Literature DB >> 36114313

Demographic reporting across a decade of neuroimaging: a systematic review.

Elijah Sterling1, Hannah Pearl2, Zexuan Liu3, Jason W Allen3,4,5, Candace C Fleischer6,7.   

Abstract

Diversity of participants in biomedical research with respect to race, ethnicity, and biological sex is crucial, particularly given differences in disease prevalence, recovery, and survival rates between demographic groups. The objective of this systematic review was to report on the demographics of neuroimaging studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The Web of Science database was used and data collection was performed between June 2021 to November 2021; all articles were reviewed independently by at least two researchers. Articles utilizing MR data acquired in the United States, with n ≥ 10 human subjects, and published between 2010-2020 were included. Non-primary research articles and those published in journals that did not meet a quality control check were excluded. Of the 408 studies meeting inclusion criteria, approximately 77% report sex, 10% report race, and 4% report ethnicity. Demographic reporting also varied as function of disease studied, participant age range, funding, and publisher. We anticipate quantitative data on the extent, or lack, of reporting will be necessary to ensure inclusion of diverse populations in biomedical research.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Demographic reporting; MRI; NIH Revitalization Act of 1993; Neuroimaging

Year:  2022        PMID: 36114313     DOI: 10.1007/s11682-022-00724-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav        ISSN: 1931-7557            Impact factor:   3.224


  62 in total

1.  Moving toward true inclusion of racial/ethnic minorities in federally funded studies. A key step for achieving respiratory health equality in the United States.

Authors:  Esteban G Burchard; Sam S Oh; Marilyn G Foreman; Juan C Celedón
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research.

Authors:  Annaliese K Beery; Irving Zucker
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  Unethical human research in the field of neuroscience: a historical review.

Authors:  Hussein Algahtani; Mohammed Bajunaid; Bader Shirah
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Cerebral cortical folding analysis with multivariate modeling and testing: Studies on gender differences and neonatal development.

Authors:  Suyash P Awate; Paul A Yushkevich; Zhuang Song; Daniel J Licht; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The genetic ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bryc; Eric Y Durand; J Michael Macpherson; David Reich; Joanna L Mountain
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Racial Differences in Insular Connectivity and Thickness and Related Cognitive Impairment in Hypertension.

Authors:  Ganesh B Chand; Junjie Wu; Deqiang Qiu; Ihab Hajjar
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 7.  Neuroimaging advances in Parkinson's disease with freezing of gait: A systematic review.

Authors:  Komal Bharti; Antonio Suppa; Silvia Tommasin; Alessandro Zampogna; Sara Pietracupa; Alfredo Berardelli; Patrizia Pantano
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 8.  Considering Biological Sex in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Anat Biegon
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Outcome after acute ischemic stroke is linked to sex-specific lesion patterns.

Authors:  Anna K Bonkhoff; Markus D Schirmer; Martin Bretzner; Sungmin Hong; Robert W Regenhardt; Mikael Brudfors; Kathleen L Donahue; Marco J Nardin; Adrian V Dalca; Anne-Katrin Giese; Mark R Etherton; Brandon L Hancock; Steven J T Mocking; Elissa C McIntosh; John Attia; Oscar R Benavente; Stephen Bevan; John W Cole; Amanda Donatti; Christoph J Griessenauer; Laura Heitsch; Lukas Holmegaard; Katarina Jood; Jordi Jimenez-Conde; Steven J Kittner; Robin Lemmens; Christopher R Levi; Caitrin W McDonough; James F Meschia; Chia-Ling Phuah; Arndt Rolfs; Stefan Ropele; Jonathan Rosand; Jaume Roquer; Tatjana Rundek; Ralph L Sacco; Reinhold Schmidt; Pankaj Sharma; Agnieszka Slowik; Martin Söderholm; Alessandro Sousa; Tara M Stanne; Daniel Strbian; Turgut Tatlisumak; Vincent Thijs; Achala Vagal; Johan Wasselius; Daniel Woo; Ramin Zand; Patrick F McArdle; Bradford B Worrall; Christina Jern; Arne G Lindgren; Jane Maguire; Danilo Bzdok; Ona Wu; Natalia S Rost
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Lack of consideration of sex and gender in COVID-19 clinical studies.

Authors:  Emer Brady; Mathias Wullum Nielsen; Jens Peter Andersen; Sabine Oertelt-Prigione
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.