| Literature DB >> 36111060 |
Almudena Ortega-Gomez1,2, Sergio Lopez1,3,4, Lourdes M Varela1,4,5, Sara Jaramillo1, Francisco J G Muriana1, Rocio Abia1.
Abstract
Chronic administration of a high-fat diet in mice has been established to influence the generation and trafficking of immune cells such as neutrophils in the bone marrow, the dysregulation of which may contribute to a wide range of diseases. However, no studies have tested the hypothesis that a short-term, high-fat diet could early modulate the neutrophil release from bone marrow at fasting and at postprandial in response to a high-fat meal challenge, and that the predominant type of fatty acids in dietary fats could play a role in both context conditions. Based on these premises, we aimed to establish the effects of different fats [butter, enriched in saturated fatty acids (SFAs), olive oil, enriched in monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), and olive oil supplemented with eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA) acids] on neutrophil navigation from bone marrow to blood in mice. The analysis of cellular models for mechanistic understanding and of postprandial blood samples from healthy volunteers for translational purposes was assessed. The results revealed a powerful effect of dietary SFAs in promotion the neutrophil traffic from bone marrow to blood via the CXCL2-CXCR2 axis. Dietary SFAs, but not MUFAs or EPA and DHA, were also associated with increased neutrophil apoptosis and bone marrow inflammation. Similar dietary fatty-acid-induced postprandial neutrophilia was observed in otherwise healthy humans. Therefore, dietary MUFAs might preserve bone marrow health and proper migration of bone marrow neutrophils early in the course of high-fat diets even after the intake of high-fat meals.Entities:
Keywords: BMSF, bone marrow supernatant fluid; Bone marrow inflammation; Butter; Ct, threshold cycle; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; Dietary fatty acids; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; FSC, forward scatter; HBSS, Hank’s balance salt solution; HFDs, high-fat diets; HSCs, hematopoietic stem cells; High-fat diets; LFD, low-fat diet; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; MMP9, matrix metalloproteinase 9; MUFAs, monounsaturated fatty acids; Neutrophil mobilisation; OCM, oral control meal; OFLs, oral fat loads; OFMs, oral fat meals; OSL, oral saline load; Olive oil; PI, propidium iodide; PUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids; SFAs, saturated fatty acids; SSC, side scatter; TRLs, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
Year: 2022 PMID: 36111060 PMCID: PMC9467871 DOI: 10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100133
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem (Oxf) ISSN: 2666-5662
Fig. 1The type of dietary fat in high-fat diets (HFDs) and oral-fat loads (OFLs) modulates the number of neutrophils in the blood and bone marrow of C57BL/6J mice. Animals were fed a low-fat diet (LFD) or HFDs containing anhydrous butter (HFD-SFAs), olive oil (HFD-MUFAs) or olive oil plus EPA + DHA (HFD-MUFAs + EPA + DHA) for 4 weeks. Blood and bone marrow were obtained at fasting (at the end of the diet period, n = 9) and at postprandial (after the administration of the oral loads, n = 9). (A) Representative gating strategy and dot plots (SSC/FSC and CD11b/Ly6G) of neutrophils in the blood or bone marrow. Ly6C (central panels) was used as a marker to discriminate monocytes (blue dots) from neutrophils (pink dots). (B) Number of circulating neutrophils at fasting (white), and at postprandial after the animals received an oral-saline load (OSL) or an OFL of melted anhydrous butter (OFL-SFAs), olive oil (OFL-MUFAs) or olive oil plus EPA + DHA (OFL-MUFAs + EPA + DHA) (black). (C) Number of bone marrow neutrophils at fasting (white) and at postprandial (black). For all graphs, the bar heights reflect the mean and the error bars represent SD of nine independent biological replicates. *Significant difference of HFD or OFL compared to LFD or OSL. #Significant difference of postprandial value compared to fasting value within each dietary fat. Different letters assigned to fasting values (a and b) or to postprandial values (c and d) indicate significant differences between HFDs or OFLs. