Literature DB >> 18435881

Postoperative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective comparison of sutures versus tacks.

Scott Q Nguyen1, Celia M Divino, Kerri E Buch, Jessica Schnur, Kaare J Weber, L Brian Katz, Mark A Reiner, Robert A Aldoroty, Daniel M Herron.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mesh fixation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair typically involves the use of tacks, transabdominal permanent sutures, or both of these. We compared postoperative pain after repair with either of these 2 methods.
METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair at the Mount Sinai Medical Center were prospectively enrolled in the study. They were sorted into 2 groups (1) those undergoing hernia repairs consisting primarily of transabdominal suture fixation and (2) those undergoing hernia repairs consisting primarily of tack fixation. The patients were not randomized. The technique of surgical repair was based on surgeon preference. A telephone survey was used to follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: From 2004 through 2005, 50 patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-nine had hernia repair primarily with transabdominal sutures, and 21 had repair primarily with tacks. Both groups had similar average age, BMI, hernia defect size, operative time, and postoperative length of stay. Pain scores at 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months were similar. Both groups also had similar times to return to work and need for narcotic pain medication.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primarily transabdominal sutures or tacks experience similar postoperative pain. The choice of either of these fixation methods during surgery should not be based on risk of postoperative pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18435881      PMCID: PMC3016187     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JSLS        ISSN: 1086-8089            Impact factor:   2.172


INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair has grown in popularity since it was first reported in the early 1990s. Numerous studies have found it to have many advantages over traditional open repair.[1-3] Lower recurrence rates, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stays have led some to believe that it sets the new standard of care for ventral hernia repair.[1,2] Controversy exists regarding the optimal method to fix the prosthetic mesh to the anterior abdominal wall. Currently, the 2 most popular methods of mesh fixation are via transabdominal sutures and laparoscopic tacks. Sutures pass through all layers of the fascia and muscle of the anterior abdominal wall, while tacks secure the mesh to the innermost millimeters of the peritoneal cavity. Most controversy in laparoscopic repair centers on the tensile strength of the mesh fixation method. Recurrence is thought to be the result of inadequate or failed fixation. Postoperative pain produced by the securing methods is another consideration in deciding between sutures and tacks. Sutures are felt to cause worse and more persistent pain.[3,4] However, no comparative studies investigate which method truly causes more discomfort. This study compares these 2 methods and examines the consequential pain that occurs after each type of fixation.

METHODS

From 2004 through 2006, patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair by 8 different surgeons at the Mount Sinai Medical Center were prospectively enrolled in the study. Patients undergoing other simultaneous procedures were excluded. The patients were sorted into 2 groups[1]: those undergoing hernia repairs primarily with transabdominal sutures (Sutures Group) and[2] those undergoing hernia repairs primarily with tacks (Tacks Group). Patients in the Sutures Group had repairs with transabdominal sutures placed circumferentially approximately 2 cm to 3 cm apart. These patients typically had 10 to 20 sutures placed, depending on the size of hernia. Patients in the Tacks Group included those with hernias completely repaired with only tacks and repairs that may have involved 4 stay sutures with the rest of the mesh secured to the anterior abdominal wall with tacks. The patients were not randomized into these groups. Choice of repair was made by surgeon preference, including type of mesh and type of tacks. Patients' demographics and clinical data were prospectively recorded. Telephone follow-up was used to determine verbal pain scores at 1 week, 1 month, and 2 to 3 months postoperatively (0=pain free, 10=excruciating pain/worse pain ever). In addition, patients were asked regarding time to return to work and need for narcotic pain medications. Informed consent was obtained, and this study was approved by the institutional review board. We needed to enroll 50 patients into the study to detect a 50% difference in pain scores (Power 80%, Level of significance P=0.05).

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled in this study. Twenty-nine were in the Sutures Group and 21 in the Tacks Group. Demographics and clinical characteristics of the 2 groups are outlined in . Both groups were of similar age and body mass index (BMI). More females were in the Sutures Group. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of proportion of patients with recurrent hernias, multiple hernia defects, and total defect size. The type of mesh used was surgeon dependant and was variable across both groups. Demographics and Hernia Characteristics shows the operative and postoperative characteristics of the 2 groups. Both groups were similar in operative time. The Tacks Group had a longer length of postoperative hospital stay (2.4 vs 1.7 days); however, this difference was not statistically significant. There was no early recurrence during the follow-up period. The Tacks Group had a higher morbidity rate (19% vs 4%). The most common complications between the 2 groups were pneumonia and urinary retention. Operative and Postoperative Characteristics Differences between groups were determined by two tailed Student's t-tests. Verbal pain scores as reported via telephone interview are shown in . No difference was reported in mean pain scores between the 2 groups at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months (P>0.05). On a scale of 0 to 10, patients from both groups had moderate pain 1 week after the operation. Pain scores in both groups decreased at 1 month and were minimal by 2 to 3 months. In addition, use of narcotic pain medications during the postoperative period was similar in both groups (. A similar proportion of both groups required such pain medications at 1 week. Time to return to work was also similar between the groups. No patients required local anesthetic injection for chronic, persistent pain in either group. Mean postoperative pain scores at 1 week, 1 month, and 2 to 3 months after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. No difference in pain score existed between groups (P>0.05, 2-tailed Student t test). Postoperative Pain Assessment

