Literature DB >> 36101683

The relationship between sleep duration and health status in Qatar's population.

Maryam A Al-Thani1, Salma M Khaled1.   

Abstract

Knowledge of sleep duration correlates is limited to developed countries with a lack of studies in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR). Qatar is a rapidly developing country in the EMR with three distinct population groups: Qatari nationals (QNs) or natives; higher income white-collar expatriates (WCEs), and blue-collar workers (BCEs) who are mostly male laborers from South Asia. The aim of this study was to explore the association between sleep duration, chronic health conditions, important lifestyle variables, and sociodemographic characteristics in a representative sample of Qatar's general population. A total of 2523 surveys were administered over the phone and a final sample of 2500 was retained. The overall prevalence of sleeping < 7hrs was observed at 54%, while 42% of respondents reported sleeping 7-8hrs and 4% reported sleeping > 8hrs. Qatar's population exhibited low prevalence of normal sleep duration and high prevalence of short sleep duration. Participants who reported the poorest health status had increased odds of sleeping < 7hrs (OR 1.38, P ​= ​0.04) compared with those who reported good health after adjustment for covariates. Additionally, participants with two or more diagnosed illnesses had higher odds of sleeping < 7hrs (OR 1.58, P ​= ​0.02) compared to healthy participants. An increase in odds of sleeping < 7hrs was also observed in participants with obesity (OR 1.58, P ​= ​0.02). Qatar's population exhibited high prevalence of short sleep duration, which was significantly associated with poor rated health, obesity, and chronic illness independent of age, gender, or social class.
© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal Society for Public Health.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 36101683      PMCID: PMC9461638          DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2020.100056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Pract (Oxf)        ISSN: 2666-5352


Introduction

Sleep is a vital biological process for human health. Sleep is also a personal behavior subjected to social and environmental influences. Increasingly, sleep duration is considered a predictor of an individual’s health status. Previous studies conducted in developed countries report a U-shaped relationship between sleep duration and all-cause mortality with short and long sleepers are considered at greater risk [1,2]. Additionally, a U-shaped association between self-reported health status and sleep duration was previously reported in which Asian countries with the shortest sleep duration also reported the poorest health rating. However, this U-shaped relationship is not consistent across all studies [3]. Additionally, there is no consistent evidence that overall sleep duration is declining in recent cohorts with Bulgaria, Poland, Canada, France, Britain, Korea and the Netherlands showing an increase, while Japan, Russia, Finland, Germany, Belgium and Austria report a decrease in total amount of sleep [4,6,7]. In light of the potential impact of sleep duration on health, public health efforts to improve sleep behavior are increasing worldwide. However, knowledge of correlates of sleep duration is limited to developed countries with dearth of studies conducted in countries of the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR). Of particular interest is the association between short sleep and ill health as sufficient sleep is required for wellbeing and optimal function [8]. Obtaining sufficient sleep is becoming harder given our 24-h driven modern society. In addition, our increasing reliance on technology may also contribute to lack of sleep. For example, a recent study showed that prolonged exposure to artificial lighting via screen-based digital technology interrupted daily circadian sleep-wake cycle potentially contributing to shorter sleep duration [9]. Accumulating evidence over the past few decades also supports the association between insufficient sleep and many health conditions including cardiovascular disease, hypertension, stroke, type 2 diabetes, obesity, poor cognitive function, and poor mental health [10,11]. The link between short sleep duration and its adverse health effects are thought to be bidirectional with short sleep both a risk factor for and a symptom of poor health [35]. Unlike short sleep, there is currently insufficient information supporting plausible underlying biological mechanisms linking long sleep and disease [12]. Common mental disorders like depression, certain sociodemographic characteristics (low income, employment status, ethnicity), obesity, and poor lifestyle choices (smoking, physical inactivity) have been also associated with short and long sleep duration [14,15]. These variables are also known to be associated with higher morbidity and mortality [16]. As such, these variables may be important confounders or causal mediators of the association between sleep duration and ill health. Qatar is a developing country in the EMR undergoing rapid economic growth, modernization, and sociocultural changes. There is a dearth of studies in Qatar and this region on potential predictors of short and long sleep duration and their associations with chronic disease in the general population. Most published studies report insufficient sleep in children and young adults of these populations [[17], [18], [19]]. A hospital-based study showed that 1 in every 3 Saudi adults reported short sleep duration [20]. Given little research exist on this topic in Qatar and other EMR countries; the aim of this study was to explore the association between sleep duration and chronic health conditions, important lifestyle variables, sociodemographic characteristics, depressive symptoms, and sleep duration in a representative sample of Qatar’s general population.

