Literature DB >> 36096957

Influence of obesity on incidence of thrombosis and disease severity in patients with COVID-19: From the CLOT-COVID study.

Yoshito Ogihara1, Sen Yachi2, Makoto Takeyama2, Yuji Nishimoto3, Ichizo Tsujino4, Junichi Nakamura4, Naoto Yamamoto5, Hiroko Nakata6, Satoshi Ikeda7, Michihisa Umetsu8, Shizu Aikawa9, Hiroya Hayashi10, Hirono Satokawa11, Yoshinori Okuno12, Eriko Iwata13, Nobutaka Ikeda14, Akane Kondo15, Takehisa Iwai16, Norikazu Yamada17, Tomohiro Ogawa18, Takao Kobayashi5, Makoto Mo19, Yugo Yamashita12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The influence of obesity on the development of thrombosis and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unclear.
METHOD: The CLOT-COVID study was a retrospective multicenter cohort study enrolling 2894 consecutive hospitalized patients with COVID-19 between April 2021 and September 2021 among 16 centers in Japan. The present study consisted of 2690 patients aged over 18 years with available body mass index (BMI), who were divided into an obesity group (BMI ≥30) (N = 457) and a non-obesity group (BMI <30) (N = 2233).
RESULTS: The obesity group showed more severe status of COVID-19 at admission compared with the non-obesity group. The incidence of thrombosis was not significantly different between the groups (obesity group: 2.6 % versus non-obesity group: 1.9 %, p = 0.39), while the incidence of a composite outcome of all-cause death, or requirement of mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during hospitalization was significantly higher in the obesity group (20.1 % versus 15.0 %, p < 0.01). After adjusting confounders in the multivariable logistic regression model, the risk of obesity relative to non-obesity for thrombosis was not significant (adjusted OR, 1.39; 95 % CI, 0.68-2.84, p = 0.37), while the adjusted risk of obesity relative to non-obesity for the composite outcome was significant (adjusted OR, 1.85; 95 % CI, 1.39-2.47, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In the present large-scale observational study, obesity was not significantly associated with the development of thrombosis during hospitalization; however, it was associated with severity of COVID-19.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronavirus disease 2019; Obesity; Severity; Thrombosis

Year:  2022        PMID: 36096957      PMCID: PMC9420713          DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol        ISSN: 0914-5087            Impact factor:   2.974


Introduction

A large proportion of patients that develop coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have asymptomatic or mild symptoms; however, some patients present with respiratory failure and hemodynamic instability, requiring admission to an intensive care unit and advanced respiratory support, sometimes leading to multiple organ failure and death [1], [2], [3], [4]. In addition, COVID-19 often causes coagulopathy, especially in severe COVID-19, which leads to thromboembolic complications, especially venous thromboembolism (VTE) [5], [6], [7]. Therefore, it is important to identify risk factors of thrombosis and worsening of COVID-19 severity, and to conduct prophylactic anticoagulation therapy and aggressive anti-virus therapy suitable for patients classified as high risk. Obesity is a well-known independent risk factor of VTE for medical hospitalized patients [8], [9]. In addition, obesity is associated with requirement of respiratory support under intubation and development of acute respiratory distress syndrome and other respiratory failure [10]. Thus, in COVID-19, obesity may lead to increased risks of development of thrombosis and worsening of COVID-19 severity. Previous studies have reported an association between obesity and worsening of COVID-19 severity [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. However, the impact of obesity on thrombosis has not been fully evaluated. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare patient characteristics and clinical outcomes between obese and non-obese patients and evaluate the impact of obesity on thrombosis and the severity of COVID-19 using data from a large-scale multicenter observational study in Japan.

Methods

Study Design and Study Population. The CLOT-COVID Study (thrombosis and antiCoaguLatiOn Therapy in patients with COVID-19 in Japan Study: UMIN000045800) was a physician-initiated, retrospective, multicenter cohort study involving consecutive hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from 16 centers in Japan between April 2021 and September 2021. The design of the study was previously reported in detail [18]. A total of 2894 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 using a positive polymerase chain reaction test were enrolled through the hospital databases. The present study population consisted of 2690 adult patients with available body mass index (BMI) data after excluding 138 patients without height or body weight recorded at admission and 66 patients below the age of 18 years. Obesity was defined as 30 kg/m2 ≤ BMI according to World Health Organization criteria [19]. The entire population was divided into an obesity group and a non-obesity group (Fig. 1 ).
Fig. 1

Study flow chart.

COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; BMI, body mass index.

Study flow chart. COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; BMI, body mass index. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The research protocol was approved by the relevant review boards or ethics committees at all participating centers. We obtained informed consent in the form of an opt-out on each hospital's website due to the use of clinical information obtained during routine clinical practices. This study is concordant with the guidelines for epidemiological studies issued by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare in Japan. Data Collection and definitions for patient characteristics. We collected the patients' data, clinical management, and follow-up information from the hospital charts or hospital databases according to the pre-specified definitions. The physicians at each institution entered the data entry into an electronic case report form. In addition, data were manually checked at the general office for missing or contradictory input and values out of the expected range. We defined patients who did not require oxygen as mild COVID-19, those who required oxygen as moderate COVID-19, and those who required mechanical ventilation (MV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as severe COVID-19 [18], [20], [21]. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis managements were defined as the usage of any anticoagulants except for their usage for the treatment of thrombosis. The definitions of other diseases are described in Online Appendix 1. Clinical outcomes. The primary outcome in the present study was thrombosis during the hospitalization. Thrombosis included VTE, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and systemic arterial thromboembolism. VTE was defined as pulmonary embolism and/or deep vein thrombosis objectively confirmed by imaging examinations (ultrasound, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, pulmonary angiography, contrast venography, or ventilation/perfusion lung scintigraphy) or by autopsy. Ischemic stroke was defined as stroke either requiring or prolonging the hospitalization with symptoms lasting >24 h. Myocardial infarction was defined according to the universal myocardial infarction guidelines [22]. The secondary outcome measures were VTE alone, major bleeding, all-cause death, and a composite outcome of all-cause death or requirement of MV or ECMO during hospitalization. Major bleeding was defined using International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major definition [23].

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages. Continuous values were presented as the mean and standard deviation for parametric data or as the median and interquartile range for nonparametric data. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square test, as appropriate; otherwise, Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test or Wilcoxon's rank-sum test based on the normality of distribution. The clinical outcomes were presented as numbers of events and percentages with the 95 % confidence intervals (CI). The incidence of thrombosis was assessed by stratified analysis according to severity of COVID-19 at admission. To adjust for possible confounding factors, a multivariable logistic regression model was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and the 95 % CI of obesity with a reference of non-obesity for development of thrombosis and a composite outcome of all-cause death, or requirement of MV or ECMO. Based on previous reports [5], [8], [12], [14], [24], [25] and clinical relevance, we selected 5 risk-adjusting variables of baseline characteristics (age, sex, D dimer levels at admission >1.0 μg/ml, severity of COVID-19 at admission, and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis) for thrombosis and VTE alone, and 7 risk-adjusting variables of baseline characteristics (age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, respiratory disease, active cancer) for the composite outcome. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP version 13.0.0 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). All reported p-values were 2-tailed, and statistical significance was set at a p-value <0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics at admission. In the entire study population, the median BMI was 24.7 (21.7, 28.1) kg/m2. The obesity group and the non-obesity group accounted for 457 patients (17 %) and 2233 patients (83 %), respectively. In detail, there were 146 patients (5.4 %) with BMI <18.5 kg/m2, 1288 patients (47.9 %) with 18.5 ≤ BMI <25 kg/m2, 799 patients (29.7 %) with 25 ≤ BMI <30 kg/m2, 321 patients (11.9 %) with 30 ≤ BMI <35 kg/m2, 89 patients (3.3 %) with 35 ≤ BMI <40 kg/m2, and 47 patients (1.7 %) with 40 kg/m2 < BMI (Fig. 2 ). Median BMI in the obesity and non-obesity groups was 32.9 (31.0, 35.7) kg/m2 and 23.8 (21.3, 26.2) kg/m2, respectively.
Fig. 2

Distribution of body mass index in the entire population.

BMI, body mass index.

Distribution of body mass index in the entire population. BMI, body mass index. The obesity group was younger than the non-obesity group (47 years versus 55 years, p < 0.01); however, there was no significant difference in sex or D-dimer levels at admission between the two groups (Table 1 ). The obesity group showed higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus than the non-obesity group; however, there was no significant difference in lung disease and history of VTE or bleeding between the two groups. The obesity group had more severe status of COVID-19 at admission than the non-obesity group (mild: 54 % versus 60 %, moderate: 36 % versus 32 %, and severe: 11 % versus 7.9 %, p = 0.02) (Table 1).
Table 1

Patient characteristics and management strategies during hospitalization.

