Literature DB >> 15797902

Development of a collaborative model to improve school health promotion in The Netherlands.

Mariken T W Leurs1, Herman P Schaalma, Maria W J Jansen, Ingrid M Mur-Veeman, Lawrence H St Leger, Nanne de Vries.   

Abstract

In recent decades, school health promotion programs have been developing into whole-school health approaches. This has been accompanied by a greater understanding among health promoters of the core-business of schools, namely education, and how health promotion objectives can be integrated into this task. Evidence of the positive impact of school health promotion on health risk behavior of students is increasing. This article focuses on the processes and initial results of developing a collaborative model tailored for whole-school health in the Netherlands, named schoolBeat. The Dutch situation is characterized by fragmentation, a variety of health and welfare groups supporting schools, and a lack of sound integrated youth policies. A literature review, observations, and stakeholder consultation provided a clear picture of the current situation in school health promotion, and factors limiting a comprehensive and needs-based approach to school health. This revealed that a health promotion team within a school is fundamental to an effective approach to tailored school health promotion. A respected member of school staff should chair this team. To strengthen the link with the school care team, the school care coordinator should be a member of both teams. To provide coordinated support to all schools in a region, participating organizations decided to share advisory tasks. These tasks are included in the regular health promotion work of their staff. This means working with one advisor representing all school-health organizations per school, and using a comprehensive overview of possible support and projects promoting health. Empowering schools in needs assessments and comprehensive school health promotion is an important element of the developed approach. This article concludes with an examination of emerging issues in evaluating collaborative school health support during the first 18 months of development, and implementation and future perspectives regarding sustainable collaboration and quality improvement.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15797902     DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dai004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  12 in total

1.  Nutritional Knowledge and Practices, Lifestyle Characteristics and Anthropometric Status of Turks and Caicos Islands Elementary School Children.

Authors:  T E Maitland; S Malcolm; S Handfield
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 0.171

2.  School satisfaction and social relations: Swedish schoolchildren's improvement suggestions.

Authors:  Louise Persson; Katarina Haraldsson; Curt Hagquist
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Internet and game behaviour at a secondary school and a newly developed health promotion programme: a prospective study.

Authors:  J Rob J de Leeuw; Marieke de Bruijn; Gerdien H de Weert-van Oene; August J P Schrijvers
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Understanding of factors that enable health promoters in implementing health-promoting schools: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of qualitative evidence.

Authors:  Tommy Tsz Man Hung; Vico Chung Lim Chiang; Angela Dawson; Regina Lai Tong Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Healthy Primary School of the Future: A Contextual Action-Oriented Research Approach.

Authors:  Nina H M Bartelink; Patricia Van Assema; Maria W J Jansen; Hans H C M Savelberg; Maartje Willeboordse; Stef P J Kremers
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Process evaluation of the healthy primary School of the Future: the key learning points.

Authors:  N H M Bartelink; P van Assema; M W J Jansen; H H C M Savelberg; G F Moore; J Hawkins; S P J Kremers
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  The Moderating Role of the School Context on the Effects of the Healthy Primary School of the Future.

Authors:  Nina Bartelink; Patricia van Assema; Maria Jansen; Hans Savelberg; Stef Kremers
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Diagnosis of sustainable collaboration in health promotion - a case study.

Authors:  Mariken T W Leurs; Ingrid M Mur-Veeman; Rosalie van der Sar; Herman P Schaalma; Nanne K de Vries
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Lessons from the past: integrated prevention is successful.

Authors:  Guus Schrijvers
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 5.120

10.  Do email and mobile phone prompts stimulate primary school children to reuse an Internet-delivered smoking prevention intervention?

Authors:  Henricus-Paul Cremers; Liesbeth Mercken; Rik Crutzen; Paul Willems; Hein de Vries; Anke Oenema
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.