| Literature DB >> 36101527 |
Norhasniza Yaacob1, Ruzita Abd Talib1, Amirah Ismail2, Mohd Izwan Mahmud3.
Abstract
Background: Schools serve as a focal point in which to engage students and school communities, including teachers, parents and other healthcare providers (e.g. nutritionists), in implementing obesity interventions. Bringing them together is beneficial to ensuring healthy eating among schoolchildren and to creating healthy school environments. However, there are barriers and success factors related to the implementation of such an intervention. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the barriers and success factors to school-based obesity interventions to improve obesity implementation.Entities:
Keywords: barriers factors; case study; design technology; obesity module; success factors
Year: 2022 PMID: 36101527 PMCID: PMC9438862 DOI: 10.21315/mjms2022.29.4.10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malays J Med Sci ISSN: 1394-195X
Context of the case study (n = 12)
| Intervention programme | Context |
|---|---|
| Duration of the programme | 6-months |
| The total number of schools involved in the case study | 12 schools (2017–2019) |
| Types of school involved | Primary school |
| Intervention module | Using the current module designed by the Nutrition Department Kuala Lumpur |
| Component of the module | Five nutrition topics, one session on physical activity and healthy school canteen assessment |
| Programme coordinator/implementer | Nutrition officers, school administrators and selected teachers and PTA members |
| Target changes | i) Obese and overweight children 10 years old–11 years old of age |
Note: PTA = Parent-Teacher Association
Document analysis reviewed (n = 12)
| Type of document analysis explored involving schools ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| % | ||
| A) Reports on BMI and knowledge of obese and overweight children ( | A1: Boys | 202 | 54.7 |
| A2: Girls | 167 | 45.3 | |
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
| A3: Age (years old) boys | 10.62 | 0.49 | |
| A4: Age (years old) girls | 10.65 | 0.48 | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
| A1: Overall BMI z-score | 0.747 | ||
| A2: BMI z-score for girls | |||
| A3: BMI z-score for boys | 0.800 | ||
| A4: Knowledge on nutrition and physical activity | |||
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
| B) Reports on activities ( | B1: Involvement of parents during school-based activities | 3 | 25.0 |
| B2: Teachers need to reschedule the activities | 9 | 75.0 | |
| B3: Time constraint in conducting activities | 9 | 75.0 | |
| C) Records of compliance with healthy food and beverage sales in school canteens | C1: Compliance rate guideline during an intervention | 12 | 100 |
| C2: Compliance rate after intervention | 4 | 33.3 | |
| C3: Regular monitoring after intervention by schools/nutrition officers | 4 | 33.3 | |
Notes:
Significant based on P < 0.05 using paired t-test
Characteristics of the survey participants (n = 121)
| Teachers ( | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| Gender |
| % | Position |
| % | Position |
| % | |
| Male | 13 | 43.3 | Health teachers | 6 | 20.0 | Senior teachers | 5 | 16.7 | |
| Female | 17 | 56.7 | Canteen teachers | 7 | 23.3 | Classroom teachers | 6 | 20.0 | |
| Club and sport teachers | 6 | 20.0 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||||||
| Diploma in Education | 3 | 10.0 | < 5 years | 3 | 10.0 | < 5 years | 20 | 66.7 | |
| Degree in Education | 24 | 80.0 | 5 years–10 years | 1 | 3.3 | 5–10 years | 10 | 33.3 | |
| Master in Education | 3 | 10.0 | > 10 years | 26 | 86.7 | ||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Male | 3 | 23.1 | Secondary schools | 12 | 92.3 | < 5 years | 2 | 15.4 | |
| Female | 10 | 76.9 | Higher education | 1 | 7.7 | 5 years–10 years | 8 | 61.5 | |
| > 10 years | 3 | 23.1 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||
| Secondary schools | 38 | 48.7 | 34 | 43.6 | Public workers | 38 | 48.7 | 32 | 41.0 |
| Higher education | 40 | 51.3 | 44 | 56.4 | Private workers | 25 | 32.1 | 21 | 26.9 |
| Self-employed | 12 | 15.4 | 3 | 3.8 | |||||
| Unemployed | 3 | 3.8 | 22 | 28.2 | |||||
The perception among participants towards the effectiveness of the interventions and agreement on digitising the obesity module (n = 121)
| Item/Questions | Teachers ( | Canteen operators ( | Parents ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| i) Feedback on the effectiveness of the interventions from the participants’ perspective | 4.42 (0.47) | 3.14 (0.89) | 3.34 (0.96) |
| ii) Agreement on the requirement of digital obesity module | 4.42 (0.47) | 4.36 (0.55) | 4.23 (0.54) |
Note:
Lower mean was reported in two items
Identified barriers and success factors, and suggestions for the improvement of obesity interventions
| Empirical pattern | Theoretical pattern | ||
|
| |||
| Sub-theme | Theme | Verbatim | |
|
| |||
| Success factors | |||
|
Practical and hands-on activities Activities that interest the students Activities that meet the objectives Activities that increase students’ confidence | i) Nutritional approach used in the programme |
| Curriculum |
|
Support from administrators and coordinating teachers Teachers’ readiness and interest | ii) Teachers’ role | Policy | |
|
Active involvement of the PTA Technical support, materials, and inputs | iii) Strong collaboration with PTA members and agencies | Partnership | |
|
The commitment of school canteen operators Ongoing guidance from the teachers and nutrition officers Continuous monitoring | iv) Compliance with the healthy guidelines | Policy | |
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
Teachers time School rules | i) School system |
| Policy |
|
Lack of parental support and commitment Constraints in providing healthy meals | ii) Parental awareness |
| Partnership |
|
Lack of human resources Time-consuming | iii) Staff availability |
| Partnership |
|
Lack involvement in activities Unhealthy food habits | iv) Children’s compliance and attitudes | Policy (environment) | |
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
Teachers’ role Parents’ role The roles of school canteen operators The roles of nutritionist | i) Strengthening the role of school communities | Partnership | |
|
Interaction medium An easy-to-use reference sources Easily accessible reference sources | ii) Integrating nutrition education with technology for the school communities | ||
|
Integration of intervention components into the curriculum Integration of intervention components into the club activities | iii) Application of intervention elements in the schools’ curricula |
| Curiculum |
|
Agents of change in the family Agents of change to other students | iv) Students as role models | Partnership | |
Note:
PTA = Parent-Teacher Association
Figure 1Conceptual framework: summary findings of pattern matching from the interview, document analysis and survey data