| Literature DB >> 36110458 |
Sadia Ejaz1, Neeharika Nandam2, Susan Maygarden3, Maya Styner1.
Abstract
Capable of generating excess catecholamines, untreated extra-adrenal paragangliomas (PGLs) result in severe cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Increasingly, a hereditary basis can be identified to underlie PGLs, though such data are largely absent in populations of non-European descent. We present two patients with PGL, both exhibiting similar age, sex, and geographic ancestry. Our patients are unrelated, Kinyarwanda-speaking females from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The first patient presented with lower extremity edema and poorly controlled hypertension and was found to have multifocal PGL in the abdomen and bladder, proven by biopsy and treated with surgical excision. Our second patient presented with palpitations, shortness of breath, headache, and hypertension, was found to have mediastinal PGL, and underwent surgical excision. Genetic testing was negative in both cases. The first patient has not shown recurrence based on active surveillance with imaging and biochemical testing. There is a concern for recurrence in the second patient, eight years after diagnosis, which is currently being investigated. Our second patient lived at a high altitude for most of her life, pointing toward a possible role of hypoxia in the pathogenesis of her tumor development. Our cases raise questions that require active inquiry regarding additional environmental and/or genetic factors that might predispose to PGLs in uncommon anatomic sites and in understudied, vulnerable populations.Entities:
Keywords: african ancestry; genetic risk; paraganglioma; pheochromocytoma; precision medicine
Year: 2022 PMID: 36110458 PMCID: PMC9462397 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27854
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Clinical characteristics prior to and after PGL tumor resection in case one and case two.
NM: normetanephrine; M: metanephrine; NE: norepinephrine, E: epinephrine; VMA: vanillylmandelic acid; TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone; CgA: chromogranin A; MIBG: metaiodobenzylguanidine, 18F-FDG-PET/CT: fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography; GeneDx panel PCC/PGL: variants including FH, MAX, MEN2, NF1, RET, SDHA, SDHAF2, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, TMEM127, and VHL; Invitae Hereditary PCC/PGL: variants including MAX, NF1, RET, SDHA, SDHAF2, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, TMEM127, and VHL genes.
| Test | Case 1 | Reference Range | Test | Case 2 | Reference range | ||
| Before surgery | After surgery | Before surgery | After surgery | ||||
| Plasma-free fractionated NM (pg/mL) | 253 (H) | 98 | 0–145 | Plasma-free fractionated NM (nmol/L) | 7.1 (H) | 0.55 | <0.90 |
| Plasma-free fractionated M (pg/mL) | <10 | 18 | 0–62 | Plasma-free fractionated (M nmol/L) | 0.22 | 0.25 | <0.50 |
| Urine NE (µg/24 hour) | 184 (H) | 18 | 15–80 | Urine NE (µg/24 hour) | 16 | 15-80 | |
| Urine E (µg/24 hour) | <1.7 | <1.1 | <21 | Urine E (µg/24 hour) | 2.4 | <21 | |
| Urine dopamine (µg/24 hour) | 285 | 20 (L) | 65–400 | Urine dopamine (µg/24 hour) | 145 | 65-400 | |
| Urine M (µg/24 hour) | 94 | 88 | 30–180 (normotensive) <400 (hypertensive) | Urine M (µg/24 hour) | 101 | 30–180 (mormotensive) <400 (hypertensive) | |
| Urine NM (µg/24 hour) | 1404 (H) | 297 | 119–451 (normotensive) <900 (hypertensive) | Urine NM (µg/24 hour) | 224 | 119–451 (normotensive) <900 (hypertensive) | |
| Urine VMA (mg/24 hour) | 5.9 | 3.7 | <8 | Urine VMA (mg/24 hour) | 2.6 | <8 | |
| TSH (µIU/mL) | 1.19 | 1.36 | 0.34–5.66 | TSH (µIU/mL) | 1.84 | ||
| CgA (ng/mL) | <93 | 265 | 64 | <93 | |||
| Genetic testing | GeneDx PCC/PGL Panel: Neg | Invitae Hereditary PCC/PGL Panel: Negative | |||||
| Imaging studies | CT abdomen/pelvis with contrast: necrotic 3 cm mass likely from duodenum and less likely the pancreas, enhancing nodules in the bladder wall, prominent uterus and cervix | CT abdomen/pelvis with contrast: interval post-surgical findings from TAH/BSO, bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection, cystectomy with neobladder formation | CT chest with contrast: large heterogeneously enhancing mass beneath carina and posterior to the left atrium | ||||
| Whole body MIBG: MIBG avid aortocaval mass located just inferior to the uncinate process of the pancreas | Whole-body MIBG: there is no scintigraphic evidence of residual or recurrent MIBG-avid tumor | 18F- FDG- PET/CT: posterior mediastinal mass with marked FDG utilization with a maximum SUV of 37.5 | |||||
| Whole-body MIBG: increased radiotracer uptake within the known middle mediastinal mass | |||||||
Figure 1Case one pathology from bladder resection.
Sections of the bladder resection from Case one show a neoplasm composed of lightly eosinophilic epithelioid cells with moderate nuclear pleomorphism with a nested arrangement (termed “zellenballen” architecture). The epithelioid cells were positive for immunostains for neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56). Between the cell nests flattened sustentacular cells can be found which stained for GATA-3. Both populations of cells were negative for pankeratin immunostain. This mass was largely encapsulated without invasion into surrounding tissues (hematoxylin and eosin stain; A: 40× magnification, B: 400× magnification).
Figure 2Representative imaging and histology from case two with mediastinal paraganglioma.
Top panel (A) and (B) CT/FDG-PET showing posterior mediastinal mass demonstrating marked FDG utilization with a maximum SUV of 37.5. (C) MIBG showing increased radiotracer uptake within the known middle mediastinal mass. Bottom panel (D) and (E): Histologic features of case two. This neoplasm has similar underlying architecture to case one, with eosinophilic epithelioid cells with nested architecture. Immunostains were also similar, with the lesional cells positive for neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin, CD56, synaptophysin, and neuron-specific enolase) and the sustentacular cells positive for S-100. Both populations were negative for keratin stains. However, (D) shows that the tumor is not encapsulated and extends into the surrounding adipose tissue (arrow), and (E) shows very marked nuclear pleomorphism (arrowheads) and necrosis (arrows) (hematoxylin and eosin stain; D: 40×, E: 400×). While only metastases are definitive for a diagnosis of malignancy in paraganglioma, histologic features that are associated with malignancy include elevated mitotic rate, atypical mitoses, necrosis, spindling of tumor cells, capsular invasion, vascular invasion, and marked nuclear pleomorphism. This case demonstrates some of those features. Of note, it is case two who has some clinical concern, eight years after diagnosis, for recurrence, with a new suspicious lesion in the right kidney.
CT: computed tomography; FDG: fluorodeoxyglucose; MIBG: 123I metaiodobenzylguanidine PET: positron emission tomography; SUV: standardized uptake value