| Literature DB >> 36105205 |
Arina V Bervinova1,2, Viktor A Palikov1, Evgeny S Mikhailov1,2, Yulia A Palikova1, Natalya A Borozdina1,2, Vitaly A Kazakov1, Pavel A Rudenko1, Elena A Tukhovskaya1, Igor A Dyachenko1, Gulsara A Slashcheva1, Natalya A Goryacheva1,2, Elena S Sadovnikova1, Irina N Kravchenko1, Elena A Kalabina1, Maksim V Shinelev1,2, Peng Wu3, Arkady N Murashev1.
Abstract
The development of new herbal preparations for the treatment of urolithiasis is an urgent task of medical science. Ficus have attracted the attention of pharmacologists due to a wide range of biological properties, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and antifungal activity. We studied the effectiveness of Ficus tikoua Bur. in SD rats in which urolithiasis was induced by 6 weeks of oral administration of ethylene glycol 0.5% ad libitum instead of drinking water. Administration of the extract of Ficus tikoua Bur., as well as comparative drug Cystone® after modeling of urolithiasis lead to the restoration of diuresis and the concentration of inorganic phosphates starting from the 6th week of the experiment. The use of the Ficus tikoua Bur. extract for 6 weeks, both during the modeling of urolithiasis and during the recovery period, led to the restoration of the percentage of lymphocytes in the blood, content of sodium, chlorine and inorganic phosphates in the blood to the control level. Thus, the extract of Ficus tikoua Bur. seems to be a promising drug for effective treatment of the initial stages of the development of urolithiasis.Entities:
Keywords: Cystone®; Ficus tikoua Bur.; SD rats; ethylene glycol; urolithiasis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36105205 PMCID: PMC9464938 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.974947
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
Groups and doses.
| Group | Urolithiasis simulation | Drug | Dose | Route and scheme of administration | Number of animals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vehicle (water) for 6 weeks | — | — | — | 24 |
| 2 | EG 0.5%as a drink in a drinking bottle for 6 weeks instead of water | — | — | — | 24 |
| 3 | EG 0.5% as a drink in a drinking bottle for 6 weeks instead of water |
| 250 mg/kg | Gavage 5 ml/kg simultaneously with EG 0.5% for 6 weeks from the first day of study | 12 |
| 4 | EG 0.5% as a drink in a drinking bottle for 6 weeks instead of water |
| 250 mg/kg | Gavage 5 ml/kg beginning from 7th week of study (after the withdrawal of EG0.5%) | 12 |
| 5 | EG 0.5% as a drink in a drinking bottle for 6 weeks instead of water | Cystone® | 150 mg/kg | Gavage 5 ml/kg beginning from 7th week of study (after the withdrawal of EG0.5%) | 12 |
FIGURE 1Micrographs of inorganic urine sediment. (A) - Control group, 3rd week of the experiment, (B) - Group EG 0.5%, 3rd week of the experiment, (C) - Group EG 0.5%, 6th week of the experiment, (D) - Group EG 0.5%, 9th week of the experiment, € - Group EG 0.5%, 12th week of the experiment, microscope magnification ×100, (F) - oxalic and phosphatic crystals, microscope magnification ×400.
The number of crystals in the inorganic urine sediment.
| Group | Control ( | EG 0.5% ( | EG 0.5% + Ficus 1 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3rd week | ||||
| oxalates | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 44.4 ± 27.3** | 18.1 ± 7.6* | |
| phosphates | 41.5 ± 21.7 | 56.6 ± 21.0 | 43.1 ± 11.5 | |
| 6rd week | ||||
| oxalates | 0 ± 0 | 41.2 ± 25.7* | 15.8 ± 5.9**# | |
| Phosphates | 39.3 ± 14.2 | 33.6 ± 10.2 | 45.7 ± 12.4** | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9th week | ||||
| oxalates | 0 ± 0 | 1.1 ± 1.1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 |
| phosphates | 35.4 ± 13.7 | 29.7 ± 17.0 | 29.3 ± 11.2 | 36.8 ± 12.9 |
| 12th week | ||||
| oxalates | 0 ± 0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0 ± 0 | 0.3 ± 0.3 |
| phosphates | 32.4 ± 20.6 | 36.1 ± 21.4 | 20.3 ± 8.9 | 32.7 ± 7.3 |
Data are presented as MEAN ± SEM.* - p < 0.05 comparing to control group according to Kruskal-Wallis test + Mann-Whitney U-test.
