Literature DB >> 36109358

Less postoperative pain and shorter length of stay after robot-assisted retrorectus hernia repair (rRetrorectus) compared with laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for small or medium-sized ventral hernias.

Mette W Christoffersen1, Lars N Jørgensen2, Kristian K Jensen2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal repair of ventral hernia remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the results after robotic-assisted laparoscopic transabdominal repair with retrorectus mesh placement (rRetrorectus) compared with laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for patients with small- or medium-sized ventral hernia.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing elective rRetrorectus or IPOM repair for small or medium-sized primary ventral or incisional hernias. The primary outcome was the postoperative need for transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block or epidural analgesia, secondary outcomes were length of stay and postoperative complications. All patients were followed for 30 days postoperatively.
RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were included undergoing rRetrorectus (n = 27) and IPOM (n = 32). Patients in the two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, comorbidities, smoking status, body mass index (BMI), and type of hernia. The median fascial defect area was slightly larger in the rRetrorectus group (9 cm2 vs. 6.2 cm2, P = 0.031). The duration of surgery was longer for rRetrorectus (median 117.2 min. vs. 84.4, P = 0.003), whereas the postoperative need for TAP block or epidural analgesia was less after rRetrorectus compared with IPOM (3.7% versus 43.7%, P = 0.002). There were no severe complications or reoperations after either procedure. The length of stay was shorter after rRetrorectus (median 0 vs. 1 day, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: rRetrorectus was associated with reduced postoperative analgesic requirement and shorter length of stay compared with laparoscopic IPOM. Registration Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT05320055.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hernia repair; IPOM; Length of stay; Postoperative pain; Robotic-assisted; Ventral hernia

Year:  2022        PMID: 36109358     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09608-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  5 in total

Review 1.  Recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Kristian Kiim Jensen
Journal:  Dan Med J       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.240

2.  "Just stay at home" was lonely and terrifying.

Authors:  Lisa Jensen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-11-05

Review 3.  Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society.

Authors:  N A Henriksen; A Montgomery; R Kaufmann; F Berrevoet; B East; J Fischer; W Hope; D Klassen; R Lorenz; Y Renard; M A Garcia Urena; M P Simons
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Oscar A Olavarria; Karla Bernardi; Shinil K Shah; Todd D Wilson; Shuyan Wei; Claudia Pedroza; Elenir B Avritscher; Michele M Loor; Tien C Ko; Lillian S Kao; Mike K Liang
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-07-14

5.  Postoperative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective comparison of sutures versus tacks.

Authors:  Scott Q Nguyen; Celia M Divino; Kerri E Buch; Jessica Schnur; Kaare J Weber; L Brian Katz; Mark A Reiner; Robert A Aldoroty; Daniel M Herron
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.