Injury Prevention Effect of MRI Imaging Technology in Physical Education and Sports Training.

In order to solve the problem of observing and analyzing the clinical value of MRI diagnosis in patients with knee sports injury and guiding clinical targeted treatment, the author proposed a sports injury prevention method in sports training teaching based on MRI image observation. This method retrospectively analyzed the imaging data of 101 patients with knee joint MRI examination due to osteoarthritis, sports injury and synovitis in joint surgery, and arthroscopic exclusion of true meniscus tear, MR multisequence and multiplane scans were performed to observe the anatomical features of TGL and MFL images and the occurrence rate of the lateral meniscus "false tear sign," and the χ 2 test was used to compare the occurrence rate of "pseudo-tear sign" between genders and sides. Experimental results show that the incidence of TGL on MRI was about 67.3% (68/101), and the incidence of "pseudo-tear sign" in the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus caused by TGL was 2.9% (2/68). The overall appearance rate of MFL on MRI was 91.1% (92/101), the appearance rate of plate anterior ligament (HL) was 13.9% (14/101), and the occurrence rate of "pseudo-tear sign" in the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus caused by HL was 7.1% (1/14). The occurrence rate of the posterior ligament (WL) was 77.2% (78/101), and the incidence of "pseudo-tear sign" in the posterior horn was 20.5% (16/78). According to the shape and course of TGL and MFL on MRI, and the direction and position of the lateral meniscus pseudotear, combined with MRI sagittal plane and coronal plane observation, it can effectively identify the true and false attributes of lateral meniscus anterior and posterior horn tears, thereby reducing unnecessary surgical treatment.

1. Introduction

In daily physical education training, it can not only improve the physical quality of students but also master training techniques to provide help for the healthy development of students' bodies; in special sports, many students enjoy the fun of sports and will also injured during exercise. With the continuous innovation and reform of physical education, higher requirements are put forward for students' physical quality. Therefore, through the analysis of the situation and causes of sports injuries, students are reminded to pay attention to the possibility of preventing injuries, in order to ensure their own safety [1]. In daily sports training, the main reason for students' injury in sports training lies in their physical fitness. Students lack of systematic exercise, resulting in excessive muscle tension and excitement during training, resulting in poor physical coordination; therefore, the muscle strength of the students is insufficient, resulting in some impairment of sports training activities. In addition, the students are unable to respond quickly to the movement due to technical factors, resulting in poor flexibility of the limbs and substandard movements, which can easily cause the body to lose balance and eventually cause injury. Students will also suffer from unresolved fatigue of the body, which will affect their subsequent training, or train and compete with injuries, resulting in more injuries. In sports training, students lack coordination and cooperation with each other, resulting in the phenomenon of limb collision leading to injury [2]. Figure 1 shows the sports injury prevention method. The knee joint is a vital weight-bearing joint in the human body with a complex structure. Once it is overexercised, it may cause knee joint injury, which will not only cause local pain and discomfort in the patient's knee joint but also damage the surrounding tissues. Although CT and X-ray have certain value for the diagnosis of knee joint injury, their spatial resolution is poor, and it is difficult to accurately judge the degree of knee joint injury. Arthroscopy, the “gold standard” for diagnosis, although it can help clinically identify the actual damage of the knee joint, in-depth analysis of the anatomical structure can guide effective clinical diagnosis and treatment, but it is more invasive, and is likely to cause greater trauma to the physical and mental health of patients, limiting its clinical application [3]. MRI is noninvasive. This not only enables multiplanar imaging but also has high soft tissue resolution, which can clearly observe the cruciate ligament meniscus, synovial membrane, articular cartilage and joint capsule, and other tissues. So, the process of clinical diagnosis of patients with knee sports injury has been widely used.

Figure 1

Sports injury prevention.

