| Literature DB >> 36105002 |
Sarunas Badaras1, Modestas Ruzauskas2,3, Romas Gruzauskas4, Egle Zokaityte1,5, Vytaute Starkute1,5, Dovile Klupsaite1, Ernestas Mockus1, Jolita Klementaviciute1, Laurynas Vadopalas1, Gintare Zokaityte1, Agila Dauksiene1,3, Vadims Bartkevics6, Elena Bartkiene1,5.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the influence of different compositions of creep compound feed (CCF) (C-I - control group; TG-II - a CCF containing wheat bran extruded and fermented with L. paracasei; TG-III - a creep compound feed containing sugar beet pulp) on the piglets' growth performance, blood parameters, fecal microbial profile and physicochemical characteristics. Moreover, the fecal volatile compound (VC) profile was analyzed as a possible chemical marker related to changes in the fecal microbial profile and physicochemical characteristics. A 21-day experiment was conducted using 1-day-old 300 Large White/Norwegian Landrace piglets. The highest body weight (at the 21st day) was found in piglets of the TG-III group, and both treated groups showed lower feed conversion ratios. At the end of the experiment, significantly higher lactobacillus counts in the feces of both treated groups were found, and a correlation between fecal textural hardness and the lactobacillus count was established (r = 0.475). Significant correlations of piglets' individual fecal VC with microbiological parameters and fecal pH were established [lactobacilli with 3-n-nonadecanol-1; enterobacteria with butyric acid <2-methyl->; pentanoic acid, 4-methyl-; eicosene(E)-, etc.]. It can be concluded that local material could be successfully incorporated into CCF preparation without impairing animal metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: creep compound feed; growth performance; health; microbial profile; piglets; sugar beet pulp; wheat bran
Year: 2022 PMID: 36105002 PMCID: PMC9465008 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.971783
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Composition of control and experimental piglet diets.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Barley | 8.00 | 10.0 | 8.0 |
| Wheat | 31.0 | 24.2 | 28.0 |
| Extruded Wheat | 18.0 | 20.0 | 18.0 |
| Extruded + fermented wheat bran | – | 3.0 | – |
| Sugar beet pulp, dry | – | – | 3 |
| Fermented soybean meal | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Potato protein | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Soybean protein concentrate | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Whey powder | 10.6 | 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Lactose | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Egg powder | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Soybean oil | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| MCFA (C8:0–25%; C10:0–25%, C12:0–30%) | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Calcium butyrate | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Limestone | 1.00 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| NaCl | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Monocalcium phosphate | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| L-Lysine sulfate, L-Lysine 54.6% | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| DL-Methionine | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| L-Threonine | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| L-Tryptophan | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Acidal NC (formic and acetic acids) | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
|
| |||
| ME swine (MJ/kg) | 13.9 | 13.8 | 13.8 |
| Crude protein (%) | 20.0 | 19.9 | 19.9 |
| Crude fat (%) | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Crude fiber (%) | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.9 |
| Lysine (%) | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| Methionine (%) | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Threonine (%) | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Tryptophan (%) | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Methionine + Cystine (%) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Ca (%) | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Total P (%) | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Available P (%) | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Na (%) | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
(i) basal diet (C-I – control group), (ii) basal diet supplemented with wheat bran extruded at 130°C and 25 rpm and fermented with Lactobacillus paracasei (TG-II), (iii) basal diet supplemented with dried sugar beet pulp (TG-III).
Composition of premix per 1 kg of feed: Vitamin A-18.180 IU; vitamin D3-2.000 IU; vitamin E-160 mg/kg; vitamin K3-5.00 mg; thiamine-3.64 mg; riboflavin-9.16 mg; choline chloride-4 mg; pyridoxine-4.60 mg; vitamin B12-0.05 mg; niacin-40.54 mg; pantothenic acid-22.54 mg; folic acid-1.80 mg; biotin-0.2 mg; Fe-150 mg; Cu-101 mg; Zn-100 mg; Mn-84 mg; I-0.72 mg; Co-0.50 mg; Se-0.40 mg. For all groups, the following were added to the compound feed: NSP Enzyme, Rovabio Excel AP, 50 g/t; endo-1,4-β-xylanase 1 100 VU /kg of feed; endo-1,3 (4)-glucanase, 1,500 VU /kg of feed and Phytase Axtra PHY 10000 TPT 2, 130 g/t, 1,300 FTU/kg feed.
Figure 1(A) Piglet weight; (B) Feed conversion ratio (FCR) (a, bdifferent letters indicate differences among treatments (p < 0.05); (i) basal diet (C-I – control group), (ii) basal diet with extruded-fermented wheat bran added (TG-II), (iii) basal diet with dried sugar beet pulp (TG-III). The data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 100/group).
