Suraj Prasad Sinha1, Manish Bajracharya2, Chiung-Shing Huang3,4, Ellen Wen-Ching Ko5,6,7. 1. Craniofacial Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan. 2. Dental Department, Orthodontic Unit, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. 3. Graduate Institute of Craniofacial and Dental Science, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. 4. Department of Craniofacial Orthodontic, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 6F, 199, Tung Hwa North Road, Taipei, 105, Taiwan. 5. Graduate Institute of Craniofacial and Dental Science, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. ellenko.wc@msa.hinet.net. 6. Department of Craniofacial Orthodontic, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 6F, 199, Tung Hwa North Road, Taipei, 105, Taiwan. ellenko.wc@msa.hinet.net. 7. Department of Dentistry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkous, Taiwan. ellenko.wc@msa.hinet.net.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study investigated orthodontic tooth movement by comparing various horizontal and angular measures of the teeth having different sinus-root relationship (SRR) of patients undergoing first premolar extraction treatment protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 45 Taiwanese adult patients, classified as the control group (n = 15) and the sinus group (n = 30) according to SRR. The control group had type I SRR (sinus floor above the level connecting the buccal and palatal root apices), whereas the sinus group included patients with type V SRR (the buccal and palatal root displayed apical protrusion into the sinus floor). Morphology was identified using pretreatment orthopantomograms. Lateral cephalometric measurements were conducted before treatment (T1) and at debonding (T2). RESULTS: Post debonding, there were no statistically significant difference in the two groups. However, the incisors in the control group became marginally more upright than those of the sinus group, and the molars demonstrated tipping movement with minimal anchorage loss in the sinus group than in the control group. The total treatment time was not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The study revealed that the sinus-root relationship does not affect the orthodontic tooth movement. However, a more extensive 3-D study with larger sample size is strongly recommended before coming to any conclusion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The lining of the floor of the maxillary sinus does not affect the orthodontic tooth movement.
OBJECTIVE: The study investigated orthodontic tooth movement by comparing various horizontal and angular measures of the teeth having different sinus-root relationship (SRR) of patients undergoing first premolar extraction treatment protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 45 Taiwanese adult patients, classified as the control group (n = 15) and the sinus group (n = 30) according to SRR. The control group had type I SRR (sinus floor above the level connecting the buccal and palatal root apices), whereas the sinus group included patients with type V SRR (the buccal and palatal root displayed apical protrusion into the sinus floor). Morphology was identified using pretreatment orthopantomograms. Lateral cephalometric measurements were conducted before treatment (T1) and at debonding (T2). RESULTS: Post debonding, there were no statistically significant difference in the two groups. However, the incisors in the control group became marginally more upright than those of the sinus group, and the molars demonstrated tipping movement with minimal anchorage loss in the sinus group than in the control group. The total treatment time was not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The study revealed that the sinus-root relationship does not affect the orthodontic tooth movement. However, a more extensive 3-D study with larger sample size is strongly recommended before coming to any conclusion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The lining of the floor of the maxillary sinus does not affect the orthodontic tooth movement.