Literature DB >> 23455415

Skeletal and dental variables related to the stability of orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion with a surgery-first approach.

Ellen Wen-Ching Ko1, Shao Cheng Lin, Yu Ray Chen, Chiung Shing Huang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objectives of the study were to identify the parameters related to skeletal stability after orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion using a surgery-first approach and to analyze the factors correlated with surgical relapse.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients were included. Serial cephalometric radiographs were traced and superimposed to investigate surgical stability at the initial examination, 1 week postoperatively, and after orthodontic debonding (12.22 mo after surgery). Patient grouping was based on the amount of horizontal relapse at the innermost point of the contour of the mandible between the incisor tooth and the bony chin, the B point (less stable group, n = 15; highly stable group, n = 18). Parameters, such as presurgical skeletal and dental variables, the amount of surgical setback, and total treatment duration, were compared between groups and analyzed for correlations with surgical stability.
RESULTS: The mean setback at the innermost point of the contour of the mandible between the incisor tooth and the bony chin was 11.19 mm, and the mean relapse rate was 12.46%. The amount of surgical setback, overbite (positive values), overjet, depth of the curve of Spee, and lower anterior facial height showed statistically significant differences between groups. The amount of surgical setback, overbite (positive values), overjet, and depth of the curve of Spee showed statistically significant correlations with the amount of relapse. Skeletal relapse of the mandible increased significantly as the overbite increased.
CONCLUSION: The factors for instability in the surgery-first approach include a larger overbite, a deeper curve of Spee, a greater negative overjet, and a greater mandibular setback. The initial overbite may be an indicator to predict possible skeletal relapse of mandibular setback.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23455415     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  14 in total

1.  Surgery-first: a new approach to orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  F DE Nuccio; F DE Nuccio; M M D'Emidio; S Pelo
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-02-14

2.  Does the floor of the maxillary sinus affect tooth movement for premolar extraction space closure?

Authors:  Suraj Prasad Sinha; Manish Bajracharya; Chiung-Shing Huang; Ellen Wen-Ching Ko
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.606

3.  A Retrospective Cohort Study of 45 Cases Treated With Surgery First Approach in Orthognathic Surgery and a Short Review.

Authors:  Gaurav Singh; Utsav Singh Gurung; Madan Mishra; Amit Gaur
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-08-13

4.  Qualitative correlation between postoperatively increased vertical dimension and mandibular position in skeletal class III using partial-least-square path modeling.

Authors:  Na-Ri Kim; Soo-Byung Park; Jihyun Lee; Youn-Kyung Choi; Sang Min Shin; Yong-Seok Choi; Yong-Il Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-06-05

5.  Modern Surgery-First Approach Concept in Cleft-Orthognathic Surgery: A Comparative Cohort Study with 3D Quantitative Analysis of Surgical-Occlusion Setup.

Authors:  Hyung Joon Seo; Rafael Denadai; Betty Chien-Jung Pai; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Evaluation of stability after pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery using cone-beam computed tomography: A comparison with conventional treatment.

Authors:  Hye-Rim Ann; Young-Soo Jung; Kee-Joon Lee; Hyoung-Seon Baik
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Comparison of changes in the transverse dental axis between patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry treated by orthognathic surgery with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Han-Sol Song; Sung-Hwan Choi; Jung-Yul Cha; Kee-Joon Lee; Hyung-Seog Yu
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Comparative study of postoperative stability between conventional orthognathic surgery and a surgery-first orthognathic approach after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for skeletal class III correction.

Authors:  Deuk-Hyun Mah; Su-Gwan Kim; Ji-Su Oh; Jae-Seek You; Seo-Yun Jung; Won-Gi Kim; Kyung-Hwan Yu
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-02-20

Review 9.  Facial asymmetry correction: From conventional orthognathic treatment to surgery-first approach.

Authors:  Tahereh Hosseinzadeh Nik; Elaheh Gholamrezaei; Mohammad Ali Keshvad
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2019

10.  Does craniofacial morphology affect third molars impaction? Results from a population-based study in northeastern Germany.

Authors:  Stefan Kindler; Till Ittermann; Robin Bülow; Birte Holtfreter; Catharina Klausenitz; Philine Metelmann; Maria Mksoud; Christiane Pink; Christian Seebauer; Thomas Kocher; Thomas Koppe; Karl-Friedrich Krey; Hans-Robert Metelmann; Henry Völzke; Amro Daboul
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.