TotalN=2690Obesity group(BMI ≥30)N=457Non-obesity group(BMI <30)N=2233p-value
Baseline characteristics
Age (years)54 ± 1647 ± 1355 ± 17<0.01
Male1759 (84 %)304 (67 %)1455 (65 %)0.58
Body weight (kg)69.9 ± 17.594.9 ± 16.364.8 ± 12.7<0.01
Height (cm)165.2 ± 9.5166.3 ± 9.5165.0 ± 9.50.01
Body mass index (kg/m2)24.7 (21.7–28.1)32.9 (31.0–35.7)23.8 (21.3–26.1)<0.01
D-dimer level at admission (μg/mL) (N = 2615)0.8 (0.5–1.3)0.8 (0.5–1.2)0.8 (0.5–1.3)0.13
Comorbidities
Hypertension833 (31 %)184 (40 %)649 (29 %)<0.01
Diabetes mellitus567 (21 %)157 (34 %)410 (18 %)<0.01
Heart disease234 (8.7 %)28 (6.1 %)206 (9.2 %)0.03
Respiratory disease276 (10 %)50 (11 %)226 (10 %)0.60
Active cancer57 (2.1 %)1 (0.2 %)56 (2.5 %)<0.01
History of major bleeding27 (1.0 %)3 (0.7 %)24 (1.1 %)0.60
History of VTE15 (0.6 %)3 (0.7 %)12 (0.5 %)0.73
Severity of COVID-19 at admission
Mild1584 (59 %)245 (54 %)1339 (60 %)0.02
Moderate (Need oxygen)880 (33 %)163 (36 %)717 (32 %)
Severe (Need mechanical ventilation /ECMO)226 (8.4 %)49 (11 %)177 (7.9 %)
Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis during hospitalization
Anticoagulants1190 (44 %)250 (55 %)940 (42 %)<0.01
Prophylactic dose of unfractionated heparin647/1190 (54 %)139/250 (56 %)508/940 (54 %)0.48
Therapeutic dose of unfractionated heparin155/1190 (13 %)27/250 (11 %)128/940 (14 %)
Prophylactic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin197/1190 (17 %)33/250 (13 %)164/940 (17 %)
Therapeutic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin0/1190 (0 %)0/250 (0 %)0/940 (0 %)
Direct oral anticoagulants162/1190 (14 %)46/250 (18 %)116/940 (12 %)
Warfarin17/1190 (1.4 %)2/250 (0.8 %)15/940 (1.6 %)
Others12/1190 (1.0 %)3/250 (1.2 %)9/940 (1.0 %)
Imaging examinations during hospitalization
Ultrasound examination of the lower extremities37 (1.4 %)8 (1.8 %)29 (1.3 %)0.57
Contrast-enhanced CT examination121 (4.5 %)20 (4.4 %)101 (4.5 %)0.89

Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages, and continuous variables are presented as the mean and standard deviation or the median and interquartile range based on their distributions. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test when appropriate; otherwise, Fisher's exact test was used. Continuous variables were compared using the Student's t-test or Wilcoxon's rank sum test based on distribution.

BMI, body mass index; VTE, venous thromboembolism; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; CT, computed tomography.

Patient characteristics and management strategies during hospitalization. Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages, and continuous variables are presented as the mean and standard deviation or the median and interquartile range based on their distributions. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test when appropriate; otherwise, Fisher's exact test was used. Continuous variables were compared using the Student's t-test or Wilcoxon's rank sum test based on distribution. BMI, body mass index; VTE, venous thromboembolism; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; CT, computed tomography. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis management and imaging examinations. The obesity group more often received pharmacological thromboprophylaxis than the non-obesity group (55 % versus 42 %, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in ultrasound examination of the lower extremities and contrast-enhanced computed tomography examination during hospitalization between the two groups (Table 1). Clinical outcomes during hospitalization. The incidence of thrombosis during hospitalization was 2.0 %, in which the most frequent thrombosis was VTE (72 %). Both groups showed an increased incidence of thrombosis in the patients with increased severity of COVID-19 (Fig. 3 ); however, the difference between the groups was not significant [obesity group: 2.6 % (1.5–4.5 %) versus non-obesity group: 1.9 % (1.4–2.5 %), p = 0.39]. There was also no significant difference in the incidence of VTE alone between the groups [obesity group: 2.2 % (1.2–4.0 %) versus non-obesity group: 1.3 % (0.9–1.9 %), p = 0.15]. Similarly, the incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different [2.4 % (1.3–4.3 %) versus 2.0 % (1.5–2.7 %), p = 0.59] (Table 2 ). On the other hand, there was a significant difference in the incidence of the composite outcomes of all-cause death or requirement of MV or ECMO during hospitalization (obesity group: 20 % versus non-obesity group: 15 %, p < 0.01); however, there was no significant difference in the incidence of all-cause death (4.4 % versus 5.6 %, p = 0.29).
Fig. 3

