Literature DB >> 16155075

Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF.

E B Baart1, E Martini, I van den Berg, N S Macklon, R-J H Galjaard, B C J M Fauser, D Van Opstal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In order to assess the frequency of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos obtained from IVF patients aged <38 years, preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) was performed after biopsy of two blastomeres. Furthermore, the reliability of this diagnosis was assessed by performing reanalysis of the embryo on day 5.
METHOD: The copy numbers of 10 chromosomes (1, 7, 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y) were investigated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Embryos that were found to be abnormal or of insufficient morphological quality were cultured until day 5 and reanalysed. Results obtained were compared to the day 3 blastomere analysis.
RESULTS: After analysis of 196 embryos (one cell in 38% and two cells in 62%), only 36% of the embryos were found to be normal on day 3. After analysis of two blastomeres, 50% showed chromosomal mosaicism. Comparison of the FISH results from day 3 blastomeres and day 5 embryos yielded an overall cytogenetic confirmation rate of 54%.
CONCLUSIONS: The rates of mosaicism and aneuploidy in these embryos from young IVF patients are similar to those published for older women. We found the best confirmation rate after a diagnosis based on two cells, where both blastomeres showed the same chromosomal abnormality. In contrast, after a mosaic diagnosis the confirmation rate was low. The present study provides the first detailed reanalysis data of embryos analysed by PGS and clearly demonstrates the impact of mosaicism on the reliability of the PGS diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16155075     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  70 in total

1.  Discordance among blastomeres renders preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ineffective.

Authors:  C B Coulam; R S Jeyendran; M Fiddler; E Pergament
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Chaos in the embryo.

Authors:  David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  Evelyne Vanneste; Thierry Voet; Cédric Le Caignec; Michèle Ampe; Peter Konings; Cindy Melotte; Sophie Debrock; Mustapha Amyere; Miikka Vikkula; Frans Schuit; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Geert Verbeke; Thomas D'Hooghe; Yves Moreau; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Polar body diagnosis - a step in the right direction?

Authors:  Katrin van der Ven; Markus Montag; Hans van der Ven
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Early embryo mortality in natural human reproduction: What the data say.

Authors:  Gavin E Jarvis
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-11-25

7.  Comprehensive analysis of karyotypic mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass.

Authors:  D S Johnson; C Cinnioglu; R Ross; A Filby; G Gemelos; M Hill; A Ryan; D Smotrich; M Rabinowitz; M J Murray
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 8.  Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility.

Authors:  P Devroey; B C J M Fauser; K Diedrich
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol.

Authors:  D S Johnson; G Gemelos; J Baner; A Ryan; C Cinnioglu; M Banjevic; R Ross; M Alper; B Barrett; J Frederick; D Potter; B Behr; M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach!

Authors:  Joep Geraedts; John Collins; Luca Gianaroli; Veerle Goossens; Alan Handyside; Joyce Harper; Markus Montag; Sjoerd Repping; Andreas Schmutzler
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.