Material and methods

Survey administration

The current study was approved by the Qatar University’s institutional review board (IRB) and participants provided informed consent to participate in a survey conducted by Qatar University’s Social and Economic Survey Research Institute on April of 2018 using computer-assisted telephone interviewing. The interviewers received training and were monitored to ensure questions were asked appropriately and answers were recorded accurately. The survey was administered in nine most used languages among Qatar’s population including Arabic, English, Urdu, Hindi, Malayalam, Nepalese, Bengali and Tamil.

Study sample and characteristics

Qatar has a diverse population with three distinct social classes or population groups sharing a similar social structure with most other countries in the Arabian Gulf. The first group is Qatari nationals (QNs) or natives; most are of tribal origins with shared ancestry and traditions. The second group is higher income white-collar expatriates (WCEs) who are highly skilled, educated, and come from all over the world. The third group is blue-collar workers (BCEs) who are mostly young male laborers from South Asia and South East Asia with little or no formal education. The target population of 18 years and over was sampled from three diverse social groups (QNs, WCEs, and BCEs) within Qatar’s resident population. Given the majority of adults in Qatar own at least one cellphone, our sample was selected from a frame of cellphone numbers using list-assisted sampling technique [21]. A total of 10579 phone survey interviews were attempted of which 5872 constituted our target population, there were at least seven attempts to complete the survey for every phone number, after “hard refusal” or unable to reach numbers, a total of 2523 surveys were completed giving a response rate of 43%. After removing cases for which sleep duration was unknown (n ​= ​18) or refused (n ​= ​1) and excluding data entry error of 0 ​h (n ​= ​4), a final sample of 2500 was retained. The final study sample consisted of 833 QNs, 935 WCEs, and 732 BCEs. The sample was weighted to account for sampling selection probability, non-response, and calibration to align estimates with known population characteristics available from Census bureau [22]. The weighted proportions of QNs, WCEs, and BCEs were 7.9%, 27.0%, and 65.1%, respectively.

Measures

Sleep duration

The average sleep duration was based on the following survey question: “On an average night, how many hours do you sleep?” To maintain power and precision, responses were collapsed into three categories: less than 7 ​hrs, 7–8 ​hrs and more than 8 ​hrs based on previous literature of the U-shaped association and health related outcomes [23,24].

Diagnosed chronic illness

Chronic disease status was defined as having any of the following conditions in response to the following survey question and response options: “Have you been diagnosed or told by your doctor that you have any of the following conditions?” The list of health conditions included: “Hypertension or high blood pressure?”, “Cardiovascular or heart disease?”, “Diabetes?”, “Asthma?”, “Gastrointestinal disorder?”, “Depression?”, “Other mental or Psychological Problems such as anxiety, or sleep problems?”, “Cancer”, “Disability (physical, mental, visual, hearing, etc.)”, “Thyroid disorder?”, “Any other condition not mentioned?”.

Depression

Depressive symptoms were assessed using the ultra-brief patient health questionnaire (PHQ-2) [25]. The performance of the PHQ-2 was reported to be acceptable compared to longer depression screening instruments. A score that ranges from 0 to 6 was computed, and a cutoff point ≥3 was used as proxy-measure of clinically significant depression [26].

