Literature DB >> 36099300

Homologous recombination-deficient mutation cluster in tumor suppressor RAD51C identified by comprehensive analysis of cancer variants.

Rohit Prakash1, Yashpal Rawal2, Meghan R Sullivan3, McKenzie K Grundy3, Hélène Bret4, Michael J Mihalevic3, Hayley L Rein3, Jared M Baird3, Kristie Darrah3, Fang Zhang1,5, Raymond Wang1, Tiffany A Traina6, Marc R Radke7, Scott H Kaufmann8, Elizabeth M Swisher7, Raphaël Guérois4, Mauro Modesti9, Patrick Sung2, Maria Jasin1, Kara A Bernstein3.   

Abstract

Mutations in homologous recombination (HR) genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, and the RAD51 paralog RAD51C, predispose to tumorigenesis and sensitize cancers to DNA-damaging agents and poly(ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors. However, ∼800 missense variants of unknown significance have been identified for RAD51C alone, impairing cancer risk assessment and therapeutic strategies. Here, we interrogated >50 RAD51C missense variants, finding that mutations in residues conserved with RAD51 strongly predicted HR deficiency and disrupted interactions with other RAD51 paralogs. A cluster of mutations was identified in and around the Walker A box that led to impairments in HR, interactions with three other RAD51 paralogs, binding to single-stranded DNA, and ATP hydrolysis. We generated structural models of the two RAD51 paralog complexes containing RAD51C, RAD51B-RAD51C-RAD51D-XRCC2 and RAD51C-XRCC3. Together with our functional and biochemical analyses, the structural models predict ATP binding at the interface of RAD51C interactions with other RAD51 paralogs, similar to interactions between monomers in RAD51 filaments, and explain the failure of RAD51C variants in binding multiple paralogs. Ovarian cancer patients with variants in this cluster showed exceptionally long survival, which may be relevant to the reversion potential of the variants. This comprehensive analysis provides a framework for RAD51C variant classification. Importantly, it also provides insight into the functioning of the RAD51 paralog complexes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA repair; Homologous recombination; RAD51 paralog; RAD51C; Variants of unknown significance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36099300      PMCID: PMC9499524          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2202727119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  52 in total

1.  Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal.

Authors:  Jianjiong Gao; Bülent Arman Aksoy; Ugur Dogrusoz; Gideon Dresdner; Benjamin Gross; S Onur Sumer; Yichao Sun; Anders Jacobsen; Rileen Sinha; Erik Larsson; Ethan Cerami; Chris Sander; Nikolaus Schultz
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 8.192

2.  Yeast Rad55 and Rad57 proteins form a heterodimer that functions with replication protein A to promote DNA strand exchange by Rad51 recombinase.

Authors:  P Sung
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  PARP inhibitors: Synthetic lethality in the clinic.

Authors:  Christopher J Lord; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all.

Authors:  Milot Mirdita; Sergey Ovchinnikov; Martin Steinegger; Konstantin Schütze; Yoshitaka Moriwaki; Lim Heo
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 47.990

5.  Frequency of Germline Mutations in 25 Cancer Susceptibility Genes in a Sequential Series of Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nadine Tung; Nancy U Lin; John Kidd; Brian A Allen; Nanda Singh; Richard J Wenstrup; Anne-Renee Hartman; Eric P Winer; Judy E Garber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Identification of functional domains in the RAD51L2 (RAD51C) protein and its requirement for gene conversion.

Authors:  Catherine A French; Cathryn E Tambini; John Thacker
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Mutations in Homologous Recombination Genes and Outcomes in Ovarian Carcinoma Patients in GOG 218: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  Michael J Birrer; Elizabeth M Swisher; Barbara M Norquist; Mark F Brady; Maria I Harrell; Tom Walsh; Ming K Lee; Suleyman Gulsuner; Sarah S Bernards; Silvia Casadei; Robert A Burger; Krishnansu S Tewari; Floor Backes; Robert S Mannel; Gretchen Glaser; Cheryl Bailey; Stephen Rubin; John Soper; Heather A Lankes; Nilsa C Ramirez; Mary Claire King
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data.

Authors:  Ethan Cerami; Jianjiong Gao; Ugur Dogrusoz; Benjamin E Gross; Selcuk Onur Sumer; Bülent Arman Aksoy; Anders Jacobsen; Caitlin J Byrne; Michael L Heuer; Erik Larsson; Yevgeniy Antipin; Boris Reva; Arthur P Goldberg; Chris Sander; Nikolaus Schultz
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 39.397

9.  BRCA2 suppresses replication stress-induced mitotic and G1 abnormalities through homologous recombination.

Authors:  Weiran Feng; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold.

Authors:  John Jumper; Richard Evans; Alexander Pritzel; Tim Green; Michael Figurnov; Olaf Ronneberger; Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool; Russ Bates; Augustin Žídek; Anna Potapenko; Alex Bridgland; Clemens Meyer; Simon A A Kohl; Andrew J Ballard; Andrew Cowie; Bernardino Romera-Paredes; Stanislav Nikolov; Rishub Jain; Demis Hassabis; Jonas Adler; Trevor Back; Stig Petersen; David Reiman; Ellen Clancy; Michal Zielinski; Martin Steinegger; Michalina Pacholska; Tamas Berghammer; Sebastian Bodenstein; David Silver; Oriol Vinyals; Andrew W Senior; Koray Kavukcuoglu; Pushmeet Kohli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.