DISCUSSION

The preferred method of mesh fixation during laparoscopic ventral hernia is controversial. Many proponents of the use of transabdominal sutures cite lower recurrence rates due to higher tensile holding strengths of sutures in comparison to tacks.[5,6] Other authors[6-8] argue that the use of tacks reduces surgical time considerably while maintaining similar recurrence rates. These authors also argue that the use of tacks significantly reduces postoperative pain. To date, most studies of mesh fixation during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair focus on the risk of recurrence. However, this is the only study that compares postoperative pain after hernia repair with sutures versus tacks. Anecdotally, pain is generally worse after repair with sutures than with tacks. Sutures penetrate through the full thickness of abdominal wall musculature and fascia. This has been theorized to cause local muscle ischemia resulting in severe pain postoperatively.[7] In addition, numerous sutures are typically needed around the perimeter of the hernia defect. Because mesh overlap on normal muscular fascia is usually aimed for around 3 cm to 5 cm, the circumference around which sutures must be secured becomes quite large. We found no difference in postoperative pain in patients undergoing hernia repair with sutures or tacks. Both groups had moderate pain at one week and minimal pain on further follow-up. It is possible that early pain caused by multiple tacks penetrating the parietal peritoneum is equivalent to the pain caused by transfascial sutures. In the long-term, both repairs seem to level off in terms of discomfort. Cobb et al[12] has also proposed that intercostal nerves may become entrapped within the transabdominal sutures causing chronic, persistent neuropathic pain. Series of repairs using transfascial sutures report persistent pain and discomfort in 1% to 6% of patients.[1-3,8,9] Most authors feel oral anti-inflammatory medications or injections of a local anesthetic can alleviate the symptoms in the majority of cases.[1,3,10,11] Others have reported re-explorations for persistent pain, finding immediate relief after the release of a suture from the site of symptoms.[12] None of the patients in our study had persistent pain severe enough to undergo local anesthetic injection or reoperation. The reports of persistent cases of pain seem to be isolated at one particular suture site, supporting the nerve entrapment theory. Pain from muscle ischemia would seem to be more generalized at all of the suture sites. Our data suggest that both methods of mesh fixation are generally not different in terms of their resultant postoperative pain. However, because our study only included 50 patients, occasional episodes of chronic persistent pain due to nerve entrapment are certainly possible if more patients were followed. Our findings are somewhat consistent with those of LeBlanc et al,[17] whose study noted that patients in the earlier half of their series had more pain. These patients had fewer sutures used, suggesting the use of these sutures was unrelated to postoperative pain. Though the use of laparoscopic tackers may seem to be simpler and faster, we did not find a significant difference in operative time between the 2 fixation methods. This is contrary to the general opinion that the use of tacks reduces surgical time.[1,4] Operative time during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair significantly involves extensive adhesiolysis and dissection of peritoneal contents from the anterior abdominal wall. Conceivably, surgeons may misinterpret the amount of time spent on the different phases of the operation and focus on time spent on mesh fixation. In our study, we did not specifically look at operative time during different components of the operation. Moreover, no other prospective studies compare operative time in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Therefore, the assumption that repair with transabdominal sutures takes longer than tack repair remains largely unproven. The limitations of this study center on the sample size. Fifty patients were followed, and comparisons were made between the 2 groups. Small differences in pain scale between the groups may be difficult to assess. However, large differences should be found. Considering that most anecdotal evidence suggests a large difference in pain experience, we feel our conclusions are still valid. In addition, although data were prospectively recorded, the patients in this study were not randomized to treatment arms. The type of repair was based on surgeon preference, as each had his or her own strong feeling regarding the best method of fixation. Larger controlled trials may be necessary to optimally determine which method contributes to the most pain.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primarily transabdominal sutures or tacks experience similar overall postoperative pain. Symptoms are moderate by the end of the first postoperative week and mild by 1 month. Occasional episodes of chronic, persistent suture site pain are possible and have been reported. Postoperative pain should be a minor factor when deciding between repair with sutures or tacks in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Table 1.

