Literature DB >> 23722003

Dynamics of infant cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) for tone and speech tokens.

Barbara Cone1, Richard Whitaker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) to tones and speech sounds were obtained in infants to: (1) further knowledge of auditory development above the level of the brainstem during the first year of life; (2) establish CAEP input-output functions for tonal and speech stimuli as a function of stimulus level and (3) elaborate the data-base that establishes CAEP in infants tested while awake using clinically relevant stimuli, thus providing methodology that would have translation to pediatric audiological assessment. Hypotheses concerning CAEP development were that the latency and amplitude input-output functions would reflect immaturity in encoding stimulus level. In a second experiment, infants were tested with the same stimuli used to evoke the CAEPs. Thresholds for these stimuli were determined using observer-based psychophysical techniques. The hypothesis was that the behavioral thresholds would be correlated with CAEP input-output functions because of shared cortical response areas known to be active in sound detection.
DESIGN: 36 infants, between the ages of 4 and 12 months (mean=8 months, s.d.=1.8 months) and 9 young adults (mean age 21 years) with normal hearing were tested. First, CAEPs amplitude and latency input-output functions were obtained for 4 tone bursts and 7 speech tokens. The tone bursts stimuli were 50 ms tokens of pure tones at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 kHz. The speech sound tokens, /a/, /i/, /o/, /u/, /m/, /s/, and /∫/, were created from natural speech samples and were also 50 ms in duration. CAEPs were obtained for tone burst and speech token stimuli at 10 dB level decrements in descending order from 70 dB SPL. All CAEP tests were completed while the infants were awake and engaged in quiet play. For the second experiment, observer-based psychophysical methods were used to establish perceptual threshold for the same speech sound and tone tokens.
RESULTS: Infant CAEP component latencies were prolonged by 100-150 ms in comparison to adults. CAEP latency-intensity input output functions were steeper in infants compared to adults. CAEP amplitude growth functions with respect to stimulus SPL are adult-like at this age, particularly for the earliest component, P1-N1. Infant perceptual thresholds were elevated with respect to those found in adults. Furthermore, perceptual thresholds were higher, on average, than levels at which CAEPs could be obtained. When CAEP amplitudes were plotted with respect to perceptual threshold (dB SL), the infant CAEP amplitude growth slopes were steeper than in adults.
CONCLUSIONS: Although CAEP latencies indicate immaturity in neural transmission at the level of the cortex, amplitude growth with respect to stimulus SPL is adult-like at this age, particularly for the earliest component, P1-N1. The latency and amplitude input-output functions may provide additional information as to how infants perceive stimulus level. The reasons for the discrepancy between electrophysiologic and perceptual threshold may be due to immaturity in perceptual temporal resolution abilities and the broad-band listening strategy employed by infants. The findings from the current study can be translated to the clinical setting. It is possible to use tonal or speech sound tokens to evoke CAEPs in an awake, passively alert infant, and thus determine whether these sounds activate the auditory cortex. This could be beneficial in the verification of hearing aid or cochlear implant benefit.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23722003      PMCID: PMC3700622          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  63 in total

1.  Improving evoked response audiometry. Results of normative studies for machine scoring.

Authors:  H Schimmel; I Rapin; M M Cohen
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1975

2.  Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli.

Authors:  M B Sachs; P J Abbas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory evoked responses during the first year of life.

Authors:  E S Ohlrich; A B Barnet
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-02

4.  Improving evoked response audiometry with special reference to the use of machine scoring.

Authors:  H Schimmel; I Rapin; M M Cohen
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1974 Jan-Feb

5.  Development of the cat peripheral auditory system: input-output functions of cochlear potentials.

Authors:  D R Moore
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-08-24       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Acoustically dependent latency shifts of BSER (wave V) in man.

Authors:  A J Klein; D C Teas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory evoked potential development in early childhood: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  E S Ohlrich; A B Barnet; I P Weiss; B L Shanks
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-04

8.  Some effects of stimulus intensity on response of auditory nerve fibers in the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  J E Rose; J E Hind; D J Anderson; J F Brugge
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Auditory evoked potentials during sleep in normal children from ten days to three years of age.

Authors:  A B Barnet
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-07

10.  Brain stem auditory evoked responses in human infants and adults.

Authors:  K Hecox; R Galambos
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1974-01
View more
  11 in total

1.  Clinical Experience of Using Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in the Treatment of Infant Hearing Loss in Australia.

Authors:  Simone Punch; Bram Van Dun; Alison King; Lyndal Carter; Wendy Pearce
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-02

2.  Detection Rates of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials at Different Sensation Levels in Infants with Sensory/Neural Hearing Loss and Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Kirsty Gardner-Berry; Hsiuwen Chang; Teresa Y C Ching; Sanna Hou
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-02

3.  Frontal cortex selectively overrides auditory processing to bias perception for looming sonic motion.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Mark H Myers
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Acoustic Change Complex and Visually Reinforced Infant Speech Discrimination Measures of Vowel Contrast Detection.

Authors:  Barbara K Cone; Spencer Smith; Diane E Cheek Smith
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Electrically Evoked Auditory Event-Related Responses in Patients with Auditory Brainstem Implants: Morphological Characteristics, Test-Retest Reliability, Effects of Stimulation Level, and Association with Auditory Detection.

Authors:  Shuman He; Tyler C McFayden; Holly F B Teagle; Matthew Ewend; Lillian Henderson; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Infant cortical electrophysiology and perception of vowel contrasts.

Authors:  Barbara K Cone
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Cortical Neurophysiologic Correlates of Auditory Threshold in Adults and Children With Normal Hearing and Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Garrett Cardon; Anu Sharma
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 1.493

8.  A Set of Time-and-Frequency-Localized Short-Duration Speech-Like Stimuli for Assessing Hearing-Aid Performance via Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Anisa Visram; James M Harte; Kevin J Munro
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Recording Obligatory Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Infants: Quantitative Information on Feasibility and Parent Acceptability.

Authors:  Kevin J Munro; Suzanne C Purdy; Kai Uus; Anisa Visram; Rachel Ward; Iain A Bruce; Antonia Marsden; Michael A Stone; Bram Van Dun
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Cortical auditory evoked potential in assessment of neonates: a study about minimum level of responses in term and preterm newborns.

Authors:  Dayane Domeneghini Didoné; Lilian Sanches Oliveira; Alessandra Spada Durante; Kátia de Almeida; Michele Vargas Garcia; Rudimar Dos Santos Riesgo; Pricila Sleifer
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.