Body Mass Index & life style variables

Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated from self-reported weight and height measurements. Accordingly, participants were classified as underweight if BMI ≤18.4, normal weight if BMI≥18.5 and BMI ≥24.9, and overweight or obese if BMI ≥25. Sedentary behavior was measured using the question: “Physical activity or exercise includes activities such as walking briskly, jogging, team sports, or any other activity in which you breathe harder or feel warmer, do you currently engage in physical activity on a regular basis?” Smoking status was also assessed using the following question: “At the present time, do you smoke cigarettes daily, occasionally or not at all?” Responses were grouped into current versus non-current smoker (never and former smoker status). Perceived health status was measured on a scale from 0 to 100 using the question: “I would now like to ask you to imagine a scale that looks like a thermometer. The best health state you can imagine is marked 100 (one hundred) at the top of the scale and the worst state you can imagine is marked 0 (zero) at the bottom. I would now like you to tell me the point on this thermometer where you would rate your own health state today”. Responses were categorized into three quantiles of “poor”, “good” and “very good”.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive analysis explored characteristics of the sample. Weighted proportions with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to account for the complex survey design and nonresponse. To correct for survey design effects on the variances of reported proportions, the F-transformed version of the Pearson Chi-square statistic was used. Multinomial logistic regression models with sampling weights that account for complex survey design were used to examine the association between socioeconomics, lifestyle variables, and health characteristics that could potentially determine sleep duration (dependent variable). All models were adjusted for age, gender and social group/class. Statistical significance was determined using an alpha value of 0.05. All analyses were conducted in STATA 14.

Results

Characteristics of the sample in relation to sleep duration are shown in Table 1. Overall, high prevalence of short sleep duration was observed at 54%, while 42% of respondents reported normal, and 4% reported long sleep durations, respectively. The highest proportion of short sleepers was in BCE (58%) and of long sleepers was in QNs (8%).
Table 1

Sleep duration by sample characteristics.

Sleep duration
Short ( <7 ​hrs)
Normal (7–8 hrs)
Long ( >8 ​hrs)

%CI%CI%CIP-value
Overall (n ​= ​2500)54.3551.25–57.4242.1339.11–45.213.522.64–4.68NA
Respondent Group
Qataris (n ​= ​833)52.8149.30–56.3038.8635.49–42.338.336.53–10.57<0.001∗
White collar Expats (n ​= ​935)45.5641.55–49.6350.4146.33–54.494.022.65–6.07
Blue collar Expats (n ​= ​732)58.1853.75–62.4739.0934.86–43.492.731.66–4.46
Gender
Male (n ​= ​1807)55.9952.42–59.5040.9937.53–44.543.022.07–4.380.004∗
Female (n ​= ​693)46.8941.44–52.4247.3141.81–52.875.804.02–8.31
Marital status
Married (n ​= ​1747)56.1752.51–59.7740.8337.29–44.473.002.01–4.450.061
Divorced or Widow (n ​= ​125)47.9433.13–63.1248.4033.59–63.493.661.27–10.11
Never married (n ​= ​622)48.0942.16–54.0746.2740.41–52.245.643.90–8.10
Income
Low (n ​= ​497)49.4442.76–56.1547.4140.77–54.143.151.73–5.650.397
Moderate (n ​= ​1063)56.9252.23–61.4939.5235.06–44.163.562.19–5.74
High (n ​= ​803)53.3547.96–58.6743.1537.90–48.563.492.24–5.41
Age
less than 25 (n ​= ​284)43.8834.50–53.7349.7440.17–59.326.384.17–9.63<0.001∗
25-34 (n ​= ​845)47.9542.74–53.2147.1141.91–52.374.943.13–7.72
35-44 (n ​= ​667)61.3155.44–66.8737.3631.85–43.221.330.67–2.64
45-54 (n ​= ​377)59.7251.71–67.2539.8032.29–47.820.480.15–1.47
55+ (n ​= ​201)60.0048.86–70.2036.0726.32–47.123.931.28–11.42
Education level
Less than High school (n ​= ​580)61.7756.12–67.1335.3230.08–40.942.911.59–5.260.003∗
High school (n ​= ​688)49.9043.91–55.8945.6639.76–51.694.442.78–7.01
Post-Secondary (n ​= ​1225)49.4645.26–53.6747.0842.91–51.293.462.29–5.20
Current Smoker
Yes (n ​= ​624)55.7949.58–61.8141.0335.10–47.223.191.80–5.590.814
No (n ​= ​1874)53.8150.23–57.3642.5539.07–46.123.632.60–5.04
Physically Active
Yes (n ​= ​1073)51.3946.60–56.1545.0640.37–49.853.552.24–5.570.266
No (n ​= ​1426)56.2352.17–60.2140.2736.36–44.303.502.42–5.04
Number of chronic illness
0 (n ​= ​1173)49.3344.86–53.8047.3342.91–51.803.342.28–4.870.001∗
1 (n ​= ​725)54.2048.40–59.8940.9335.42–46.684.872.89–8.09
2 or more (n ​= ​602)64.6258.25–70.5233.0027.22–39.352.371.18–4.70
Body Mass Index
Underweight (n ​= ​69)45.9129.80–62.9252.7935.91–69.041.310.46–3.640.050∗
Normal Weight (n ​= ​815)50.2044.97–55.4445.3740.23–50.624.422.83–6.85
Overweight (n ​= ​890)54.4149.20–59.5342.1737.14–47.373.422.07–5.60
Obese (n ​= ​542)62.4255.52–68.8535.6529.31–42.541.931.05–3.51
Depression (PHQ2)
Yes (n ​= ​325)54.0550.67–57.3942.3739.08–45.723.582.65–4.830.911
No (n ​= ​2127)55.5847.27–63.6041.4133.52–49.763.011.12–7.86
Perceived Health
Poor (n ​= ​878)59.4254.30–64.3437.0432.25–42.103.542.10–5.920.038∗
Good (n ​= ​982)52.5547.50–57.5544.6739.72–49.712.781.86–4.16
Very Good (n ​= ​585)48.3642.10–54.6847.7941.54–54.113.852.25–6.50