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 2The type of dietary fat in high-fat diets (HFDs), oral-fat loads (OFLs) and postprandial triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) modulates the level of apoptotic bone marrow neutrophils of C57BL/6J mice. Animals were fed a low-fat diet (LFD) or HFDs containing anhydrous butter (HFD-SFAs), olive oil (HFD-MUFAs) or olive oil plus EPA + DHA (HFD-MUFAs + EPA + DHA) for 4 weeks. Blood and bone marrow were obtained at fasting (at the end of the diet period, n = 9) and at postprandial (after the administration of the oral loads, n = 9). (A) Percentage of apoptotic bone marrow neutrophils at fasting (white), and at postprandial after the animals received an oral-saline load (OSL) or an OFL of melted anhydrous butter (OFL-SFAs), olive oil (OFL-MUFAs) or olive oil plus EPA + DHA (OFL-MUFAs + EPA + DHA) (black). (B) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CXCR4 in circulating neutrophils at fasting (white) and at postprandial (black). In the lower panel are reported merged representative dot plot and FACS histogram analyses of neutrophil CXCR4 expression in blood samples at fasting (purple) and at postprandial (orange). (C) Relative percentage of apoptotic mouse bone marrow neutrophils after incubation with staurosporine (200 nM) or human postprandial TRLs (100 μg of TGs/mL) for 12 h. The different TRLs were isolated from postprandial serum samples of healthy volunteers after the intake of oral-fat meals containing anhydrous butter (TRL-SFAs), olive oil (TRL-MUFAs) or olive oil plus a dose of EPA + DHA (TRL-MUFAs + EPA + DHA). For all graphs, the bar heights reflect the mean and the error bars represent SD of nine independent biological replicates. *Significant difference of HFD or OFL compared to LFD or OSL. #Significant difference of postprandial value compared to fasting value within each dietary fat. Different letters assigned to fasting values (a and b) or to postprandial values (c and d) indicate significant differences between HFDs or OFLs. $Significant difference of the treatment compared to untreated (control) cells. Different letters (e and f) indicate significant differences between postprandial TRLs. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3The type of dietary fat in high-fat diets (HFDs) and oral-fat loads (OFLs) modulates the presence of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α in bone marrow supernatant fluid (BMSF) and serum of C57BL/6J mice. Animals were fed a low-fat diet (LFD) or HFDs containing anhydrous butter (HFD-SFAs), olive oil (HFD-MUFAs) or olive oil plus EPA + DHA (HFD-MUFAs + EPA + DHA) for 4 weeks. Serum and BMSF were obtained at fasting (at the end of the diet period, n = 9) and at postprandial (after the administration of the oral loads, n = 9). (A) Levels of IL-1β in BMSF at fasting (white) and at postprandial after the animals received an oral-saline load (OSL) or an OFL of melted anhydrous butter (OFL-SFAs), olive oil (OFL-MUFAs) or olive oil plus EPA + DHA (OFL-MUFAs + EPA + DHA) (black). (B) Levels of IL-1β in the serum at fasting (white) and at postprandial (black). (C) Levels of IL-6 in BMSF at fasting (white) and at postprandial (black). (D) Levels of IL-6 in the serum at fasting (white) and at postprandial (black). (E) Levels of TNF-α in BMSF at fasting (white) and at postprandial (black). (F) Levels of TNF-α in the serum at fasting (white) and at postprandial (black). For all graphs, the bar heights reflect the mean and the error bars represent SD of nine independent biological replicates. *Significant difference of HFD or OFL compared to LFD or OSL. #Significant difference of postprandial value compared to fasting value within each dietary fat. Different letters assigned to fasting values (a and b) or to postprandial values (c, d and e) indicate significant differences between HFDs or OFLs.
