Literature DB >> 36092764

Welfare of small ruminants during transport.

Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Elisabetta Canali, Julian Ashley Drewe, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas, Christian Gortázar Schmidt, Virginie Michel, Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca, Barbara Padalino, Paolo Pasquali, Helen Clare Roberts, Hans Spoolder, Karl Stahl, Antonio Velarde, Arvo Viltrop, Christoph Winckler, Bernadette Earley, Sandra Edwards, Luigi Faucitano, Sonia Marti, Genaro C Miranda de La Lama, Leonardo Nanni Costa, Peter T Thomsen, Sean Ashe, Lina Mur, Yves Van der Stede, Mette Herskin.   

Abstract

In the framework of its Farm to Fork Strategy, the Commission is undertaking a comprehensive evaluation of animal welfare legislation. The present Opinion deals with the protection of small ruminants (sheep and goats) during transport. The main focus is on welfare of sheep during transport by road but other means of transport and concerns for welfare of goats during transport are also covered. Current practices related to transport of sheep during the different stages (preparation, loading and unloading, transit and journey breaks) are described. Overall, 11 welfare consequences were identified as being highly relevant for the welfare of sheep during transport based on severity, duration and frequency of occurrence: group stress, handling stress, heat stress, injuries, motion stress, predation stress, prolonged hunger, prolonged thirst, restriction of movement, resting problems and sensory overstimulation. These welfare consequences and their animal-based measures are described. A wide variety of hazards, mainly relating to inappropriate or aggressive handling of animals, structural deficiencies of vehicles and facilities, unfavourable microclimatic and environmental conditions and poor husbandry practices, leading to these welfare consequences were identified. The Opinion contains general and specific conclusions in relation to the different stages of transport. Recommendations to prevent hazards and to correct or mitigate welfare consequences have been developed. Recommendations were also developed to define quantitative thresholds for microclimatic conditions within the means of transport and spatial thresholds (minimum space allowance). The development of welfare consequences over time were assessed in relation to maximum journey time. The Opinion covers specific animal transport scenarios identified by the European Commission relating to the export of sheep by livestock vessels, export of sheep by road, roll-on-roll-off vessels and 'special health status animals', and lists welfare concerns associated with these.
© 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Farm to Fork Strategy; animal welfare assessment; animal‐based measures; goats; hazards; quantitative thresholds; sheep; small ruminants; transport; welfare consequences

Year:  2022        PMID: 36092764      PMCID: PMC9449987          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


  134 in total

Review 1.  Fitness of animals for transport to slaughter.

Authors:  Michael S Cockram
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 2.  Review: Precision livestock farming, automats and new technologies: possible applications in extensive dairy sheep farming.

Authors:  M Odintsov Vaintrub; H Levit; M Chincarini; I Fusaro; M Giammarco; G Vignola
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Virginie Michel; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Sandra Edwards; Sean Ashe; Denise Candiani; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Cristina Rojo Gimeno; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Christoph Winckler
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-07-12

4.  Livestock drivers' knowledge about dairy cow fitness for transport - A Danish questionnaire survey.

Authors:  M S Herskin; A Hels; I Anneberg; P T Thomsen
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.534

Review 5.  The welfare risks and impacts of heat stress on sheep shipped from Australia to the Middle East.

Authors:  Clive Phillips
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.688

6.  The Effect of Mother Goat Presence during Rearing on Kids' Response to Isolation and to an Arena Test.

Authors:  Louise Winblad von Walter; Björn Forkman; Madeleine Högberg; Eva Hydbring-Sandberg
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Recognition of lameness and decisions to catch for inspection among sheep farmers and specialists in GB.

Authors:  J Kaler; L E Green
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 8.  How Farm Animals React and Perceive Stressful Situations Such As Handling, Restraint, and Transport.

Authors:  Temple Grandin; Chelsey Shivley
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Qualitative Behavioural Assessment as a Method to Identify Potential Stressors during Commercial Sheep Transport.

Authors:  Teresa Collins; Catherine A Stockman; Anne L Barnes; David W Miller; Sarah L Wickham; Patricia A Fleming
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.