NA: Not Applicable

Sleep duration by sample characteristics. NA: Not Applicable Multinomial logistic regression models are presented in Table 2 that show associations between socioeconomics and sleep duration. WCEs had lower odds of sleeping < 7hrs (OR 0.62, P ​= ​0.001); Compared to Qataris, lower odds of sleeping ​> ​8hrs was found in WCEs (OR 0.45, P ​= ​0.009) and BCEs (OR 0.25, P ​< ​0.001). Participants younger than 25 years of age had lower odds of sleeping < 7hrs (OR 0.47, P ​= ​0.01) compared to 35–44 year olds. Participants between 25 and 34 years of age had lower odds of sleeping < 7hrs (OR 0.59, P ​= ​0.003) and increased odds of sleeping ​> ​8hrs (OR 3.23, P ​= ​0.01) compared to 35–44 year olds. Participants between the ages of 45–55 years had lower odds of sleeping > 8hrs compared to 35–44 year olds (OR 0.09, P ​= ​0.003).
Table 2

Multinomial logistic regression models.

Sleep durationShort ( <7 hrs) Vs Normal (7–8 hrs)Long ( >8hrs) Vs Normal (7–8 hrs)
ORCIP-valueORCIP-value
Model 1:Socio-economic factors
Respondent Group
QatarisRef
White collar Expats0.620.47–0.820.001a0.450.25–0.810.008a
Blue collar Expats0.920.67–1.280.630.250.12–0.54<0.001a
Gender
MaleRef
Female0.860.63–1.160.321.310.68–2.500.42
Marital status
MarriedRef
Divorced or Widow0.920.44–1.920.820.240.07–0.810.02∗
Never married1.050.73–1.500.790.810.41–1.570.53
Income
Low0.770.53–1.130.180.590.27–1.310.20
ModerateRef
High0.800.58–1.100.171.010.47–2.150.98
Age
less than 250.470.27–0.830.01a2.830.92–8.670.07a
25–340.590.42–0.840.003a3.231.30–8.030.01a
35–44Ref
45–540.940.62–1.420.760.090.02–0.430.003a
55+0.930.53–1.630.812.590.60–11.080.20
Education
Less than High school1.370.92–2.040.181.450.44–4.800.55
High school0.840.59–1.190.321.780.76–4.150.18
Post-SecondaryRef
Model 2:Lifestyle
Current Smoker
Yes1.020.73–1.400.931.170.51–2.730.71
NoRef
Physically Active
YesRef
No1.080.83–1.420.561.230.64–2.360.54
Perceived wellbeing
Poor1.381.02–1.880.04a1.370.64–2.930.41
GoodRef
Very Good0.740.52–1.070.111.400.65–3.010.39
Model 3: Health
Number of chronic illness
NoneRef
11.150.83–1.600.411.400.62–3.160.42
2 or more1.581.09–2.310.02a1.170.45–3.040.74
Body Mass Index
Underweight0.640.30–1.360.250.240.07–0.760.02a
Normal WeightRef
Overweight1.180.85–1.640.330.960.47–1.940.90
Obese1.581.06–2.350.02∗0.550.24–1.250.15
Depression
Yes0.990.66–1.490.961.100.36–3.350.87
NoRef

Adjusted for Gender, Age, and respondent group.