Diuresis results.
| Control ( | EG 0.5% ( | EG 0.5% + Ficus 1 ( | — | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3rd week | 67.8 ± 6 | 27.1 ± 2.8* | 74.8 ± 24.8# | — |
| 6th week | 54.1 ± 8.2 | 27 ± 2.7* | 30.2 ± 2.7* | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9th week | 69.3 ± 7.9 | 29.4 ± 4.2* | 110.5 ± 13.6*## | 106.2 ± 26.3## |
| 12th week | 55 ± 10 | 42.1 ± 5.2 | 118.5 ± 11.4*# | 127.9 ± 13.1**## |
Data are presented as MEAN ± SEM; * - p < 0.05 comparing to control group according to Kruskal-Wallis test + Mann-Whitney U-test; # - p < 0.05 comparing to model (0.5% EG) according to Kruskal-Wallis test + Mann-Whitney U-test.
General urinalysis results.
| Control ( | EG 0.5% ( | EG 0.5% + Ficus 2 ( | EG 0.5% + Cystone®( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12th week | ||||
| Urobilinogen, mg/dl | 7.3 ± 1.9 | 8.7 ± 1.6 | 6.7 ± 0.8# | 12.7 ± 2.2*#& |
| pH | 7.7 ± 0.3 | 7.7 ± 0.3 | 8.7 ± 0.3* | 8.8 ± 0.1* |
Data are presented as MEAN ± SEM.* - p < 0,05 comparing to control group according to Kruskal-Wallis test + Mann-Whitney U-test; # - p < 0,05 comparing to model (0.5% EG) according to Kruskal-Wallis test + Mann-Whitney U-test; &- p < 0,05 comparing to EG, 0.5%+Ficus 2group according to Kruskal-Wallis test + Mann-Whitney U-test.
Hematology parameters.
| Control ( | EG 0.5% ( | EG 0.5% + Ficus 1 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3rd week | |||
| Lymphocytes, % | 83.6 ± 0.9 | 83.7 ± 1.4 | 73.6 ± 4.3*# |
| Granulocytes, % | 11 ± 1 | 12 ± 1 | 19 ± 5* |
| Red blood cells count (RBC), 10^12/L | 6.9 ± 0.18 | 8.14 ± 0.12** | 7.89 ± 0.15* |
| Haemoglobin (Hb), g/l | 136 ± 2 | 151 ± 1** | 142 ± 2# |
| Haematocrit (HCT), l/l | 0.421 ± 0.006 | 0.472 ± 0.004* | 0.446 ± 0.009# |
| Mean cell volume, fl | 61.1 ± 0.7 | 58 ± 0.5* | 56.2 ± 1.1* |
| Mean cell hemoglobin, pg | 19.8 ± 0.3 | 18.6 ± 0.1 | 17.8 ± 0.3*# |
| RBC distribution width, % | 12.5 ± 0.2 | 11.5 ± 0.2* | 11.8 ± 0.2* |
| RDW standart deviation, fl | 37.4 ± 0.6 | 8.14 ± 0.12** | 8.14 ± 0.12** |
| Platelet count (PLT), 10^9/L | 761 ± 17 | 695 ± 23 | 671 ± 34* |
| Mean platelet volume, fl | 5.4 ± 0.1 | 5.4 ± 0.1 | 5.3 ± 0.1 |
| Platelet distribution width, % | 11.1 ± 0.3 | 13.8 ± 0.3* | 14.2 ± 0.6* |
| 6th week | |||
| Lymphocytes, % | 82 ± 1.3 | 78.7 ± 2 | 82.7 ± 1.3 |
| Granulocytes, % | 12 ± 1 | 16 ± 2 | 13 ± 1 |
| Red blood cells count (RBC), 10^12/L | 7.09 ± 0.1 | 7.74 ± 0.47 | 8.27 ± 0.19* |
| Haemoglobin (Hb), g/l | 138 ± 1 | 140 ± 2 | 149 ± 3* |
| Haematocrit (HCT), l/l | 0.431 ± 0.006 | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 0.472 ± 0.012* |
| Mean cell volume, fl | 60.7 ± 0.9 | 57.6 ± 2.2 | 57.1 ± 0.8 |
| Mean cell hemoglobin, pg | 19.4 ± 0.2 | 18.4 ± 0.8 | 18 ± 0.3* |
| RBC distribution width, % | 12.4 ± 0.3 | 12.5 ± 0.3 | 11.6 ± 0.2 |
| RDW standart deviation, fl | 36.5 ± 0.7 | 24.4 ± 7.7 | 26.5 ± 5.4 |
| Platelet count (PLT), 10^9/L | 741 ± 12 | 732 ± 12 | 690 ± 25 |
| Mean platelet volume, fl | 5.1 ± 0 | 5.3 ± 0.1 | 5.3 ± 0* |
| Platelet distribution width, % | 10.9 ± 0.2 | 12.6 ± 1.3 | 14 ± 0.4* |
Data are presented as MEAN ± SEM; * - p < 0.05 comparing to control group according to Kruskal-Wallis test + Mann-Whitney U-test; # - p < 0.05 comparing to model (0.5% EG) according to Kruskal-Wallis test + Mann-Whitney U-test.
