature DB >> 3611527

The glycemic index: similarity of values derived in insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients.

T M Wolever, D J Jenkins, R G Josse, G S Wong, R Lee.   

Abstract

To see whether relative differences in the glycemic responses to different foods were similar in insulin-dependent (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients (NIDDM) we determined the glycemic index (GI) of a total of 20 foods and mixed test meals in groups of IDDM and NIDDM volunteers. The mean GI values ranged from 32 in NIDDM and 41 in IDDM (pearled barley) to 105 in NIDDM and 111 in IDDM (bread with cheese and tomato). The correlation between the mean GI values in IDDM and NIDDM was highly significant (r = 0.927, p less than 0.001). The mean GI values for 15 of the 20 test meals was greater in IDDM than in NIDDM (mean of GI for all 20 foods, 76 in IDDM compared with 68 in NIDDM, p less than 0.005). However, the difference in GI between IDDM and NIDDM was t statistically significant for 19 of the 20 individual test meals. Greater within-individual variability of glycemic responses in IDDM probably accounts for the slightly greater mean GI value seen in IDDM compared with NIDDM. The addition of 32 g cheddar cheese to four foods which were also fed without cheese had no significant effect on the GI in NIDDM (mean GI of 68 without cheese compared with 72 for the meals with cheese), but had a small effect in IDDM where the mean GI was increased from 72 to 87 (p less than 0.05). However, despite small increases in glycemic response to foods with added cheese, the relative differences between foods were unaffected by the addition of cheese in both IDDM and NIDDM. It is concluded that mean GI values for foods are very similar in IDDM and NIDDM patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3611527     DOI: 10.1080/07315724.1987.10720191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr        ISSN: 0731-5724            Impact factor:   3.169


  5 in total

1.  Estimating the reliability of glycemic index values and potential sources of methodological and biological variability.

Authors:  Nirupa R Matthan; Lynne M Ausman; Huicui Meng; Hocine Tighiouart; Alice H Lichtenstein
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Influence of oral antidiabetic drugs on hyperglycemic response to foods in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring system: a pilot study.

Authors:  Peterson Karolina; Rudolf Chlup; Zapletalova Jana; Klaus Dieter Kohnert; Pavla Kudlova; Josef Bartek; Marie Nakladalova; Blanka Doubravova; Pavel Seckar
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

3.  Comparable postprandial glucose reductions with viscous fiber blend enriched biscuits in healthy subjects and patients with diabetes mellitus: acute randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Alexandra L Jenkins; David J A Jenkins; Thomas M S Wolever; Alexander L Rogovik; Elena Jovanovski; Velimir Bozikov; Dario Rahelić; Vladimir Vuksan
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.351

4.  The Role of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load in the Development of Real-Time Postprandial Glycemic Response Prediction Models for Patients With Gestational Diabetes.

Authors:  Evgenii Pustozerov; Aleksandra Tkachuk; Elena Vasukova; Aleksandra Dronova; Ekaterina Shilova; Anna Anopova; Faina Piven; Tatiana Pervunina; Elena Vasilieva; Elena Grineva; Polina Popova
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Glycemic Index and Load of Selected Ethiopian Foods: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Nebiyu Dereje; Gadise Bekele; Yemisrach Nigatu; Yoseph Worku; Roger P Holland
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.011

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.