| Literature DB >> 36091520 |
Hao Wang1, Yanjie Hou2, Lin Zhang2, Man Yang1, Ruyue Deng2, Jun Yao1,2,3.
Abstract
Elderly migrants who face the dual challenges of aging and migration are more likely to suffer psychological disorders. Existing research has demonstrated a link between loneliness and psychological disorders in the general elderly population. However, we know little about the relationships among elderly migrants, and the psychological mechanisms linking them. This study aims to examine the effects of loneliness on anxiety and depressive symptoms among Chinese elderly migrants, and explore the mediating roles of perceived stress and resilience. All 654 participants were recruited in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China. Results showed that loneliness was significantly correlated with anxiety and depressive symptoms (p < 0.001). Perceived stress and resilience mediated the relationship between loneliness and anxiety symptoms. The mediating effect of perceived stress was 0.128 (Bootstrap 95% CI: 0.092-0.168, Ratio = 37.4%). Resilience was 0.026 (Bootstrap 95% CI: 0.005-0.049, Ratio = 7.6%). Furthermore, perceived stress and resilience also mediated the relationship between loneliness and depressive symptoms. The mediating effects were 0.111 and 0.043, respectively (Bootstrap 95% CI: 0.073-0.151, Ratio = 27.9%; Bootstrap 95% CI: 0.020-0.069, Ratio = 10.8%). All the mediating effects were significant because the bootstrap 95% CIs did not contain zero. Overall, our findings suggested that loneliness not only can directly influence elderly migrants' anxiety and depressive symptoms but also by increasing perceived stress or decreasing resilience.Entities:
Keywords: anxiety; depression; elderly migrants; loneliness; mediation analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36091520 PMCID: PMC9452831 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.998532
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Hypothesized relationships between loneliness, perceived stress, resilience, anxiety and depression.
Scale items of UCAL-3, PSS and CD-RISC-10.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| UCAL-3 | How often do you feel the lack of company? |
| How often do you feel that life is boring? | |
| How often do you feel isolated from others? | |
| PSS | Feeling distracted by something that cannot be expected to happen. |
| Feeling unable to control the important things in your life. | |
| Feeling jittery and stressed. | |
| Successfully deal with annoying life troubles. | |
| Feel that you can effectively deal with important changes in your life. | |
| Feel confident in being able to handle your own personal issues. | |
| Feel that things are going well. | |
| Find yourself unable to handle all the things you have to do. | |
| There are ways to control the annoying things in your life. | |
| Feel like you are in charge of things. | |
| You are often angry because many things are happening beyond your control. | |
| You often feel that there are things you have to accomplish. | |
| Able to master the way of time arrangement. | |
| Feel that difficult things are piling up and you can't get over them. | |
| CD-RISC-10 | I can adapt to changes. |
| I can handle anything. | |
| I can find the humorous side of things. | |
| Dealing with stress makes me stronger. | |
| I can bounce back after illness and hardship. | |
| Even with the obstacles, I can still achieve my goals. | |
| Under pressure, I can still focus and think clearly. | |
| I don't get discouraged easily by failure. | |
| I consider myself a strong person. | |
| I can deal with unpleasant feelings. |
Demographic characteristics of 654 participants.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 654 | 66.05 ± 4.67 | |
| Gender | Male | 216 | 33.0% |
| Female | 438 | 67.0% | |
| Marital status | Divorced or widowed | 101 | 15.4% |
| Married with spouse | 553 | 84.6% | |
| Education level | Primary school or lower | 354 | 54.1% |
| Junior or senior high school | 262 | 40.1% | |
| College or higher | 38 | 5.8% | |
| Religious belief | No | 555 | 84.9% |
| Yes | 99 | 15.1% | |
| Household registration | Rural | 453 | 69.3% |
| Town | 201 | 30.7% | |
| Retirement pension | No | 251 | 38.4% |
| Yes | 403 | 61.6% | |
| Yearly income (¥) | 0–5,000 | 249 | 38.0% |
| 5,001–10,000 | 126 | 19.3% | |
| 10,001–20,000 | 87 | 13.3% | |
| >20,000 | 192 | 29.4% |
The results of Pearson correlation analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Loneliness | 4.02 | 1.43 | 1 | ||||
| 2. Perceived stress | 20.87 | 7.66 | 0.398 | 1 | |||
| 3. Resilience | 33.06 | 7.53 | −0.298 | −0.607 | 1 | ||
| 4. Anxiety | 11.20 | 3.36 | 0.361 | 0.499 | −0.378 | 1 | |
| 5. Depression | 5.00 | 3.99 | 0.430 | 0.517 | −0.444 | 0.521 | 1 |
p < 0.001 (two-tailed).
The results of the multiple mediation model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total indirect effect | 0.154 | 0.020 | 0.116 | 0.195 | 45.0% |
| Indirect effect 1 (X → M1 → Y) | 0.128 | 0.020 | 0.092 | 0.168 | 37.4% |
| Indirect effect 2 (X → M2 → Y) | 0.026 | 0.011 | 0.005 | 0.049 | 7.6% |
| Compare 1 (Indirect effect 1 minus 2) | 0.103 | 0.025 | 0.055 | 0.153 |
X, Loneliness; Y, Anxiety; M1, Perceived stress; M2, Resilience. Ratio, the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect.
The bootstrap 95% CIs not contain zero. Age, sex, marital status, education level, religious belief, household registration, retirement pension and yearly income were analyzed as control variables. All values have been standardized.
The results of the multiple mediation model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total indirect effect | 0.154 | 0.020 | 0.115 | 0.194 | 38.7% |
| Indirect effect 1 (X → M1 → Y) | 0.111 | 0.020 | 0.073 | 0.151 | 27.9% |
| Indirect effect 2 (X → M2 → Y) | 0.043 | 0.012 | 0.020 | 0.069 | 10.8% |
| Compare 1 (Indirect effect 1 minus 2) | 0.068 | 0.026 | 0.016 | 0.120 |
X, Loneliness; Y, Depression; M1, Perceived stress; M2, Resilience. Ratio, the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect.
The bootstrap 95% CIs not contain zero. Age, sex, marital status, education level, religious belief, household registration, retirement pension and yearly income were analyzed as control variables. All values have been standardized.
Figure 2The multiple mediation model of the association between loneliness and anxiety through perceived stress and resilience. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 (two-tailed). All values have been standardized.
Figure 3The multiple mediation model of the association between loneliness and depression through perceived stress and resilience. ***p < 0.001 (two-tailed). All values have been standardized.