Multinomial logistic regression models. Adjusted for Gender, Age, and respondent group. As for other associations shown in Table 2, participants who reported the poorest health status had increased odds of sleeping < 7hrs (OR 1.38, P ​= ​0.04) compared with those who reported good health. Additionally, participants with two or more diagnosed illnesses had higher odds of sleeping < 7hrs (OR 1.58, P ​= ​0.02) compared to healthy participants. An increase in odds of sleeping < 7hrs was also observed in participants with obesity (OR 1.58, P0.02). Those who were underweight had lower odds of sleeping > 8hrs (OR ​= ​0.24, p ​= ​0.02) as compared to normal weight. No significant associations were found between current smoking status, physical inactivity, and depression status and either short or long sleep durations relative to normal sleep durations (Table 2).

Discussion

Our findings supported high prevalence of short sleepers (54%) compared to low prevalence of long sleepers (4%) in the general population of Qatar. On average, only 42% of the population reported sleeping between 7 and 8 ​h per night. Therefore, Qatar’s population exhibited one of the lowest prevalence of normal sleep duration and the highest prevalence of short sleep duration compared to other countries [14,15,27,28]. Qatar continues to witness unprecedented growth in its economy and urban infrastructure, which may contribute to the fast-pace of its society, today. Our study also showed increased odds of short sleep in those reporting at least two diseases, but no statistically significant increase in the odds of chronic illness among long sleepers. Therefore, our findings did not support a U-shaped association between sleep duration and chronic disease status. Similar pattern of associations were also observed for obesity status in relation to short and long sleep durations. Participant’s social group, age, perceived health, and BMI were found to be strongly associated with sleep duration. However, no association was observed between sleep duration and each of gender, marital status, income, smoking status, physical activity, or depression. The associations between short sleep duration, chronic illness, and obesity have been consistently documented by previous epidemiological [[5], [30], [31]] and experimental studies [32]. Short sleep has been shown to have an increased inflammatory effect [35], which is also consistent with the role of sleep as a reparative process with anti-oxidative and reparative effects on DNA [33]. A previous study reported positive associations between long sleep duration, chronic illness, and obesity [34]. Additionally, prolonged sleep was associated with a greater risk for these conditions compared to short sleep [37]. However, these findings werexdiu8 not replicated in the current study. Previous studies reported that alcohol consumption could be an important confounding factor especially for the positive association between long sleep and chronic disease [12,15]. This is because alcohol consumption as well as certain medications increase duration of light sleep at the expense of deep reparative sleep [38]. Qatar is a conservative Muslim country, where alcohol consumption is socially unacceptable practice. Although the prevalence of alcohol consumption in Qatar is unknown, it is expected to be lower than that of non-Muslim country, which could explain the weak (positive) and statistically non-significant association between long sleep and chronic disease status observed in this study. Inadequate power is also an equally plausible explanation for the lack of statistical significance in the association between long sleep and chronic disease, which could be due to small number of observations with long sleep duration in our sample. Similar to other studies, socioeconomic factors play important role [11] with BCEs showing the highest prevalence of short sleep whereas WCEs had the lowest. Surprisingly, there were no statistically significantly differences between BCEs when compared to Qataris for short sleep, which presents a puzzling social phenomenon in Qatar’s general population in which the lowest and highest income groups were comparably short sleepers. Several studies showed Asian countries report some of the shortest sleep durations [[39], [40], [41]]. The majority of BCEs in Qatar are from South Asia and South East Asia. The lack of difference in prevalence of short sleep between BCEs and QNs could be due to shared cultural attitudes towards sleep. QNs in our sample had higher prevalence of long sleep duration compared to BCEs, which could be due to employment status as the majority of BCEs were employed, but this was not the case for QNs. Equally, sleep patterns could be driven by differences in working hours and BCEs are more likely to work nightshifts than QNs. In our sample, the highest prevalence of short sleep was found among older participants, while highest prevalence of long sleep was found among participants in the youngest age group. These findings are consistent with previously reported decline in sleep duration with age in the general population [42]. Urbanization, economic growth, and higher working demands have been attributed to shorter duration of sleep in Asian countries [43]. Similarly, Qatar’s rapid modernization and economic growth could be contributing to reduced sleep duration in its general population. However, even when compared to similar modernized western countries, Asian countries still have shorter sleep duration that maybe driven to social and cultural differences [44]. Although previous studies report an association between sleep duration and depression [45], this was not the case in the current study. This could be due to the lack of assessment of sleep quality in our study, the self-reported nature of the study, or the lack of awareness of the effect of sleep on mental health.

