| Literature DB >> 36105988 |
L F Chen1, H Yu1, J Zhang1, H Y Qin1.
Abstract
Microbial electrosynthesis (MES) is a potential energy transformation technology for the reduction of the greenhouse gas carbon oxide (CO2) into commercial chemicals. The major bottlenecks in the development of highly productive MES systems are the low bacterial loading, low electron transfer rate and low production of relevant chemicals, which limit the future potential for scaling up this process. Graphene has excellent electrical conductivity, remarkably high carrier mobility, special intrinsic mechanical strength, chemical stability, outstanding specific surface area, and biocompatibility. Therefore, in this regard, graphene can overcome these challenges and provide new opportunities. Graphene is suited for use as a cathode for increasing the bacterial loading and boosting the performance of MES. Over the last decade, graphene has been extensively developed and explored in MES. Graphene incorporation in cathodes can augment the surface area, reduce the resistance, and increase the electron transfer rate; thus, high current density, high coulombic efficiency, and high chemical production can be achieved. To better understand and further explore the modification of graphene-based materials as cathodes in MES systems, it is quite necessary to review and summarize recent developments in this field. Therefore, in this report, we briefly survey and discuss the up-to-date research activities regarding graphene in cathode modification and fabrication, with particular emphasis on their fabrication strategies and characterization, highlighting their key roles in MES systems, as well as presenting the challenges and the future prospects. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36105988 PMCID: PMC9376761 DOI: 10.1039/d2ra02038f
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1A diagram of CO2 capture by the microbial electrosynthesis of biochemicals from renewable energy and chemical energy utilization.
Fig. 2A schematic of the MES cathode development history and the various related biochemicals.
Fig. 3Schematic methods for constructing reduced graphene oxide.
Fig. 4(a) High-magnification SEM image of the 3D-G-CF cathode and (b) bent RGO paper to demonstrate its mechanical flexibility. (a) Adapted/reproduced from ref. 47 with permission from Elsevier Ltd, copyright 2016. (b) Adapted/reproduced from ref. 48 with permission from Springer Nature, copyright 2017.
Fig. 5(a) A model of electrostatic repulsion between negatively charged bacteria and RGO. (b) SEM image of the RGO-TEPA-CC cathode in the MES reactor driven by the S. ovata wild type. (b) Adapted/reproduced from ref. 54 with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2016.
Fig. 6(a) CLSM image of a freestanding RGO paper cathode. (b) FESEM image of CF/RGO NCs. (c) FESEM image of a biofilm for CF/RGO/CC. (d) Electrochemical impedance spectra of reduced graphene oxide with a magnetite nanoparticle-modified electrode (CF/RGOMNPs) and unmodified carbon felt electrode (CF) with or without an attached biofilm in a freshwater medium. (a) Adapted/reproduced from ref. 48 with permission from Springer Nature, copyright 2017. (b and c) Adapted/reproduced from ref. 72 with permission from Elsevier Ltd, copyright 2021. (d) Adapted/reproduced from ref. 73 with permission from IOP Publishing Ltd, copyright 2021.
A comparison of the surface areas of GP/GP-based composite cathodes with that of the reference material
| Cathode | Surface area | Chemical production rate | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| GP-CC | 2.99 m2 g−1, 2.2 fold compared to carbon cloth (1.36 m2 g−1) | 6.8 |
|
| RGO paper | 0.29 m2 g−1, 5.40 fold compared to carbon cloth (0.054 m2 g−1) | 8 |
|
| RGO-CuP | 1.130 m2 g−1, 161 fold compared to copper foam (0.007 m2 g−1) | 21.3 |
|
| CF/RGO | 158.2 m2 g−1, 2.24 fold compared to copper ferrite (64.7 m2 g−1) | 1.53 |
|
| MP-RGO | 0.824 cm2, 2.53 fold compared to carbon felt (0.326 cm2) | 4.2 |
|
Fig. 7The three possible ways of extracellular electron transfer mechanisms from the cathode to the microbial catalysts. SO is oxidized electron shuttle and SR is reduced electron shuttle.
MES performance of GP/GP-based composite cathodes and other nanomaterial-based cathodesa
| Cathode | Production | Production rate | Current densities | CE or FE (%) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G-CC | AC | 925.5 mMm−2 d−1 | −2450 mA m−2 | 86.5 |
|
| RGO paper | AC | 168.5 mMm−2 d−1 | −2580 mA m−2 | 90.7 |
|
| RGO-CF1 | AC | 2.83 mMm−2 d−1 | −4.9 A m−2 | 77 |
|
| G-NF | AC | 3.11 mMm−2 d−1 | −10.2 A m−2 | 70 |
|
| G-CuF | AC | 1697.6 mMm−2 d−1 | −21.6 A m−2 | 70.2 |
|
| RGO-TEPA-CC | AC | 1052 mMm−2 d−1 | −2358 mA m−2 | 83 |
|
| CF2/RGO | IS, AC | 35.37 mgm−2 d−1 | −29.2 A m−2 | 7.78 |
|
| MP-RGO | PHB | 91.31 mgL−1 | −11.7 μA cm−2 | 9.05 (FE) |
|
| PtNPs/RGO | AC | 126.2 gm−2 d−1 | −10 mA cm−2 | — |
|
| MnO2/RGO | IS, AC | 50.07 gm−2 d−1 | −7.8 mA | 66.4 |
|
| RGO-WO3 | AC | 5880 mgL−1 | 13.56 ± 0.5 A m−2 | 72 |
|
| Ni–PHF/CNTs | AC | 247 mMm−2 d−1 | −332 mA m−2 | 83 |
|
| NanoWeb-RVC | AC | 1.3 mMcm−2 d−1 | −3.7 mA cm−2 | 70 |
|
| Fe | AC | 204 mMm−2 d−1 | −6.6 mA m−2 | 58 |
|
| 3D Fe2O3-CC | AC | 25.4 mMm−2 d−1 | — | 86 |
|
| Chitosan/CC | AC | 229 mMm−2 d−1 | 475 mA m−2 | 86 |
|
AC-acetate, IS-isobutyrate, G-graphene, CC-carbon cloth, CF1-carbon felt, CuP-copper foam, NF-nickel foam, NPs-nanoparticles CF2-copper ferrite, FE-faradaic efficiency, PHB-polyhydroxybutyrate, MP-magnetite nanoparticles, Me-methanol, Ni–PHF-nickel hollow fibers, CNTs-carbon nanotubes, RVC-reticulated vitreous carbon, Fe2O3-Iron oxide.