Blood parameters of 18-day-old piglets.
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Immunoglobulin (IgA), g/L | 0.32 ± 0.011 | 0.32 ± 0.010 | 0.26 ± 0.081 | 0.500 | 0.306 | 0.317 | 0.279 |
| Immunoglobulin (IgM), g/L | 0.21 ± 0.005 | 0.2 ± 0.012 | 0.17 ± 0.094 | 0.317 | 0.309 | 0.308 | 0.667 |
| Immunoglobulin (IgG), g/L | 3.23 ± 0.748 b | 3.35 ± 1.441 b | 1.92 ± 1.316 a | 0.395 | 0.029 | 0.001 | 0.340 |
| Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), μIU/mL | 0.017 ± 0.002 b | 0.02 ± 0.001 c | 0.01 ± 0.002 a | 0.034 | <.001 | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Albumin (ALB), g/L | 32.4 ± 1.673 | 32.6 ± 0.548 | 30.8 ± 5.805 | 0.394 | 0.286 | 0.307 | 0.795 |
| Total protein (TP), g/L | 35.6 ± 11.768 a | 44.0 ± 2.549 b | 41.6 ± 3.159 b | 0.017 | 0.039 | 0.085 | 0.410 |
| Urea, mmol/L | 1.92 ± 0.268 a | 2.0 ± 0.292 b | 1.88 ± 0.1304 a | 0.013 | 0.333 | 0.163 | 0.829 |
| Creatinine (CREA), μmol/L | 58.02 ± 8.067 b | 61.88 ± 4.003 b | 55.58 ± 9.587 a | 0.121 | 0.044 | 0.095 | 0.617 |
| Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), U/L | 41.2 ± 2.698 a | 49.0 ± 6.483 b | 46.6 ± 9.788 b | 0.032 | 0.127 | 0.107 | 0.469 |
| Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), U/L | 33.8 ± 5.016 a | 37.0 ± 3.391 b | 34.0 ± 8.916 a | 0.038 | 0.469 | 0.223 | 0.803 |
| Alkaline phosphatase (AP), U/L | 1,077.2 ± 313.56 b | 907.2 ± 127.92 a | 941.8 ± 323.61 a | 0.127 | 0.001 | 0.394 | 0.730 |
| Total bilirubin (pmol/L) | 9.92 ± 1.294 | 10.72 ± 8.356 | 8.88 ± 3.439 | 0.431 | 0.245 | 0.292 | 0.913 |
| Cholesterol (CHOL), mmol/L | 4.852 ± 1.006 a | 5.2 ± 1.178 b | 4.97 ± 1.187 a | 0.037 | 0.195 | 0.068 | 0.930 |
| High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), mmol/L | 1.894 ± 0.272 | 1.91 ± 0.233 | 1.61 ± 0.255 | 0.235 | 0.069 | 0.071 | 0.333 |
| Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), mmol/L | 2.984 ± 0.853 a | 3.19 ± 0.919 b | 3.29 ± 0.994 b | 0.016 | 0.032 | 0.073 | 0.919 |
| Triglycerides (TG), mmol/L | 1.908 ± 0.096 b | 1.79 ± 0.152 b | 1.4 ± 0.079 a | 0.248 | 0.018 | 0.006 | 0.417 |
| Glucose (GLU), nmol/L | 6.94 ± 0.462 | 7.14 ± 1.122 | 6.74 ± 0.607 | 0.326 | 0.07 | 0.155 | 0.827 |
| Triiodothyronine (T3), nmol/L | 2.462 ± 0.165 b | 2.35 ± 0.245 b | 2.2 ± 0.250 a | 0.066 | 0.017 | 0.074 | 0.410 |
| Thyroxine (T4), μ d/L | 4.54 ± 0.503 b | 3.8 ± 0.367 a | 4.1 ± 0.648 a | 0.007 | 0.016 | 0.103 | 0.288 |
(i) basal diet (C-I – control group), (ii) basal diet with extruded-fermented wheat bran added (TG-II), (iii) basal diet with dried sugar beet pulp added (TG-III). a, bDifferent letters indicate differences among treatments (p ≤ 0.05).