2. Literature Review

There is a risk of injury in sports training, most of which are due to the insufficient preparation of the trainee, the incompatibility of the trainee's physical reserve and the training intensity, the irregular training venue, and the imperfect training facilities or disrepair. Among them, the personal physical quality and skill level of trainees vary from person to person; so, the probability of sports injury risk for different training objects is also different. In the process of training, some common training mistakes can easily lead to sports injuries [4]. For example, the preparatory activities before training are insufficient and unreasonable, and the coaches ignore the necessity of proper relaxation during the training process and arranged a lot of load sports that do not match the physical fitness level of the trainees, some athletes insisted on training with injuries in order to improve their competition performance and competitive skills, and the coaches did not organize training programs, especially confrontational training programs. Athletes' physical factors limit their athletic ability to a certain extent; if athletes and coaches do not realize this, and arrange training programs that are not in line with their own physiological level, it is very easy to cause sports injuries [5]. Physiological factors mainly include muscle strength, flexibility, sensitivity, coordination, injury history, and degree of fatigue [6]. Among them, the main reasons for sports injuries are insufficient muscle strength, insufficient flexibility, and excessive fatigue of the body. The knee joint is the largest and most complex joint in the human body, due to sports injuries, high-energy injuries, and degenerative changes, and the meniscus is prone to damage. MRI can perform multidirectional, arbitrary cross-section, and multiparameter imaging and has high resolution of soft tissue density. It is currently the best method for noninvasive diagnosis of meniscus injury [7]. In the clinical practice of joint surgery, preoperative knee MRI is sometimes misjudged as “pseudo-tear sign.” “Pseudo-tear sign” is often manifested in the lateral meniscus. The formation of the “pseudo-tear sign” in the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus is often related to the course of the transverse knee ligament (TGL), and the cause of the “pseudo-tear sign” in the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus is often related to the course of the menisco-femoral ligament (MFL). MFL can be divided into anterior ligament (Humphrey's ligament, HL) and posterior ligament (Wrisberg's ligament, WL) according to the location of the insertion point [8]. Although TGL, HL, and WL have gradually attracted attention, there is still a lack of quantitative research on these three ligament systems. The author retrospectively analyzed the MRI data of 101 knee joint subjects, counted the occurrence rate of TGL, HL and WL, and observed the cross-sectional morphology of TGL, HL and WL, the midpoint sagittal diameter and coronal diameter were measured, and the fascicles of the three ligaments and the occurrence rate of the lateral meniscus “pseudo-tear sign” were calculated to improve the understanding of TGL, HL, and WL, establish an effective identification method for true and false tears in the anterior and posterior horns of the lateral meniscus caused by TGL, HL, and WL, and avoid unnecessary surgery such as arthroscopy [9].

3. Methods

3.1. Information

The data of 101 adult patients who underwent MRI examination due to knee joint degeneration, traffic accident injury, sports injury, etc. were selected for retrospective analysis; among them, there were 60 males and 41 females, with an average age of 42 (18-75) years old, 43 left knees, and 58 right knees. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age ≥ 18 years old; MRI data were complete; arthroscopic examinations were completed, and meniscus tears were excluded [10]. Exclusion criteria were as follows: severe knee trauma, severe degeneration, and significant motion artefacts indicated by arthroscopy and/or MRI.

3.2. Inspection Method

3.2.1. MR Scanning Method and Sequence Parameters

The German-made Siemens Verio 3.0T superconducting MR machine and the wrapped surface coil are used for scanning. The patient was placed in the supine position with the knee extended, the center of the coil was positioned at the level of the lower border of the patella, and the knee was fixed with a plastic fixator. Sagittal, coronal, and axial scans of the knee joint were routinely performed. Scanning sequence and parameters were as follows: conventional scanning sagittal, coronal, and axial [11]. Sagittal PDW-TSE-SPIR were as follows: TR1500 ms, TE15 ms, slice thickness 4 mm, slice spacing 0.4 mm, matrix 216 × 512, and FOV150 mm. Sagittal TSE-T1WI were as follows: TR400 ms, TE9 ms, slice thickness 3 mm, slice spacing 0.4 mm, matrix 384 × 256, and FOV 150 mm. Coronal FS-PDWI were as follows: TR3600 ms, TE29 ms, layer thickness 3 mm, layer spacing 1 mm, matrix 448 × 320, and FOV150 mm. Coronal TSE-T2WI were as follows: TR4000 ms, TE61.6 ms, layer thickness 3 mm, layer spacing 1 mm, matrix 352 × 288, and FOV150 mm. Cross-sectional FS-T2WI were as follows: TR4000 ms, TE80 ms, layer thickness 1 mm, layer spacing 1 mm, matrix 352 × 288, and FOV150 mm [12].