Fig. 4The type of dietary fat in high-fat diets (HFDs), oral-fat loads (OFLs) and postprandial triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) modulates the bone marrow neutrophil CXCL2-CXCR2 axis and migration of C57BL/6J mice. Animals were fed a low-fat diet (LFD) or HFDs containing anhydrous butter (HFD-SFAs), olive oil (HFD-MUFAs) or olive oil plus EPA + DHA (HFD-MUFAs + EPA + DHA) for 4 weeks. Serum and bone marrow were obtained at fasting (at the end of the diet period, n = 9) and at postprandial (after the administration of the oral loads, n = 9). (A) Relative expression of CXCL2 gene in bone marrow cells at fasting (white), and at postprandial after the animals received an oral-saline load (OSL) or an OFL of melted anhydrous butter (OFL-SFAs), olive oil (OFL-MUFAs) or olive oil plus EPA + DHA (OFL-MUFAs + EPA + DHA) (black). (B) Relative expression of CXCL2 gene in SVEC4-10 cells after incubation with human postprandial TRLs (100 μg of TGs/mL) for 12 h. The different TRLs were isolated from postprandial serum samples of healthy volunteers after the intake of oral-fat meals containing anhydrous butter (TRL-SFAs), olive oil (TRL-MUFAs) or olive oil plus a dose of EPA + DHA (TRL-MUFAs + EPA + DHA). (C) Relative expression of CXCR2 in bone marrow neutrophils at fasting (white) and at postprandial (black). (D) Levels of CXCL2 in the serum of mice at fasting (white) and at postprandial (black). (E) Bone marrow neutrophil migration across SVEC4-10 cells with postprandial TRLs, CXCL2 (100 ng/mL) and a CXCR2 inhibitor (200 nM) as indicated. For all graphs, the bar heights reflect the mean and the error bars represent SD of nine independent biological replicates. *Significant difference of HFD or OFL compared to LFD or OSL. #Significant difference of postprandial value compared to fasting value within each dietary fat. Different letters assigned to fasting values (a and b) or to postprandial values (c, d and e) indicate significant differences between HFDs or OFLs. $Significant difference of the treatment compared to untreated cells. ¥Significant difference of the treatment with postprandial TRLs compared to CXCL2-treated cells. Different letters (f, g and h) indicate significant differences between postprandial TRLs.
Fig. 5The type of dietary fat in high-fat diets (HFDs) and oral-fat loads (OFLs) modulates the bone marrow neutrophil CXCL12-CXCR4 axis of C57BL/6J mice. Animals were fed a low-fat diet (LFD) or HFDs containing anhydrous butter (HFD-SFAs), olive oil (HFD-MUFAs) or olive oil plus EPA + DHA (HFD-MUFAs + EPA + DHA) for 4 weeks. Bone marrow was obtained at fasting (at the end of the diet period, n = 9) and at postprandial (after the administration of the oral loads, n = 9). (A) Relative expression of CXCL12 gene in bone marrow cells at fasting (white), and at postprandial after the animals received an oral-saline load (OSL) or an OFL of melted anhydrous butter (OFL-SFAs), olive oil (OFL-MUFAs) or olive oil plus EPA + DHA (OFL-MUFAs + EPA + DHA) (black). (B) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CXCR4 in bone marrow neutrophils at fasting (white) and at postprandial (black). For all graphs, the bar heights reflect the mean and the error bars represent SD of nine independent biological replicates. *Significant difference of HFD or OFL compared to LFD or OSL. #Significant difference of postprandial value compared to fasting value within each dietary fat. Different letters assigned to fasting values (a and b) or to postprandial values (c and d) indicate significant differences between HFDs or OFLs.
Fig. 6The type of dietary fat in planned diets for 1 week and in high-fat meals (HFMs) modulates the number of neutrophils in the blood of healthy volunteers. Twelve participants were provided 1 week of planned menus with the inclusion of anhydrous butter (SFA diet), olive oil (MUFA diet) or olive oil plus EPA + DHA (MUFA + EPA + DHA diet). Blood (and plasma) was obtained at fasting (at the end of the pre-challenge period) and at postprandial (after the administration of the meals). (A) Number of circulating neutrophils at postprandial after the participants ingested an oral-control meal (OCM) with no fat or an OFM containing anhydrous butter (OFM-SFAs), olive oil (OFM-MUFAs) or olive oil plus EPA + DHA (OFM-MUFAs + EPA + DHA). (B) Relative expression of MMP9 gene in circulating neutrophils at postprandial. (C) Levels of MMP9 in plasma at fasting (white) and at postprandial (black). For all graphs, the bar heights reflect the mean and the error bars represent SD of twelve independent biological replicates. *Significant difference of OFMs compared to OCM. Different letters (a and b) indicate significant differences between OFMs. #Significant difference of diets enriched in SFAs, MUFAs or MUFAs + EPA + DHA for 1 week period or OFMs compared to control diet or OCM. $Significant difference of postprandial value compared to fasting value within each dietary fat. Different letters assigned to fasting values (c and d) or to postprandial values (e and f) indicate significant differences between diets enriched in SFAs, MUFAs or MUFAs + EPA + DHA for 1 week period or between OFMs.