Strengths and limitations

The strength of the study lies in its nationally representative sample of the adult population in Qatar. Although we observed high prevalence of short sleepers in our sample, the analysis may have lacked power to detect statistically significant effects between long sleep duration and poor health. The cross-sectional nature of the study is a major limitation and causation cannot be inferred. The study adjusted for a number of confounders, however, other important covariates were not measured such as sleep quality and caffeine consumption. Additionally, all variables were based on self-report, which may be subject to social desirability bias.

Implications

Qatar is a highly diverse country with a multicultural population similar to that of other Gulf countries. There has been little focus on the impact of sleep on health in this part of the world, which is surprising given that sleep habits are largely driven by the social environment. The current study is the first of its kind in such population. Better understanding of socioeconomic differences and sociocultural drivers of sleep behavior can improve public health and aid in design of effective awareness campaigns that target public health in relation to sleep. International guidelines for sleep disorder management recommend educational provision of healthy sleep habits [46]. The results of this study highlight the need for public awareness campaigns focused on importance of sleep for overall health, and optimal lifestyle habits that would help improve sleep quantity and reduce impact of short sleep on health in this population.

Conclusion

The present study is the first to examine sleep duration in a nationally represented sample of Qatar’s adult population and in the EMR region. The results demonstrate high prevalence of short sleep duration, which was associated with poor rated health, obesity, and chronic illness.

Authors’ contributions

All authors jointly contributed to the design of the study. Maryam A. Al-Thani & Salma M. Khaled contributed to the analysis of data. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of competin interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  40 in total

1.  Correlates of long sleep duration.

Authors:  Sanjay R Patel; Atul Malhotra; Daniel J Gottlieb; David P White; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  Sleep duration and obesity in a population-based study.

Authors:  Gabriella M Anic; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Polly A Newcomb; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Kathleen M Egan
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 3.492

3.  Association between sleep hygiene awareness and practice with sleep quality among Kuwait University students.

Authors:  S Al-Kandari; A Alsalem; S Al-Mutairi; D Al-Lumai; A Dawoud; M Moussa
Journal:  Sleep Health       Date:  2017-08-10

Review 4.  The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams; Bernd Löwe
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.238

5.  Mortality associated with short sleep duration: The evidence, the possible mechanisms, and the future.

Authors:  Michael A Grandner; Lauren Hale; Melisa Moore; Nirav P Patel
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 11.609

6.  Young Adults' Sleep Duration on Work Days: Differences between East and West.

Authors:  June C Lo; Ruth L F Leong; Kep-Kee Loh; Derk-Jan Dijk; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 7.  Circadian Rhythm and Sleep Disruption: Causes, Metabolic Consequences, and Countermeasures.

Authors:  Gregory D M Potter; Debra J Skene; Josephine Arendt; Janet E Cade; Peter J Grant; Laura J Hardie
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 19.871

8.  The prevalence of insomnia in the general population in China: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Lan Cao; Shi-Bin Wang; Bao-Liang Zhong; Ling Zhang; Gabor S Ungvari; Chee H Ng; Lu Li; Helen F K Chiu; Grace K I Lok; Jian-Ping Lu; Fu-Jun Jia; Yu-Tao Xiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Sleep and Cardio-Metabolic Disease.

Authors:  Francesco P Cappuccio; Michelle A Miller
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Association between perceived insufficient sleep, frequent mental distress, obesity and chronic diseases among US adults, 2009 behavioral risk factor surveillance system.

Authors:  Yong Liu; Janet B Croft; Anne G Wheaton; Geraldine S Perry; Daniel P Chapman; Tara W Strine; Lela R McKnight-Eily; Letitia Presley-Cantrell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.