Incidence of thrombosis comparing obesity and non-obesity group according to the severity of COVID-19 at admission.

COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019.

Table 2

Clinical outcomes during hospitalization.

TotalN=2690Obesity group(BMI ≥30)N=457Non-obesity group(BMI <30)N=2233p-value
Thrombosis54 (2.0 % [1.5–2.6 %])12 (2.6 % [1.5–4.5 %])42 (1.9 % [1.4–2.5 %])0.39
VTE39 (1.5 % [1.1–2.0 %])10 (2.2 % [1.2–4.0 %])29 (1.3 % [0.9–1.9 %])0.15
Arterial thrombotic events12 (0.4 % [0.3–0.8 %])2 (0.4 % [0.1–1.6 %])10 (0.4 % [0.2–0.8 %])
Ischemic stroke9/12 (75 %)1/2 (50 %)8/10 (80 %)
Myocardial infarction2/12 (17 %)1/2 (50 %)1/10 (10 %)
Systemic arterial thromboembolism1/12 (8 %)0/2 (0 %)1/10 (10 %)
Other thrombosis6 (0.2 % [0.1–0.5 %])0 (0.0 % [0.0–0.8 %])6 (0.2 % [0.1–0.6 %])-
Major bleeding56 (2.1 % [1.6–2.7 %])11 (2.4 % [1.3–4.3 %])45 (2.0 % [1.5–2.7 %]0.59
All-cause death145 (5.4 % [4.6–6.3 %])20 (4.4 % [2.9–6.7 %])125 (5.6 % [4.7–6.6 %])0.29
All-cause death, or need MV or ECMO during hospitalization426 (15.8 % [14.5–17.3 %])92 (20.1 % [16.7–24.0 %])334 (15.0 % [13.5–16.5 %])<0.01

Clinical outcomes are presented as numbers of events and percentages with the 95 % confidence intervals, which were compared using the chi-squared test when appropriate; otherwise, Fisher's exact test was used.

BMI, body mass index; VTE, venous thromboembolism; MV, mechanical ventilation; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Incidence of thrombosis comparing obesity and non-obesity group according to the severity of COVID-19 at admission. COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019. Clinical outcomes during hospitalization. Clinical outcomes are presented as numbers of events and percentages with the 95 % confidence intervals, which were compared using the chi-squared test when appropriate; otherwise, Fisher's exact test was used. BMI, body mass index; VTE, venous thromboembolism; MV, mechanical ventilation; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. After adjusting confounders in the multivariable logistic regression model, the risk of obesity relative to non-obesity for thrombosis remained insignificant (adjusted OR, 1.39; 95 % CI, 0.68–2.84, p = 0.37) (Table 3 ). Similarly, the risk of obesity relative to non-obesity for VTE alone was insignificant (adjusted OR, 1.47; 95 % CI, 0.66–3.27, p = 0.35). On the other hand, the adjusted risk of obesity relative to non-obesity for the composite outcome during the hospitalization was still significant (adjusted OR, 1.85; 95 % CI, 1.39–2.47, p < 0.01).
Table 3

Crude and adjusted clinical outcomes.


Non-obesity group(BMI <30)(Reference)N=2233

Obesity group(BMI ≥30)N=457
Numbers of events during hospitalization(percentages)Numbers of events during hospitalization(percentages)Crude OR(95 % CI)p-valueAdjusted OR(95 % CI)p-value
Thrombosis42 (1.9 %)12 (2.6 %)1.41 (0.73–2.69)0.301.39 (0.68–2.84)0.37
All-cause death, or need MV or ECMO during hospitalization334 (15.0 %)92 (20.1 %)1.43 (1.11–1.85)<0.011.85 (1.39–2.47)<0.01

Crude and adjusted ORs and 95 % CIs were estimated by the multivariable logistic regression model using non-obesity group as the reference. We selected 5 risk-adjusting variables of baseline characteristics (age, sex, D dimer levels at admission >1.0 μg/ml, severity of COVID-19 at admission, and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis) for thrombosis, and 7 risk-adjusting variables of baseline characteristics (age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, respiratory disease, active cancer) for the composite outcome.