3.2.2. Observation Method

One each of the chief physicians of the Department of Radiology and the Department of Joint Surgery and the occurrence rate of TGL, HL and WL were observed on MRI multisequence and multiplanar images by single-blind method, the running mode, cross-sectional shape, midpoint diameter, and beam splitting, whether there is a “pseudo-tear sign” in the anterior and posterior angles of the lateral meniscus, etc. [13]. If the result is a quantitative index, it will be measured twice and averaged for statistical analysis. If the qualitative index of observation is inconsistent, it will be determined after discussion.

3.2.3. Definition of Midpoint Diameter and Determination of Anatomical Landmarks

The midpoint diameter defined by the author is divided into midpoint sagittal diameter and midpoint coronal diameter. The midpoint sagittal diameter refers to the anteroposterior diameter (width) of the ligament observed in the sagittal plane; in order to unify the observation plane, a standardized plane that is clearly displayed on the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments is selected for measurement. The midpoint coronal diameter refers to the upper and lower diameter (thickness) of the ligament observed in the coronal plane; in order to unify the observation plane, a standardized plane above the intercondylar spine that clearly shows the observed ligament is selected for measurement [14].

3.3. Data Statistical Processing

SPSS 16.0 statistical software was used for data processing. Measurement data obeyed or approximately obeyed normal distribution, expressed as (), count data were analyzed by χ2 test, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The χ2 test is a widely used hypothesis test method, but it is often used in the hypothesis test of categorical count data in medical papers; that is, for the comparison of the rate of two specimens, the rate of multiple specimens, the internal structure of the specimen, and the rate of specimens, compared with the overall rate, the actual distribution of a phenomenon is compared with its theoretical distribution [15]. However, when the samples meet the normal approximation conditions, such as the number of samples n and the sample rate p meet the conditions np and n (1 − p) that are greater than 5, the hypothesis test statistic u value can be calculated to make judgments. Commonly used χ2 test is divided into the following categories: ① 2 × 2 table χ2 test: applicable to the comparison of 2 specimen rates or composition ratios and ② paired data χ2 test: it is suitable for the comparison of the ratios or composition ratios of two samples in a paired design, that is, whether there is a significant difference between the two treatment results through the data of a single sample; ③ R × C table χ2 test is suitable for the comparison of the ratios or composition ratios of multiple samples [16].

3.4. Identification Method

(1) Observe the lateral meniscus image in successive slices on the sagittal plane image. Pseudotears of the meniscus are discontinuous and mostly confined to the vicinity of the anterior and posterior horns of the meniscus, while TGL and MLF can be displayed continuously on other sagittal planes. (2) Observe the running direction and appearance position of the linear high signal [17]. The running direction of true meniscus tear is complex, and its location is not constant, while the running direction of pseudotear caused by TGL band is from the back to the front, and it is fixed at the anterior horn of the meniscus. The linear running direction of the pseudotear caused by MLF is one of the following two directions: one is from the posterior superior border of the lateral meniscus to the posterior and inferior, and the other is fixed in the vertical direction of the medial part of the posterior corner of the lateral meniscus. (3) Observation of meniscus morphology is as follows: in a true tear, the meniscus is irregularly shaped and appears to be completely hyperintense. However, in the pseudotear of the anterior and posterior horns of the lateral meniscus caused by TGL and MLF, there is no abnormality in the lateral meniscus itself, and the edges of the lateral meniscus are smooth and maintain a regular “bow tie” shape. (4) The role of coronal position in the identification of true and false tears: coronal images often show the full picture of TGL and MLF; in the true meniscus tear, high signal can be observed in both the sagittal and coronal views, while the pseudotear coronal view has wireless-like high signal between the TGL and MLF and the lateral meniscus [18]. The purpose of this study was to systematically observe the lateral meniscus “pseudo-tear sign” and related TGL and MLF by MRI and deepen the understanding of TGL and MLF imaging anatomy, the mechanism of the false tear sign of the lateral meniscus of the knee joint in MRI was discussed, and an effective method for identifying the true and false tear of the lateral meniscus was established.

