Literature DB >> 27611789

Microbial Electrosynthesis and Anaerobic Fermentation: An Economic Evaluation for Acetic Acid Production from CO2 and CO.

Xenia Christodoulou1, Sharon B Velasquez-Orta1.   

Abstract

Microbial electrosynthesis (MES) and anaerobic fermentation (AF) are two biological processes capable of reducing CO2, CO, and water into acetic acid, an essential industrial reagent. In this study, we evaluated investment and production costs of acetic acid via MES and AF, and compared them to industrial chemical processes: methanol carbonylation and ethane direct oxidation. Production and investment costs were found high-priced for MES (1.44 £/kg, 1770 £/t) and AF (4.14 £/kg, 1598 £/t) because of variable and fixed costs and low production yields (100 t/y) compared to methanol carbonylation (0.26 £/kg, 261 £/t) and ethane direct oxidation (0.11 £/kg, 258 £/t). However, integrating AF with MES would reduce the release of CO2, double production rates (200 t/y), and decrease investment costs by 9% (1366 £/t). This resulted into setting the production costs at 0.24 £/kg which is currently market competitive (0.48 £/kg). This economically feasible bioprocess produced molar flow rates of 4550 mol per day from MES and AF independently. Our findings offer a bright opportunity toward the use and scale-up of MES and AF for an economically viable acetic acid production process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27611789     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

Review 1.  A comparative analysis of biopolymer production by microbial and bioelectrochemical technologies.

Authors:  Brenda Alvarez Chavez; Vijaya Raghavan; Boris Tartakovsky
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.036

2.  Bioelectrochemical systems and synthetic biology: more power, more products.

Authors:  Sarah M Glaven
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.813

3.  Microbial electrosynthesis: is it sustainable for bioproduction of acetic acid?

Authors:  Siddharth Gadkari; Behzad Haji Mirza Beigi; Nabin Aryal; Jhuma Sadhukhan
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.361

4.  Sustainable hydrogen-rich syngas from steam reforming of bio-based acetic acid over ZnO and CeO2-ZnO supported Ni-based catalysts.

Authors:  Shan Luo; Fazhe Sun; Peng Fu; Qi Sun; Jianlin Wang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 5.  A short review of graphene in the microbial electrosynthesis of biochemicals from carbon dioxide.

Authors:  L F Chen; H Yu; J Zhang; H Y Qin
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 4.036

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.