Literature DB >> 32626497

Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems.

Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Klaus Depner, Julian Ashley Drewe, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas, Christian Gortázar Schmidt, Virginie Michel, Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca, Helen Clare Roberts, Liisa Helena Sihvonen, Hans Spoolder, Karl Stahl, Antonio Velarde Calvo, Arvo Viltrop, Stephanie Buijs, Sandra Edwards, Denise Candiani, Olaf Mosbach-Schulz, Yves Van der Stede, Christoph Winckler.   

Abstract

The AGRI committee of the European Parliament requested EFSA to assess the welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems, including organic production, and to update its 2005 scientific opinion about the health and welfare of rabbits kept for meat production. Considering reproducing does, kits and growing rabbits, this scientific opinion focusses on six different housing systems, namely conventional cages, structurally enriched cages, elevated pens, floor pens, outdoor/partially outdoor systems and organic systems. To compare the level of welfare in the different housing systems and rabbit categories, welfare impact scores for 20 welfare consequences identified from the literature were calculated, taking their occurrence, duration and severity into account. Based on the overall welfare impact score (sum of scores for the single welfare consequences), obtained via a 2-step expert knowledge elicitation process, the welfare of reproducing does is likely (certainty 66-90%) to be lower in conventional cages compared to the five other housing systems. In addition, it is likely to extremely likely (certainty 66-99%) that the welfare of kits is lower in outdoor systems compared to the other systems and that the welfare is higher in elevated pens than in the other systems. Finally, it is likely to extremely likely (certainty 66-99%) that the welfare of growing rabbits is lower in conventional cages compared to the other systems and that the welfare is higher in elevated pens than in the other systems. Ranking of the welfare consequences allowed an analysis of the main welfare consequences within each system and rabbit category. It was concluded that for reproducing does, as well as growing rabbits, welfare consequences related to behavioural restrictions were more prominent in conventional cages, elevated pens and enriched cages, whereas those related to health problems were more important in floor pens, outdoor and organic systems. Housing in organic rabbit farming is diverse, which can result in different welfare consequences, but the overall welfare impact scores suggest that welfare in organic systems is generally good.
© 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; housing system; organic farming; rabbit; reproducing doe

Year:  2020        PMID: 32626497      PMCID: PMC7008839          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


  5 in total

1.  Welfare of domestic birds and rabbits transported in containers.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Malcolm Mitchell; Leonardo James Vinco; Eva Voslarova; Denise Candiani; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Antonio Velarde
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-09-07

2.  Purchasing Habits, Sustainability Perceptions, and Welfare Concerns of Italian Consumers Regarding Rabbit Meat.

Authors:  Stefania Crovato; Anna Pinto; Guido Di Martino; Giulia Mascarello; Valentina Rizzoli; Silvia Marcolin; Licia Ravarotto
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-04-21

3.  Effects of Long-Term Supplementation with Brown Seaweeds and Polyphenols in Rabbit on Meat Quality Parameters.

Authors:  Raffaella Rossi; Francesco Vizzarri; Sabrina Ratti; Marisa Palazzo; Donato Casamassima; Carlo Corino
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Use of Gnawing Hay Blocks: Effects on Productive Performance, Behavior and Reactivity of Growing Rabbits Kept in Parks with Different Sex-Group Compositions.

Authors:  Marco Birolo; Angela Trocino; Andrea Zuffellato; Fabrizio Pirrone; Francesco Bordignon; Gerolamo Xiccato
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  A pilot study about on-farm assessment of health and welfare in rabbits kept in different housing systems.

Authors:  Angela Trocino; Francesca Menegon; Cristina Zomeño; Dario Pasqualin; Giovanni Cunial; Gerolamo Xiccato; Fabrizio Pirrone; Daniela Bertotto; Martina Bortoletti; Francesco Dorigo; Antonio Lavazza; Guido Di Martino
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.