Data are presented as MEAN ± SEM; * - p < 0.05 comparing to control group according to Kruskal-Wallis test + Mann-Whitney U-test; # - p < 0.05 comparing to model (0.5% EG) according to Kruskal-Wallis test + Mann-Whitney U-test.
Serum chemistry parameters.
| Control ( | EG 0.5% ( | EG 0.5% + Ficus 1 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3rd week | |||
| Urea, mmol/L | 8.9 ± 0.3 | 8.5 ± 0.2 | 8 ± 0.6 |
| Total Cholesterol, mmol/L | 2.51 ± 0.17 | 2.56 ± 0.14 | 2.35 ± 0.15 |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 0.74 ± 0.14 | 0.96 ± 0.05 | 1.04 ± 0.19 |
| Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), U/L | 65 ± 7 | 78 ± 3 | 66 ± 8 |
| Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), U/L | 88 ± 6 | 81 ± 2 | 89 ± 5 |
| Alkaline phosphatase (ALΡ), U/L | 183 ± 21 | 220 ± 10 | 180 ± 18 |
| Inorganic phosphates, mmol/L | 2.24 ± 0.04 | 2.23 ± 0.05 | 2.35 ± 0.19 |
| Na+ | 140.2 ± 1.1 | 138.5 ± 0.2 | 138.3 ± 0.8 |
| Clˉ | 98.6 ± 1.0 | 96.2 ± 0.3* | 96.1 ± 0.6* |
| Globulin, g/L | 23.6 ± 1.0 | 22.6 ± 0.6 | 22 ± 0.4 |
| 6th week | |||
| Urea, mmol/L | 8.1 ± 0.1 | 8.2 ± 0.1 | 8.3 ± 0.2 |
| Total Cholesterol, mmol/L | 2.67 ± 0.14 | 2.5 ± 0.11 | 2.63 ± 0.11 |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 0.82 ± 0.07 | 0.49 ± 0.04* | 0.45 ± 0.04** |
| Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), U/L | 80 ± 6 | 82 ± 4 | 84 ± 4 |
| Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), U/L | 113 ± 8 | 102 ± 7 | 111 ± 7 |
| Alkaline phosphatase (ALΡ), U/L | 164 ± 21 | 160 ± 11 | 160 ± 26 |
| Inorganic phosphates, mmol/L | 2.52 ± 0.11 | 2.51 ± 0.17 | 2.41 ± 0.13 |
| Na+ | 142.4 ± 0.7 | 140.4 ± 0.6 | 141.6 ± 0.2 |
| Clˉ | 99.5 ± 0.7 | 98.4 ± 0.5 | 99.9 ± 0.5 |
| Globulin, g/L | 23 ± 0.6 | 22.4 ± 0.7 | 22.8 ± 0.5 |
Data are presented as MEAN ± SEM; * - p < 0.05 comparing to control group according to Kruskal-Wallis test + Mann-Whitney U-test; # - p < 0.05 comparing to model (0.5% EG) according to Kruskal-Wallis test + Mann-Whitney U-test.
Data are presented as MEAN ± SEM; * - p < 0.05 comparing to control group according to Kruskal-Wallis test + Mann-Whitney U-test; # - p < 0.05 comparing to model (0.5% EG) according to Kruskal-Wallis test + Mann-Whitney U-test.
FIGURE 2Micrographs of the kidneys. (A) - concrements in the lumen of the dilated renal tubule (marked with arrows), stained with hematoxylin and eosin, microscope magnification ×100; (B) - Randall plaque with multiple concrements in the region of the renal papillae of the pelvicalyceal system; stained with hematoxylin and eosin, microscope magnification ×100; (C) - Numerous segmented neutrophils in the lumen of the renal tubules, abundant peritubular neutrophil infiltration, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, microscope magnification ×200.
FIGURE 3Fragments of the kidneys of intact animal (A), animal with the model of urolithiasis by the end of the 12th week after a 6-weeks stay on aEG 0.5% solution instead of standard drinking water. Animals received from the 7th week water (B), Ficus tikoua Bur. extract (C) and Cystone® (D). Phenomena of chronic progressive nephropathy with the presence of hyaline masses (pink) in the lumen of the dilated renal tubules; Randall’s plaques (black arrows); stones in the lumen of dilated renal tubules (white arrows). Stained with hematoxylin and eosin. microscope magnification ×100.