4. Results and Analysis

Among the 101 knees in this group, TGL was observed on MRI in 68 cases, the incidence rate of TGL was 67.3%, the incidence of TGL in the left knee was 67.4%, and that in the right knee was 67.2%. HL was observed on MRI in 14 cases, and the incidence of HL was 13.9%; among them, the incidence of HL in the left knee was 11.6%, and the incidence of HL in the right knee was 15.5%. WL was observed in 78 cases on MRI, and the incidence of WL was 77.2%; among them, the incidence of WL in the left knee was 74.4%, and the incidence of WL in the right knee was 79.3% [19]. Three target ligaments appeared at the same time in 2 cases, accounting for 2.0%, and in 5 cases, none of the three ligaments appeared, accounting for 5.0%. There was no significant difference in the occurrence rates of TGL, HL, and WL between the left and right sides (all P values >0.05), see Table 1.

Table 1

Occurrence rate of transverse knee ligament and anterior and posterior ligaments of femoral plate in 101 patients.

Side exception	Transverse knee ligament	Anterior plate femoral ligament	Plate posterior ligament
Left knee 43	29 (67.4%)	5 (11.6%)	32 (74.4%)
Right knee 58	39 (67.2%)	9 (15.5%)	46 (79.3%)
Total 101	68 (67.3%)	14 (13.9%)	78 (77.2%)
x 2 value	0.000	0.313	0.336
P value	0.983	0.576	0.562

In sagittal MRI, the TGL is located anterior to the tibiofemoral joint and posterior to the infrapatellar fat pad, and the mean midpoint diameter of the TGL is as follows: sagittal diameter (1.88 ± 0.35) mm and coronal diameter (1.79 ± 0.60) mm. The walking patterns can be divided into two types: the first one is the common one, which is loosely related to the tibial plateau; that is, it passes through the middle of the infrapatellar fat pad, and there are 57 cases of this type, accounting for 83.8% (57/68); the other one is less common, which is closely related to the tibial plateau, that is, crawls on the articular surface of the tibial plateau, and there are 11 cases of this type, accounting for 16.2% (11/68). In the sagittal view, the cross-sectional morphology of TGL was oval in 45.6% (31/68), round in 33.8% (23/68), irregular in 14.7% (10/68), and flat in 2.9% (2/68), the short bar accounts for 2.9% (2/68) and 91.2% (62/68) of TGLs were single beam, 5.9% (4/68) were two beams, and 2.9% (2/68) were three beams or more, and the midpoint diameter of the three ligaments measured by MRI is shown in Table 2 [20].

Table 2

The transverse ligament of the knee and the midpoint diameter of the anterior and posterior ligaments of the plate and femur.

Ligament name
	Transverse knee ligament		Anterior plate femoral ligament		Plate posterior ligament
Midpoint diameter (mm)	Sagittal diameter	Coronal diameter	Sagittal diameter	Coronal diameter	Sagittal diameter	Coronal diameter
	1.88 ± 0.35	1.79 ± 0.60	1.53 ± 0.39	2.82 ± 0.92	2.04 ± 1.03	3.1 ± 1.08

The HL originates from the medial border of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus, runs obliquely inward and upward through the posterior cruciate ligament, and ends in front of the posterior cruciate ligament on the lateral side of the medial condyle of the femur. The mean midpoint diameter of HL was as follows: sagittal diameter (1.53 ± 0.39) mm and coronal diameter (2.8 ± 0.92) mm. There are two ways of HL running: the first type was closely related to the posterior cruciate ligament, accounting for 85.7% (12/14) in 12 cases. The other type was loosely related to the posterior cruciate ligament, accounting for 14.3% (2/14) in 2 cases. The cross-sectional morphology of HL was observed in the sagittal view: 42.9% (6/14) were oval, 35.7% (5/14) were flat, and 7.1% were round, short rod, and irregular (1/14)/14). HL splitting was as follows: 9 cases of single bundle, accounting for 64.3%, 3 cases of two bundles, accounting for 21.4%, and 2 cases of three bundles or more, accounting for 2.9%, and the running mode is shown in Table 3.

