Po-Hsien Wu1, Nien-Ying Tsai Md2, Cheng-Wen Hsiao Md1, Shu-Wen Jao Md1, Yi-Chiao Cheng Md1. 1. Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan. 2. Department of General Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reported learning curves of colonoscopy vary from 94 to 275 cases and focus on one-person colonoscopy. Our aim was to evaluate the learning curve of two-person non-sedation colonoscopy for trainees in a single tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in 1264 patients who underwent diagnostic or screening colonoscopies in a single institution from August 2012 to January 2013. Most of the patients (1174/1264) did not receive sedation during the procedure. All procedures were performed under two-person control. Two third-year residents who received previous colonoscopic training via a plastic model were the trainees. RESULTS: In comparison to the performance of 5 staff members, the colonoscopic outcomes showed no significant differences in the completion rates (77.2% vs. 79.8%, P = .382), average polyp numbers (.9 ± 1.7 vs. 1.0 ± 1.8, P = .453), polyp detection rates (43.5% vs. 46.3%, P = .434), or intubation lengths (96.4 ± 29.3 vs. 96.3 ± 26.7 cm, P = .939). The total procedure times for the 2 groups were 17.2 ± 10.6 minutes (trainees) and 12.9 ± 7.8 minutes (staff) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Trainees achieved acceptable outcomes over an 81-97 case learning curve under a two-person non-sedation colonoscopy technique, an approach with potential as a transition to single-operator colonoscopy.
BACKGROUND: Reported learning curves of colonoscopy vary from 94 to 275 cases and focus on one-person colonoscopy. Our aim was to evaluate the learning curve of two-person non-sedation colonoscopy for trainees in a single tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in 1264 patients who underwent diagnostic or screening colonoscopies in a single institution from August 2012 to January 2013. Most of the patients (1174/1264) did not receive sedation during the procedure. All procedures were performed under two-person control. Two third-year residents who received previous colonoscopic training via a plastic model were the trainees. RESULTS: In comparison to the performance of 5 staff members, the colonoscopic outcomes showed no significant differences in the completion rates (77.2% vs. 79.8%, P = .382), average polyp numbers (.9 ± 1.7 vs. 1.0 ± 1.8, P = .453), polyp detection rates (43.5% vs. 46.3%, P = .434), or intubation lengths (96.4 ± 29.3 vs. 96.3 ± 26.7 cm, P = .939). The total procedure times for the 2 groups were 17.2 ± 10.6 minutes (trainees) and 12.9 ± 7.8 minutes (staff) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Trainees achieved acceptable outcomes over an 81-97 case learning curve under a two-person non-sedation colonoscopy technique, an approach with potential as a transition to single-operator colonoscopy.
Entities:
Keywords:
awake colonoscopy; learning curve; non-sedation colonoscopy; training