The pH, dry matter and color coordinates of piglet feces.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 1 | 6.61 ± 0.82 | 6.75 ± 0.45 | 6.98 ± 0.31 | 0.562 |
| 21 | 6.64 ± 0.56 | 7.01 ± 0.77 | 6.41 ± 0.94 | ||
| Dry matter (%) | 1 | 41.21 ± 8.42 | 40.32 ± 4.74 | 39.43 ± 5.71 | 0.009 |
| 21 | 21.52 ± 3.07 | 48.72 ± 8.62 | 42.83 ± 8.35 | ||
| Texture (mJ) | 1 | 0.200 ± 0.038 | 0.200 ± 0.035 | 0.175 ± 0.029 | 0.665 |
| 21 | 0.100 ± 0.023 | 0.100 ± 0.016 | 0.100 ± 0.012 | ||
|
| |||||
| L* | 1 | 34.62 ± 3.72 | 35.99 ± 2.89 | 34.2 ± 3.73 | 0.348 |
| 21 | 41.17 ± 5.22 | 40.85 ± 5.54 | 33.7 ± 3.43 | ||
| a* | 1 | 0.200 ± 0.029 | 0.800 ± 0.137 | 0.010 ± 0.001 | <0.001 |
| 21 | 1.27 ± 0.17 | −1.46 ± 0.234 | −1.51 ± 0.221 | ||
| b* | 1 | 9.20 ± 1.42 | 6.78 ± 1.06 | 6.88 ± 1.06 | 0.242 |
| 21 | 12.27 ± 2.12 | 11.26 ± 2.46 | 7.85 ± 1.65 | ||
(i) basal diet (C-I – control group), (ii) basal diet with extruded-fermented wheat bran added (TG-II), (iii) basal diet with dried sugar beet pulp added (TG-III). The data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 40/group). 1 – at the beginning of the experiment; 21 – at the end of the experiment.; L*, lightness; a*, redness or -a*, greenness; b*, yellowness or -b*, blueness; NBS, National Bureau of Standards units; Treat. Int., treatment interaction.
Different capitals indicate significant time-related differences (p ≤ 0.05).
Different letters indicate differences among treatments (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2Volatile compound (VC) profile of piglet feces [(i) basal diet (C-I – control group), (ii) basal diet with extruded-fermented wheat bran added (TG-II), (iii) basal diet with dried sugar beet pulp (TG-III)].
Microbiological parameters of piglets' fecal samples.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCE | 1 | 7.17 ± 0.24 | 7.73 ± 0.368 | 8.03 ± 0.304 | 0.247 |
| 21 | 7.31 ± 0.318 | 6.7 ± 0.339 | 7.12 ± 1.365 | ||
| LAB | 1 | 5.7 ± 0.099 | 6.17 ± 0.007 | 5.97 ± 0.707 | 0.014 |
| 21 | 6.11 ± 0.12 | 7.87 ± 0.106 | 6.85 ± 0.304 | ||
| TCM | 1 | 7.8 ± 0.361 | 8.79 ± 0.127 | 8.62 ± 0.919 | 0.072 |
| 21 | 8.5 ± 0.523 | 8.26 ± 0.29 | 7.73 ± 0.742 | ||
|
| 1 | 3.52 ± 0.339 | 6.09 ± 1.266 | 3.23 ± 0.368 | 0.238 |
| 21 | 5.27 ± 2.362 | 5.45 ± 1.867 | 5.26 ± 0.983 | ||
| Y/F | 1 | 5.32 ± 0.276 | 5.98 ± 0.233 | 5.02 ± 1.223 | 0.275 |
| 21 | 5.58 ± 0.417 | 6.12 ± 0.856c | 4.12 ± 0.127 |
(i) basal diet (C-I – control group), (ii) basal diet with extruded-fermented wheat bran added (TG-II), (iii) basal diet with dried sugar beet pulp added (TG-III). The data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 40/group). 1 – at the beginning of the experiment; 21 – at the end of the experiment. CFU, colony-forming units; LAB, lactic acid bacteria count; TCE, total count of enterobacteria; TCM, total count of aerobic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms; Y/F, yeast/fungi.;
Different capital letters indicate significant time-related differences (p ≤ 0.05).
Different letters indicate differences among treatments (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3Prevalence of bacterial genera in the gut of piglets before the experiment.
Figure 4Bacterial composition differences (%) between the animal groups at the end of the experiment [The most prevalent genera (prevalence of at least 1% out of the total amount of bacteria) are presented. (i) Basal diet (C-I – control group), (ii) basal diet with extruded-fermented wheat bran added (TG-II), (iii) basal diet with dried sugar beet pulp added (TG-III)] (* insignificant results between TG-II and TG-III, **insignificant results between C-I and TG-II, ***insignificant results between C-I and TG-III).
Figure 5The data about bacterial genera prevalence in different groups of piglets.