| Literature DB >> 36091505 |
Dhananjayan Dhanasooraj1, Prasanth Viswanathan2, Shammy Saphia1, Beena Philomina Jose3, Fairoz Cheriyalingal Parambath3, Saritha Sivadas2, N P Akash2, T V Vimisha2, Priyanka Raveendranadhan Nair2, Anuja Mohan2, Nimin Hafeez2, Jayesh Kumar Poovullathi4, Shameer Vadekkandiyil4, Sajeeth Kumar Keriyatt Govindan4, Rajan Khobragade5, K P Aravindan6, Chandni Radhakrishnan7.
Abstract
Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) is the gold standard for the detection of new variants of SARS-CoV-2 including those which have immune escape properties, high infectivity, and variable severity. This test is helpful in genomic surveillance, for planning appropriate and timely public health interventions. But labs with NGS facilities are not available in small or medium research settings due to the high cost of setting up such a facility. Transportation of samples from many places to few centers for NGS testing also produces delays due to transportation and sample overload leading in turn to delays in patient management and community interventions. This becomes more important for patients traveling from hotspot regions or those suspected of harboring a new variant. Another major issue is the high cost of NGS-based tests. Thus, it may not be a good option for an economically viable surveillance program requiring immediate result generation and patient follow-up. The current study used a cost-effective facility which can be set up in a common research lab and which is replicable in similar centers with expertise in Sanger nucleotide sequencing. More samples can be processed at a time and can generate the results in a maximum of 2 days (1 day for a 24 h working lab). We analyzed the nucleotide sequence of the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) region of SARS-CoV-2 by the Sanger sequencing using in-house developed methods. The SARS-CoV-2 variant surveillance was done during the period of March 2021 to May 2022 in the Northern region of Kerala, a state in India with a population of 36.4 million, for implementing appropriate timely interventions. Our findings broadly agree with those from elsewhere in India and other countries during the period.Entities:
Keywords: Kerala; Receptor Binding Domain; SARS-CoV-2; Sanger sequencing; genomic surveillance; spike gene sequencing
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36091505 PMCID: PMC9454329 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.974667
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Details of the primers used in the study.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CVSP3F | TGTGCACTTGACCCTCTCTC | 1,144 bp |
| 2 | CVSP4R | CGCATATACCTGCACCAATG | |
| 3 | CVSB2F | GTGAAGTTTTTAACGCCACCAGATTTGC | 854 bp |
| 4 | CVSB2R | AGCAACAGGGACTTCTGTGC | |
| 5 | CVSP4F | CTATCAGGCCGGTAGCACAC | Sequencing only |
Details of samples collected during phase 1 (March 2021 to October 2021) which met the inclusion criteria.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cluster | 281 | 40.03 |
| 2 | High TPR area | 143 | 20.37 |
| 3 | Infection after Single dose vaccine | 56 | 7.98 |
| 4 | Infection after Two doses of vaccine | 212 | 30.20 |
| 5 | Patient with no co-morbidity in ICU | 1 | 0.14 |
| 6 | Reinfection | 6 | 0.85 |
| 7 | Traveler from abroad | 3 | 0.43 |
Details of samples collected during phase 2 (January 2022 to May 2022) which met the inclusion criteria.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cat 1: All symptomatic (ILI symptoms) cases including health care workers and frontline workers | 107 | 15.09 |
| 2 | Cat 2: Asymptomatic direct and high-risk contacts (contacts in family and workplace, elderly ≥ 65 | 124 | 17.49 |
| 3 | Cat 3: Asymptomatic high-risk individuals | 76 | 10.72 |
| 4 | Cat 4: All symptomatic (ILI symptoms) individuals with history of international travel in the last 14 days | 2 | 0.28 |
| 5 | Cat 5: All symptomatic (ILI symptoms) contacts of a laboratory confirmed case | 100 | 14.10 |
| 6 | Cat 6: All symptomatic (ILI symptoms) health care workers/frontline workers involved in containment | 12 | 1.69 |
| 7 | Cat 7: All symptomatic ILI cases among returnees and migrants within 7 days of illness | 3 | 0.42 |
| 8 | Cat 8: Asymptomatic high-risk contacts (contacts in family and workplace, elderly ≥ 65 years of | 51 | 7.19 |
| 9 | Cat 9: All patients of Severe Acute Respiratory Infection (SARI) | 4 | 0.56 |
| 10 | Cat 10: All symptomatic (ILI symptoms) patients presenting in a healthcare setting | 22 | 3.10 |
| 11 | Cat 11: Asymptomatic high-risk patients who are hospitalized or seeking immediate hospitalization | 8 | 1.13 |
| 12 | Cat 12: Asymptomatic patients undergoing surgical/non-surgical invasive procedures (not to be test | 20 | 2.82 |
| 13 | Cat 13: All pregnant women in/near labor who are hospitalized for delivery | 1 | 0.14 |
| 14 | Cat 17: All individuals who wish to get themselves tested | 150 | 21.16 |
| 15 | Others/miscellaneous | 29 | 4.09 |
Variants of SARS-CoV-2 identified in the study.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B1.1.7 (Alpha) | 4 | 0.27 |
| 2 | B1.351 (Beta) | 1 | 0.07 |
| 3 | B1.617.1 (Kappa) | 1 | 0.07 |
| 4 | B1.617.2 (Delta) | 701 | |
| 5 | Delta (unspecified) | 2 | |
| 6 | All Delta (Sl. No. 4 & Sl. No. 5) | 703 | 46.59 |
| 7 | Omicron | 798 | 52.88 |
| 8 | Not defined | 5 | 0.33 |
Figure 1The variants detected per month during the study period (samples received from March 2021 to May 2022).
Figure 2Age-wise analysis of variants observed during the study period (from March 2021 to May 2022).