Table 3

The course of the transverse knee ligament and the anterior and posterior ligaments of the plate and femur.

Way of walking	Ligament name
	Transverse knee ligament	Anterior plate femoral ligament	Plate posterior ligament
Loose	57 (83.82%)	2 (14.29%)	28 (35.90%)
Compact	11 (16.18%)	12 (85.71%)	50 (64.10%)

The WL originates from the medial edge of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus, is located posterior to the HL, and continues upward obliquely through the posterior cruciate ligament, ending at the rear of the posterior cruciate ligament on the lateral side of the medial femoral condyle. The mean midpoint diameter of WL was as follows: sagittal diameter (2.04 ± 1.03) mm and coronal diameter (3.10 ± 1.08) mm. WL can also be divided into two types: one is closely related to the posterior cruciate ligament, 50 cases of this type, accounting for 64.1% (50/78); among them, 11 cases were directly merged into the posterior cruciate ligament, accounting for 14.1% (11/78). A loose type is related to the posterior cruciate ligament, 28 cases of this type, accounting for 35.9% (28/78). The WL cross-sectional morphology observed in the sagittal view was as follows: the flat shape accounted for 35.9% (25/78), the irregular shape accounted for 34.6% (27/78), the oval shape accounted for 15.4% (12/78), and the short rod shape had 11.5% (9/78) and 2.6% (2/78) round. WL beam splitting was as follows: 66 cases of single beam, accounting for 84.6%, 11 cases of two beams, accounting for 14.1%, 1 case of three beams or more, accounting for 1.3%, the cross-sectional shape is shown in Table 4, the beam splitting is shown in Table 5, and the scatter distribution of the midpoint diameter is shown in Figures 2(a)–2(c).

Table 4

Cross-sectional morphology of transverse knee ligament and anterior and posterior plate femoral ligaments.

Example	Round	Oval	Flat	Short stick	Irregular shape
Knee transverse ligament (68)	23 (33.8%)	31 (45.6%)	2 (2.9%)	2 (2.9%)	10 (14.7%)
Anterior plate femoral ligament (14)	1 (7.1%)	6 (42.8%)	5 (35.7%)	1 (7.1%)	1 (7.1%)
Posterior plate femoral ligament (78)	2 (2.6%)	12 (15.4%)	28 (35.9%)	9 (11.5%)	27 (34.6%)

Table 5

The transverse ligament of the knee and the anterior and posterior ligaments of the plate and femoral ligament.

Example	1 bunch	2 bunches	≥3 beams
Knee transverse ligament (68)	62 (91.2%)	4 (5.9%)	2 (2.9%)
Anterior plate femoral ligament (14)	9 (64.3%)	3 (21.4%)	2 (14.3%)
Posterior plate femoral ligament (78)	66 (84.6%)	11 (14.1%)	1 (1.3%)

Figure 2

Scatter distribution of the midpoint diameter of the transverse knee ligament and the anterior and posterior ligaments of the plate and femur. (a) Sagittal diameter at the midpoint of the transverse ligament of the knee. (b) Sagittal diameter at the midpoint of the anterior femoral ligament. (c) Sagittal diameter at the midpoint of the posterior femoral ligament.

In Figure 2, (a) is the scatter diagram of the midpoint sagittal diameter of the transverse ligament of the knee, (b) is the distribution of the midpoint sagittal diameter of the anterior plate femoral ligament, and (c) is the distribution map of the sagittal diameter at the midpoint of the posterior ligament of the plate.

5. Conclusion

The author proposes the prevention of sports injury in sports training teaching based on MRI image observation, through systematic and quantitative MRI image anatomical observation of TGL, HL, and WL, and the understanding of the rare ligaments of the knee joint has been deepened. The common causes of the formation of the “false tear sign” of the lateral meniscus of the knee joint were identified, and an effective method to identify the true and false tear of the lateral meniscus was established: comprehensive sagittal and coronal images and careful observation of the shape, position, and running direction of TGL, HL, and WL can effectively identify the true and false tear of the lateral meniscus; in order to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgical treatment, it has certain significance for accurate preoperative diagnosis of lateral meniscus injury of knee joint.