| Literature DB >> 36101580 |
Paibul Suriyawongpaisal1, Sawitri Assanangkornchai2, Udomsak Saengow3, Ignacio J Martinez Moyano4,5, Roengrudee Patanavanich1, Pongthep Wongwatcharapaiboon6, Wichai Aekplakorn1, Thanita Thongtan7.
Abstract
Objectives: Globally, the burden of disease caused by alcohol use has been steadily increasing, including in Thailand. In this study, we aim to test the effectiveness of Anderson et al.'s suggested three approaches to change the collective social norms, which comprise of: (1) providing information and an understanding about alcohol use behaviour, its causes and distribution; (2) focusing strategies on groups rather than individuals; and (3) strengthening supportive laws, regulations and approaches. Study design: We employed a mixed-methods approach. Evidence was gathered from literature review and in-depth interviews with key individuals who are responsible for community-based interventions to alcohol marketing strategies in Thailand.Entities:
Keywords: Alcohol use; Health policy; Theory of changes
Year: 2021 PMID: 36101580 PMCID: PMC9461226 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2021.100116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Public Health Pract (Oxf) ISSN: 2666-5352
Fig. 1(upper) Alcohol sponsorship banner ads (green banners on the stand) at the Surin elephant round-up festival 2007; (lower) the alcohol sponsorship banner ads were replaced with no alcohol and smoking ads in 2008. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
List of the key informants who were interviewed.
| Major role and function | Type of Agencies | Number |
|---|---|---|
| Campaign organisers | Ministry of Health, NGOs, ThaiHealth | 3 |
| Policy champions | NGOs, Public hospitals | 8 |
NGO, non-governmental organisation.
Fig. 2Causal-loop diagram using the theory of change (ToC) depicting harmful alcohol use and related factors. Arrows indicate the direction of implied causality between factors. Signs (‘+’ and ‘–‘) indicate the polarity of the relationship. A ‘+’ sign means that, all else equal, increases in the factor at the beginning of the arrow will result in increases in the factor at the end of the arrow. Similarly, a ‘–‘ sign means that, all else equal, increases in the factor at the beginning of the arrow will result in decreases in the factor at the end of the arrow. Reinforcing loop polarity (denoted by ‘R’ in the loop identifier) indicates the existence of a self-reinforcing (also called ‘positive’) feedback process. Balancing loop polarity (denoted by ‘B’ in the loop identifier) indicates the existence of a balancing (also called ‘self-controlling’ or ‘negative’) feedback process. Finally, the arrow with a crossed bar indicates delayed feedback [39,40].
Fig. 3Trends in the number of casualties following interventions to alcohol marketing strategies at the Nan boat racing festival from 2006 to 2013 (dash line) and the Surin elephant round-up festival from 2008 to 2015 (solid line).