| Literature DB >> 36101462 |
Ahmed M Ammar1, Marwa I Abd El-Hamid1, Yousreya H Mohamed2, Heba M Mohamed1, Dalal H M Al-Khalifah3, Wael N Hozzein4, Samy Selim5, Wafaa M El-Neshwy6, Rania M S El-Malt7.
Abstract
Among many bovine Mycoplasma species (spp.), Mycoplasma bovis is recognized as a significant causative agent of respiratory diseases in cattle. In recent years, resistant M. bovis isolates, especially to fluoroquinolones, have been reported globally as a result of the extensive usage of antimicrobials in the treatment of bovine pneumonia. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bovine Mycoplasma spp. isolated from the respiratory tracts of cattle in Egypt and to assess the fluoroquinolones resistance in the recovered mycoplasma isolates via broth microdilution and conventional PCR techniques. Conventional phenotypic methods identified 128 mycoplasma isolates (32%) from 400 different samples, with M. bovis being the predominant spp. (61%), followed by M. bovirhinis (15%). Of note, mycoplasma isolates were rarely isolated from total healthy lung tissues (7/55, 12.7%), but they were frequently isolated from pneumonic lungs (31/45, 68.9%). All the examined mycoplasma isolates (n = 76) were sensitive to tilmicosin, tylosin, tulathromycin, spiramycin, and spectinomycin (100% each), while 60.5% and 43.4% of the examined isolates had high minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values to enrofloxacin and doxycycline, respectively. Three and two mycoplasma isolates with high enrofloxacin MICs were confirmed to be M. bovis and M. bovirhinis, respectively, by PCR assays. All molecularly confirmed mycoplasma isolates (n = 5) were positive for the gyrA gene (100%); meanwhile, three isolates (60%) were positive for the parC gene. In conclusion, our findings revealed alarming resistance to enrofloxacin and doxycycline antibiotics; thus, antimicrobial usage must be restricted and molecular techniques can help in the rapid detection of the resistant strains.Entities:
Keywords: Mycoplasm bovis; cattle; fluoroquinolone resistance; gyrA; parC
Year: 2022 PMID: 36101462 PMCID: PMC9312167 DOI: 10.3390/biology11071083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
Distribution of different samples collected from apparently healthy and diseased cattle in Sharkia Governorate, Egypt.
| Sample Type (Symbol) | Animal Health Condition | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apparently Healthy ( | Diseased ( | ||||
| Calve | Adult Cattle | Calve | Adult Cattle | ||
| Nasal swab (Ns) | 30 | 25 | 25 | 20 | 100 |
| Tracheal swab (Ts) | 30 | 25 | 25 | 20 | 100 |
| Lung tissue (Lt) | 30 | 25 | 25 | 20 | 100 |
| Tracheal tissue (Tt) | 30 | 25 | 25 | 20 | 100 |
| Total | 120 | 100 | 100 | 80 | 400 |
Interpretative minimum inhibitory concentrations’ breakpoints of different antimicrobial agents against Mycoplasma species.
| Antimicrobial Class | Antimicrobial Agent (Symbol) | MIC Breakpoint (µg/mL) | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitive | Intermediate Sensitive | Resistant | |||
| Fluroquinolones | Enrofloxacin (ENR) | ≤0.25 | 0.5−1 | ≥2 | [ |
| Macrolides | Tulathromycin (TUL) | ≤16 | 32 | ≥64 | [ |
| Tilmicosin (TIL) | ≤8 | 16 | ≥32 | [ | |
| Tylosin (TYL) | ≤8 | - | ≥16 | [ | |
| Spiramycin (SP) | ≤2−8 | - | >8 | ||
| Tetracyclines | Doxycycline (DO) | ≤1 | 2−4 | ≥8 | |
| Aminoglycosides | Spectinomycin (SPT) | ≤32 | 64 | ≥128 | [ |
| Phenicols | Florfenicol (FF) | ≤2 | 4 | ≥8 | |
Sequence of oligonucleotide primers and amplified PCR products for five target genes of Mycoplasma species.
| Specificity | Primer Sequence (5′-3′) | PCR Amplified Product (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | F: AGACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA | 1000 | [ |
|
| F: CCTTTTAGATTGGGATAGCGGATG | 360 | [ |
| F: GCTGATAGAGAGGTCTATCG | 316 | [ | |
| QRDRs | F: GACGAATCATCTAGCGAG | 531 | [ |
| QRDRs | F: GAGCAACAGTTAAACGATTTG | 488 | [ |
QRDRs: Quinolone resistance determining region, bp: base pair.
