Literature DB >> 3609193

Comparison of smooth pursuit and combined eye-head tracking in human subjects with deficient labyrinthine function.

R J Leigh, J A Sharpe, P J Ranalli, S E Thurston, M A Hamid.   

Abstract

The effects of deficient labyrinthine function on smooth visual tracking with the eyes and head were investigated in ten patients with bilateral peripheral vestibular disease. Ten normal subjects served as controls. In the patients active, combined eye-head tracking (EHT) was significantly better than smooth pursuit (SP) with the eyes alone with a target frequency of 1.0 Hz. Normal subjects pursued equally well with SP and with active EHT. The gain of compensatory eye movements during active head rotation in darkness was also measured. Compensatory eye movements in labyrinthine-deficient patients (attributable to residual vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), cervico-ocular reflex (COR) and pre-programmed eye movements) were always less than in normal subjects. These data were used to examine current hypotheses that postulate central cancellation of the VOR (or compensatory eye movements) during EHT. A model that proposes summation of an internal smooth pursuit command and VOR/compensatory eye movements accounted for the findings in normal subjects and labyrinthine-deficient patients. In seven labyrinthine-deficient patients and nine normal subjects, passive EHT was measured during en bloc rotation while they viewed a head-fixed target. With a target frequency of 1.0 Hz, both subjects and patients showed significantly better tracking during passive EHT than during SP. Normal subjects also showed superior tracking during passive EHT compared with active EHT. These findings support the notion that during passive EHT, parametric gain changes contribute to modulation of the VOR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3609193     DOI: 10.1007/BF00270678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Target velocity signals of visual tracking in vermal Purkinje cells of the monkey.

Authors:  M Kase; H Noda; D A Suzuki; D C Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Voluntary, non-visual control of the human vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  C C Barr; L W Schultheis; D A Robinson
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1976 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Linear model for visual-vestibular interaction.

Authors:  C G Lau; V Honrubia; H A Jenkins; R W Baloh; R D Yee
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1978-07

4.  Coordination of the head and eyes in pursuit of predictable and random target motion.

Authors:  M Gresty; J Leech
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1977-08

5.  Adaptive modification of the vestibulo-ocular reflex by mental effort in darkness.

Authors:  G M Jones; A Berthoz; B Segal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Eye-head coordination in labyrinthine-defective human beings.

Authors:  T Kasai; D S Zee
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-04-07       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Purkinje cell activity in the primate flocculus during optokinetic stimulation, smooth pursuit eye movements and VOR-suppression.

Authors:  U Büttner; W Waespe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Bilateral vestibular loss, oscillopsia, and the cervico-ocular reflex.

Authors:  B R Chambers; M Mai; H O Barber
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Neuron activity in monkey vestibular nuclei during vertical vestibular stimulation and eye movements.

Authors:  M C Chubb; A F Fuchs; C A Scudder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Voluntary modulation of the vestibuloocular reflex in humans and its relation to smooth pursuit.

Authors:  P A McKinley; B W Peterson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effects of earth-fixed vs head-fixed targets on static ocular counterroll.

Authors:  Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Zahra Hirji; Herbert C Goltz; Giuseppe Mirabella; Alan W Blakeman; Linda Colpa; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04

Review 2.  Anticipatory eye movements stabilize gaze during self-generated head movements.

Authors:  W M King; Natela Shanidze
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Optically induced plasticity of the cervico-ocular reflex in patients with bilateral absence of vestibular function.

Authors:  S Heimbrand; A M Bronstein; M A Gresty; M E Faldon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual cancellation of the torsional vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans.

Authors:  R J Leigh; E F Maas; G E Grossman; D A Robinson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Coordination of eye and head movements during smooth pursuit in patients with vestibular failure.

Authors:  J A Waterston; G R Barnes; M A Grealy; L M Luxon
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Comparison of smooth pursuit and combined eye-head tracking in human subjects with deficient labyrinthine function.

Authors:  R J Leigh; J A Sharpe; P J Ranalli; S E Thurston; M A Hamid
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Head-free pursuit in the human of a visual target moving in a pseudo-random manner.

Authors:  G R Barnes; J F Lawson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Compensation following bilateral vestibular damage.

Authors:  Andrew A McCall; Bill J Yates
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.