| Literature DB >> 36104681 |
Siyu Chen1, Aimei Li1, Jianjiang Wu1, Yidan Huang1, Tiantian Zou1, Taiwangu Tailaiti1, Jiang Wang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reperfusion of ischemic tissue has adverse impact on the myocardium. Dexmedetomidine (Dex) is a α2-adrenergic receptor (α2-AR) agonist with sedative and analgesic effects. Macrophage migration inhibition factor (MIF) is a pressure-regulating cytokine and is responsible for inflammatory and immune diseases. This study aims to reveal the consequences of Dex on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in young mice.Entities:
Keywords: Dexmedetomidine (Dex); Heart ischemia-reperfusion injury; MIF/AMPK/GLUT4 axis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36104681 PMCID: PMC9472426 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01825-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Anesthesiol ISSN: 1471-2253 Impact factor: 2.376
Fig. 1Serum inflammatory factors were detected by ELISA
Analysis of serum IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α levels in each group ()
| Group | IL-6(pg/ml) | IL-10(pg/ml) | TNF-α(pg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.101 ± 3.020 | 128.350 ± 12.493 | 43.596 ± 10.053 | |
| 13.930 ± 2.722△ | 103.836 ± 16.310△ | 64.519 ± 12.036△ | |
| 17.465 ± 3.330△▲ | 85.482 ± 12.824△▲ | 89.267 ± 17.460△▲ | |
| 8.932 ± 1.558△▲▽ | 130.984 ± 17.319▲▽ | 45.749 ± 13.334▲▽ | |
| 16.960 ± 2.195△▲▼ | 101.534 ± 11.013△▽▼ | 61.667 ± 16.406△▽▼ |
△P < 0.05 vs. Sham group; ▲P < 0.05 vs. I/R group; ▽P < 0.05 vs. I/R + ISO-1 group; ▼P < 0.05 vs. I/R + Dex group
Fig. 2H&E staining results of mouse myocardium
Fig. 3Apoptosis was detected by TUNEL and ROS. A, B Representative images of TUNEL staining showing DEX inhibits apoptosis of cardiomyocytes. C Representative ROS images also showed that DEX inhibited myocardial cell apoptosis
Fig. 4ATP levels in each group
Effects of different intervention groups on the results of echocardiography in young mice (, n = 9)
| Group | HR | SV | EF | FS | CO | LVPWs | LVPWd | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 451.34 ± 19.67 | 20.71 ± 4.21 | 50.33 ± 6.41 | 24.85 ± 3.77 | 9.35 ± 0.39 | 1.61 ± 0.41 | 1.39 ± 0.49 | 1.19 ± 0.15 | |
| 509.85 ± 66.81 | 22.02 ± 2.01 | 66.32 ± 10.58 | 35.84 ± 7.62 | 11.35 ± 2.52 | 1.52 ± 0.13 | 1.01 ± 0.13 | 1.28 ± 0.22 | |
| 521.41 ± 36.62 | 18.35 ± 4.13 | 35.42 ± 8.20 | 16.61 ± 4.31 | 9.57 ± 2.15 | 1.01 ± 0.05 | 0.91 ± 0.07 | 1.37 ± 0.16 | |
| 529.94 ± 75.85 | 25.82 ± 2.77 | 78.46 ± 10.86 | 47.28 ± 6.53 | 13.62 ± 2.32 | 1.79 ± 0.62 | 1.19 ± 0.15 | 1.32 ± 0.21 | |
| 582.19 ± 42.68 | 19.75 ± 3.86 | 54.46 ± 11.63 | 27.64 ± 7.31 | 11.35 ± 1.44 | 1.37 ± 0.29 | 0.95 ± 0.16 | 1.19 ± 0.17 |
Abbreviations: HR heart rate, SV stroke volume, EF ejection fraction, FS fractional shortening, CO cardiac output, LVPWs Left ventricle posterior wall thickness in systole, LVPWd Left ventricle posterior wall thickness in systole, A Aorta
Fig. 5Representative image of mouse cardiac ultrasound
Fig. 6Electron microscopy of representative mouse myocardial sections in different experimental groups (200 nm). A: sham group; (B): the I/R group; (C): the I/R + ISO-1 group; (D): the I/R + Dex group; (E): the I/R + Dex + ISO-1 group
Fig. 7Dex protects myocardial IRI through MIF/AMPK/GLUT4 NF-κB axis