Prevalence of bovine Mycoplasma species in various samples at Sharkia Governorate, Egypt.
| Sample Type | ** Total No. of Mycoplasma Isolates from Various Samples of Investigated Animals (%) | Total * | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diseased Calves | Diseased Cattle | Apparently Healthy Calves | Apparently Healthy Cattle | ||
| Nasal swab (Ns, 100) | 12 (48) | 8 (40) | 9 (30) | 6 (24) | 35 (35) |
| Tracheal swab (Ts, 100) | 10 (40) | 5 (25) | 8 (26.7) | 4 (16) | 27 (27) |
| Lung tissue (Lt, 100) | 19 (76) | 12 (60) | 7 (23.3) | 0 (0) | 38 (38) |
| Tracheal tissue (Tt, 100) | 11 (44) | 4 (20) | 8 (26.7) | 5 (20) | 28 (28) |
| * Total (400) | 52 (52) | 29 (36.3) | 32 (26.7) | 15 (15) | 128 (32) |
* The isolation rates were calculated concerning the total number of the examined samples from each source and each animal. ** The isolation rates were calculated concerning the number of the samples from each animal.
Figure 1Prevalence of M. bovis and M. bovirhinis isolates in various samples’ sources (A) and types (B). Ns: nasal swabs, Ts: tracheal swabs, Lt: lung tissues; Tt: tracheal tissues, * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, ns: non-significant.
Minimal inhibitory concentrations of the tested antimicrobials against mycoplasma isolates.
| Antimicrobial Class | Antimicrobial Agent (Symbol) | No. of Mycoplasma Isolates Showing MIC Values of the Tested Antimicrobials (μg/mL) * | MIC50 | MIC90 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0078 | 0.0156 | 0.0312 | 0.0625 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | ||||
| Fluoroquinolones | Enrofloxacin (ENR) | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 10 | 15 | 41 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Macrolides | Tulathromycin (TUL) | - | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 14 | 16 | 24 | - | - | - | 0.5 | 1 |
| Tilmicosin (TIL) | 13 | 29 | 27 | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.0156 | 0.0312 | |
| Tylosin (TYL) | - | - | - | - | 17 | 18 | 22 | 16 | 3 | - | 0.5 | 1 | ||
| Spiramycin (SP) | - | - | 37 | 3 | 36 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.0625 | 0.125 | |
| Tetracyclines | Doxycycline (DO) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 3 | 35 | 33 | 4 | 8 |
| Aminoglycosides | Spectinomycin (SPT) | - | 6 | 6 | - | - | - | 10 | 12 | 28 | 14 | - | 2 | 4 |
| Phenicols | Florfenicol (FF) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | 26 | 17 | 27 | - | 2 | 4 |
* The dark vertical lines denote the resistance breakpoint, MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration, MIC50 = (n × 0.5), MIC90 = (n × 0.9).
Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of total mycoplasma, Mycoplasma bovis, and Mycoplasma bovirhinis isolates.
| No. of | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antimicrobial Class | Antimicrobial Agent (Symbol) | Total Mycoplasma Isolates | ||||||||
| R | I | S | R | I | S | R | I | S | ||
| Fluoroquinolones | Enrofloxacin (ENR) | 41 (67.2) | 20 | - | 5 | 10 | - | 46 | 30 | - |
| Macrolides | Tulathromycin (TUL) | - | - | 61 (100) | - | - | 15 | - | - | 76 |
| Tilmicosin (TIL) | - | - | 61 (100) | - | - | 15 | - | - | 76 | |
| Tylosin (TYL) | - | - | 61 | - | - | 15 | - | - | 76 | |
| Spiramycin (SP) | - | - | 61 | - | - | 15 | - | - | 76 | |
| Tetracyclines | Doxycycline (DO) | 33 (54.1) | 28 | - | - | 10 | 5 | 33 | 38 | 5 |
| Aminoglycosides | Spectinomycin (SPT) | - | - | 61 | - | - | 15 | - | - | 76 |
| Phenicols | Florfenicol (FF) | - | 21 | 40 | - | 10 | 5 | - | 31 | 45 |
R: resistant, I: intermediate sensitive, S: sensitive.
Figure 2Prevalence rates of enrofloxacin and doxycycline among mycoplasma isolates from different samples’ sources. Ns: nasal swabs, Ts: tracheal swabs, Lt: lung tissue, Tt: tracheal tissue, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3Prevalence of molecularly identified Mycoplasma species in the collected samples from different sources. The prevalence rate for each species was calculated regarding the total number of the examined samples from different sources. ns: non-significant, Lt: lung tissue, Tt: tracheal tissue.
Figure 4Prevalence of gyrA and parC genes in two bovine Mycoplasma species (A) and mycoplasma isolates from different samples’ sources (B). Lt: lung tissue, Tt: tracheal tissue, QRDRs: quinolone resistance-determining regions, ns: non-significant.