BMI, body mass index; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; MV, mechanical ventilation; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Crude and adjusted clinical outcomes. Crude and adjusted ORs and 95 % CIs were estimated by the multivariable logistic regression model using non-obesity group as the reference. We selected 5 risk-adjusting variables of baseline characteristics (age, sex, D dimer levels at admission >1.0 μg/ml, severity of COVID-19 at admission, and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis) for thrombosis, and 7 risk-adjusting variables of baseline characteristics (age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, respiratory disease, active cancer) for the composite outcome. BMI, body mass index; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; MV, mechanical ventilation; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Discussion

The main findings of the present study were as follows: 1) obesity was associated with severe status of COVID-19 during hospitalization; and 2) there was not a statistically significant difference in the incidence of VTE between the groups. Consistent with a lot of previous reports [1], [11], [12], [14], [16], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], the present study identified that obesity was independently associated with severe status of COVID-19 during hospitalization. Obesity may lead to an impaired immune system and reduced respiratory function [10], [34]. Gene expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor, a cellular receptor for the virus, is up-regulated in adipose tissue in patients with obesity, which may facilitate the entry of the virus into cells [35]. The underlying mechanism may account for obesity causing disease progression in COVID-19 patients. There was consistency between our observation with a large dataset from Japan and previous studies; however, the risk of worsening of COVID-19 may vary according to differences in race or ethnicity, resource availability in each country, and different virus variants; thus, caution should be taken in generalizing these results. Several previous reports suggested obesity led to an increased risk of thrombosis associated with COVID-19 [21], [25], [36], but the issue remains controversial. Hendren et al. reported that class II obesity (35 ≤ BMI < 40 kg/m2) increased with the risk of VTE, but class I (30 ≤ BMI < 35 kg/m2) and class III (40 kg/m2 ≤ BMI) did not increase significantly, and did not find that obesity consistently conferred risk of developing VTE [25]. The present study showed an increased incidence of thrombosis in the patients with increased severity of COVID-19, and obesity did not statistically significantly lead to an increased rate of thrombosis. Previous reports from Japan showed patients with VTE had higher BMI, but also had more severe status of COVID-19 [21], [36]. Thus, these findings may indicate that development of VTE was attributable mainly to increased severity of COVID-19, but not to obesity. Additionally, our findings are consistent with a recent meta-analysis that found that some risk factors of VTE, including obesity, were not associated with VTE in patients with COVID-19 [37]. These results support the hypothesis that immune-thrombosis is implicated in the thrombosis associated with COVID-19 [38] . Severe status of COVID-19 may lead to hyperactivation of the immune system, causing hypercoagulation presenting with D-dimer elevation and vascular endothelial dysfunction, resulting in immune-thrombosis in small to large vessels [38] . Patients with obesity should be treated with sufficient attention to disease progression; however, obesity might not be a strong risk factor of thrombosis, which suggested that patients with obesity might not have to receive routine pharmacological thromboprophylaxis especially among clinically stable patients. Study limitations. The present study has several limitations. First, the present study was based on an observational study and the clinical management including vaccination, anti-viral treatment, and prophylactic anticoagulation was determined by the discretion of the attending physicians, which may have influenced the clinical outcomes. In addition, VTE screening had not been performed in all patients, which could lead to the underdiagnosis of thrombosis. Second, the number of patients with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 35) was small, which may have influenced our evaluation of the association between severe obesity and thrombosis. Finally, the present study investigated only clinical outcomes during hospitalization; thus, the influence of obesity on thrombosis after hospital discharge remains unclear.