Demographics and Hernia Characteristics

Sutures (n = 29)Tacks (n = 21)
Age5257
M/F11/184/17
BMI (kg/m2)31.327.4
Recurrent5 (17%)5 (24%)
Multiple Defects8 (28%)6 (29%)
Mean Defect Size (cm2)10681
Mesh Type12 Composix EX15 Composix EX
15 Dualmesh5 Parietex
1 Dulex1 Dualmesh
1 Parietex
Table 2.

Operative and Postoperative Characteristics

Sutures (n = 29)Tacks (n = 21)P
Operative Time (min)132122p > 0.05*
Length of Stay (days)1.72.4p > 0.05*
Early Recurrence00
Morbidity1 (3%) Pneumonia4 (19%)
Urinary Retention: 2
Pulmonary Embolism: 1
Pneumonia: 1

Differences between groups were determined by two tailed Student's t-tests.

Table 3.

Postoperative Pain Assessment

Sutures (n = 29)Tacks (n = 21)
Narcotic Pain Meds > 1 wk12 (41%)8 (38%)
Return to Work by 1 wk10/20 (50%)5/12 (42%)
  17 in total

1.  Management of chronic postoperative pain following incisional hernia repair with Composix mesh: a report of two cases.

Authors:  K A LeBlanc; J M Whitaker
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2002-09-11       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias.

Authors:  William S Cobb; Kent W Kercher; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients.

Authors:  B T Heniford; A Park; B J Ramshaw; G Voeller
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Laparoscopic intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic patch repair of ventral hernia. Prospective comparison to open prefascial polypropylene mesh repair.

Authors:  E J DeMaria; J M Moss; H J Sugerman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Postoperative complications after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Incidence and treatment.

Authors:  D Berger; M Bientzle; A Müller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias.

Authors:  Harris H Parker; James M Nottingham; Raymond P Bynoe; Michael J Yost
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Tensile strength of mesh fixation methods in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  M van't Riet; P J de Vos van Steenwijk; G J Kleinrensink; E W Steyerberg; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernioplasty: lessons learned from 200 patients.

Authors:  K A LeBlanc; J M Whitaker; D E Bellanger; V K Rhynes
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Laparoscopic approach to incisional hernia.

Authors:  M A Carbajo; J C Martp del Olmo; J I Blanco; M Toledano; C de la Cuesta; C Ferreras; C Vaquero
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair (LIVH): an evolving outpatient technique.

Authors:  G Kevin Gillian; W Peter Geis; Gary Grover
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  35 in total

1.  Mesh fixation with a barbed anchor suture results in significantly less strangulation of the abdominal wall.

Authors:  Calvin Lyons; Rohan Joseph; Nilson Salas; Patrick R Reardon; Barbara L Bass; Brian J Dunkin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of long-term outcome and quality of life after laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias with suture fixation with and without tacks: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Virinder Kumar Bansal; Mahesh C Misra; Divya Babu; Paras Singhal; Keerthi Rao; Rajesh Sagar; Subodh Kumar; S Rajeshwari; Vimi Rewari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Prospective randomized trial of mesh fixation with absorbable versus nonabsorbable tacker in laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Elif Colak; Nuraydin Ozlem; Gultekin Ozan Kucuk; Recep Aktimur; Sadik Kesmer; Kadir Yildirim
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

4.  A prospective randomized study comparing suture mesh fixation versus tacker mesh fixation for laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias.

Authors:  Virinder Kumar Bansal; Mahesh C Misra; Subodh Kumar; Y Keerthi Rao; Paras Singhal; Amit Goswami; Sandeep Guleria; M K Arora; Anjolie Chabra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: is there an optimal mesh fixation technique? A systematic review.

Authors:  Emmelie Reynvoet; Ellen Deschepper; Xavier Rogiers; Roberto Troisi; Frederik Berrevoet
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Which should be the gold standard laparoscopic technique for handling Spigelian hernias?

Authors:  Alfredo Moreno-Egea; Álvaro Campillo-Soto; German Morales-Cuenca
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Introduction of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond®) for incisional hernia mesh repair.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Saito; Keisuke Kubota; Akihiro Okada; Tomoaki Deguchi; Junko Kuroda; Nobuhiro Nitori; Tomohisa Kadomura; Masashi Yoshida; Masaki Kitajima
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  [Intervention-specific complications of hernia surgery].

Authors:  U A Dietz; A Wiegering; C T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  J R Eriksen; P Poornoroozy; L N Jørgensen; B Jacobsen; H U Friis-Andersen; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques.

Authors:  Eelco Wassenaar; Ernst Schoenmaeckers; Johan Raymakers; Job van der Palen; Srdjan Rakic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.