Literature DB >> 3611513

Infant speech-sound discrimination testing: effects of stimulus intensity and procedural model on measures of performance.

R J Nozza.   

Abstract

Performance of infants in a speech-sound discrimination task (/ba/ vs /da/) was measured at three stimulus intensity levels (50, 60, and 70 dB SPL) using the operant head-turn procedure. The procedure was modified so that data could be treated as though from a single-interval (yes-no) procedure, as is commonly done, as well as if from a sustained attention (vigilance) task. Discrimination performance changed significantly with increase in intensity, suggesting caution in the interpretation of results from infant discrimination studies in which only single stimulus intensity levels within this range are used. The assumptions made about the underlying methodological model did not change the performance-intensity relationships. However, infants demonstrated response decrement, typical of vigilance tasks, which supports the notion that the head-turn procedure is represented best by the vigilance model. Analysis then was done according to a method designed for tasks with undefined observation intervals [C. S. Watson and T. L. Nichols, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59, 655-668 (1976)]. Results reveal that, while group data are reasonably well represented across levels of difficulty by the fixed-interval model, there is a variation in performance as a function of time following trial onset that could lead to underestimation of performance in some cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3611513     DOI: 10.1121/1.394757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Selecting and Pre-setting Amplification for Children: Where Do We Begin?

Authors:  D E Lewis
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-06

2.  Assessment: scientific foundation.

Authors:  R J Nozza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-06

Review 3.  The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm.

Authors:  Susan Scollie; Richard Seewald; Leonard Cornelisse; Sheila Moodie; Marlene Bagatto; Diana Laurnagaray; Steve Beaulac; John Pumford
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

4.  Auditory perception skills in children receiving simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants: early speech-discrimination results.

Authors:  Selvet Akkaplan; Merve Ozbal Batuk; Gonca Sennaroglu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Acoustic Change Complex and Visually Reinforced Infant Speech Discrimination Measures of Vowel Contrast Detection.

Authors:  Barbara K Cone; Spencer Smith; Diane E Cheek Smith
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Perception of the pitch of unresolved harmonics by 3- and 7-month-old human infants.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Dynamics of infant cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) for tone and speech tokens.

Authors:  Barbara Cone; Richard Whitaker
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 1.675

8.  Refining Stimulus Parameters in Assessing Infant Speech Perception Using Visual Reinforcement Infant Speech Discrimination: Sensation Level.

Authors:  Kristin M Uhler; Rosalinda Baca; Emily Dudas; Tammy Fredrickson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Refining Stimulus Parameters in Assessing Infant Speech Perception Using Visual Reinforcement Infant Speech Discrimination in Infants with and without Hearing Loss: Presentation Level.

Authors:  Kristin M Uhler; René H Gifford; Jeri E Forster; Melinda Anderson; Elyse Tierney; Stacy D Claycomb; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Speech Discrimination in Infancy Predicts Language Outcomes at 30 Months for Both Children with Normal Hearing and Those with Hearing Differences.

Authors:  Kristin M Uhler; Sean R Anderson; Christine Yoshinaga-Itano; Kerry A Walker; Sharon Hunter
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.964

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.