Conclusions

In the present large-scale observational study, obesity was not significantly associated with the development of thrombosis during hospitalization; however, it was associated with severity of COVID-19.
  38 in total

1.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Maarten L Simoons; Bernard R Chaitman; Harvey D White; Hugo A Katus; Bertil Lindahl; David A Morrow; Peter M Clemmensen; Per Johanson; Hanoch Hod; Richard Underwood; Jeroen J Bax; Robert O Bonow; Fausto Pinto; Raymond J Gibbons; Keith A Fox; Dan Atar; L Kristin Newby; Marcello Galvani; Christian W Hamm; Barry F Uretsky; Ph Gabriel Steg; William Wijns; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Phillippe Menasché; Jan Ravkilde; E Magnus Ohman; Elliott M Antman; Lars C Wallentin; Paul W Armstrong; Maarten L Simoons; James L Januzzi; Markku S Nieminen; Mihai Gheorghiade; Gerasimos Filippatos; Russell V Luepker; Stephen P Fortmann; Wayne D Rosamond; Dan Levy; David Wood; Sidney C Smith; Dayi Hu; José-Luis Lopez-Sendon; Rose Marie Robertson; Douglas Weaver; Michal Tendera; Alfred A Bove; Alexander N Parkhomenko; Elena J Vasilieva; Shanti Mendis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score.

Authors:  S Barbar; F Noventa; V Rossetto; A Ferrari; B Brandolin; M Perlati; E De Bon; D Tormene; A Pagnan; P Prandoni
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.824

3.  Association of high level gene expression of ACE2 in adipose tissue with mortality of COVID-19 infection in obese patients.

Authors:  Sammy Al-Benna
Journal:  Obes Med       Date:  2020-07-18

4.  Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1995

5.  Incidence and Clinical Features of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Japan.

Authors:  Yugo Yamashita; Yuuki Maruyama; Hirono Satokawa; Yuji Nishimoto; Ichizo Tsujino; Hideki Sakashita; Hiroko Nakata; Yoshinori Okuno; Yoshito Ogihara; Sen Yachi; Naoki Toya; Masami Shingaki; Satoshi Ikeda; Naoto Yamamoto; Shizu Aikawa; Nobutaka Ikeda; Hiroya Hayashi; Shingo Ishiguro; Eriko Iwata; Michihisa Umetsu; Akane Kondo; Takehisa Iwai; Takao Kobayashi; Makoto Mo; Norikazu Yamada
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 2.993

6.  Body Mass Index and Risk for Intubation or Death in SARS-CoV-2 Infection : A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michaela R Anderson; Joshua Geleris; David R Anderson; Jason Zucker; Yael R Nobel; Daniel Freedberg; Jennifer Small-Saunders; Kartik N Rajagopalan; Richard Greendyk; Sae-Rom Chae; Karthik Natarajan; David Roh; Ethan Edwin; Dympna Gallagher; Anna Podolanczuk; R Graham Barr; Anthony W Ferrante; Matthew R Baldwin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Risk factors for severity on admission and the disease progression during hospitalisation in a large cohort of patients with COVID-19 in Japan.

Authors:  Mari Terada; Hiroshi Ohtsu; Sho Saito; Kayoko Hayakawa; Shinya Tsuzuki; Yusuke Asai; Nobuaki Matsunaga; Satoshi Kutsuna; Wataru Sugiura; Norio Ohmagari
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  High Prevalence of Obesity in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.

Authors:  Arthur Simonnet; Mikael Chetboun; Julien Poissy; Violeta Raverdy; Jerome Noulette; Alain Duhamel; Julien Labreuche; Daniel Mathieu; Francois Pattou; Merce Jourdain
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 9.298

9.  Characteristics and outcomes of 627 044 COVID-19 patients living with and without obesity in the United States, Spain, and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Martina Recalde; Elena Roel; Andrea Pistillo; Anthony G Sena; Albert Prats-Uribe; Waheed-Ul-Rahman Ahmed; Heba Alghoul; Thamir M Alshammari; Osaid Alser; Carlos Areia; Edward Burn; Paula Casajust; Dalia Dawoud; Scott L DuVall; Thomas Falconer; Sergio Fernández-Bertolín; Asieh Golozar; Mengchun Gong; Lana Yin Hui Lai; Jennifer C E Lane; Kristine E Lynch; Michael E Matheny; Paras P Mehta; Daniel R Morales; Karthik Natarjan; Fredrik Nyberg; Jose D Posada; Christian G Reich; Peter R Rijnbeek; Lisa M Schilling; Karishma Shah; Nigam H Shah; Vignesh Subbian; Lin Zhang; Hong Zhu; Patrick Ryan; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Kristin Kostka; Talita Duarte-Salles
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  Obesity aggravates COVID-19: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Congmin Tian; Ying Chen; Chunyan Zhu; Hongyu Chi; Jiahao Li
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 20.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.