| Literature DB >> 36091061 |
Liqing Wei1, Xiaohong Ying1, Mengxi Zhai1, Jiayu Li1, Dan Liu1, Xin Liu1, Bin Yu1,2, Hong Yan1.
Abstract
Prenatal stress can affect pregnant women in an epigenetic way during the critical period of conception of their offspring. The study aims to investigate the relationship between peritraumatic distress, prenatal perceived stress, depression, and glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) DNA methylation among pregnant women who experienced COVID-19 lockdown in China. Study data were collected from 30 pregnant women in Wuhan and Huanggang, China. The Peritraumatic Distress Inventory was used to measure peritraumatic distress, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was used to measure depressive symptoms, and the Perceived Stress Scale was used to measure perceived stress. DNA methylation in the exon 1F promoter region of NR3C1 gene from the venous blood mononuclear cell genome was characterized by bisulfite sequencing. Correlation and linear regression were used for data analysis. The mean level of peritraumatic distress, perceived stress, and depression was 6.30 (SD = 5.09), 6.50 (SD = 5.41), and 6.60 (SD = 4.85), respectively, with 23.33% of pregnant women being depressed. The mean NR3C1 methylation was 0.65 (SD = 0.22). Prenatal depression was positively correlated with the degree of methylation in venous blood from the mother (r = 0.59, p = 0.001), and depression predicted methylation of NR3C1 gene at the CpG 8 site (β = 0.05, p = 0.03). No association was found between peritraumatic distress as well as perceived stress and methylation of NR3C1. NR3C1 gene was susceptible to epigenetic modification of DNA methylation in the context of prenatal stress, and maternal depression was associated with increased NR3C1 methylation among women who experienced COVID-19 lockdown.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; NR3C1; depression; glucocorticoid receptor; perceived stress; peritraumatic distress; pregnant women
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36091061 PMCID: PMC9453447 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.966522
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 1Schematic representation of NR3C1 gene and the CpG sites analyzed.
Characteristics of the study sample.
| Variables | Category | N | % |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 30 | 100.00 | |
|
| |||
| Mean (SD) | 29.13 | 5.63 | |
| 21–25 | 9 | 30.00 | |
| 26–30 | 8 | 26.67 | |
| >30 | 13 | 43.33 | |
|
| |||
| Huanggang | 23 | 76.67 | |
| Wuhan | 7 | 23.33 | |
|
| |||
| Urban | 14 | 46.67 | |
| Rural | 16 | 53.33 | |
|
| |||
| Middle school or lower | 10 | 33.33 | |
| High school | 8 | 26.67 | |
| College or higher | 12 | 40.00 | |
|
| |||
| Middle school or lower | 10 | 33.33 | |
| High school | 4 | 13.33 | |
| College or higher | 16 | 53.33 | |
|
| |||
| Full-time job | 15 | 50.00 | |
| Part-time job/others | 15 | 50.00 | |
|
| |||
| ≤2,000 | 10 | 33.33 | |
| 2,001–5,000 | 14 | 46.67 | |
| >5,000 | 6 | 20.00 | |
|
| |||
| ≤10,000 | 13 | 43.33 | |
| 10,001–20,000 | 9 | 30.00 | |
| >20,000 | 8 | 26.67 | |
|
| |||
| ≤3 | 8 | 26.67 | |
| 4 | 8 | 26.67 | |
| ≥5 | 14 | 46.67 | |
|
| Mean (SD) | 6.30 | 5.09 |
|
| Mean (SD) | 6.50 | 5.41 |
|
| |||
| Yes | 7 | 23.33 | |
| No | 23 | 76.67 | |
|
| Mean (SD) | 6.60 | 4.85 |
Levels of NR3C1 methylation among pregnant women, overall and by demographic groups, and levels of depression.
| Variables | Methylation (%) | F/t | p |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 64.48 (21.58) | ||
|
| 0.46 | 0.64 | |
| 21–25 | 67.90 (18.79) | ||
| 26–30 | 58.33 (25.02) | ||
| >30 | 65.81 (21.97) | ||
|
| −0.03 | 0.98 | |
| Urban | 64.29 (20.06) | ||
| Rural | 64.58 (23.38) | ||
|
| 0.30 | 0.74 | |
| Junior high school or lower | 67.78 (21.88) | ||
| High school or junior college | 59.72 (25.15) | ||
| College or higher | 64.81 (20.01) | ||
|
| 0.10 | 0.90 | |
| Junior high school or lower | 66.67 (22.22) | ||
| High school or junior college | 61.11 (26.45) | ||
| College or higher | 63.89 (21.28) | ||
|
| 3.07 | 0.09 | |
| Full-time job | 71.11 (16.69) | ||
| Part-time job/others | 57.78 (24.20) | ||
|
| 2.92 | 0.07 | |
| ≤2,000 | 57.78 (23.31) | ||
| 2,001–5,000 | 73.81 (14.85) | ||
| >5,000 | 53.70 (25.74) | ||
|
| 0.04 | 0.96 | |
| ≤10,000 | 65.81 (22.43) | ||
| 10,001–20,000 | 62.96 (19.25) | ||
| >20,000 | 63.89 (25.02) | ||
|
| 0.71 | 0.50 | |
| ≤3 | 65.28 (20.09) | ||
| 4 | 56.94 (28.75) | ||
| ≥5 | 68.25 (17.89) | ||
|
| −2.13 | 0.06 | |
| Yes | 77.78 (18.14) | ||
| No | 60.39 (21.14) |
Figure 2Correlation between (A) peritraumatic distress and NR3C1 gene methylation, (B) perceived stress and NR3C1 gene methylation, and (C) depression and NR3C1 gene methylation.
Effects of peritraumatic distress, perceived stress and depression on NR3C1 gene CpG sites methylation among pregnant women.
| NR3C1 gene CpG site | Beta | SE | p | p# | Adjusted R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| CpG 1 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.36 | 0.63 | −0.01 |
| CpG 2 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.54 | 0.07 |
| CpG 3 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.54 | 0.05 |
| CpG 4 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.42 | 0.63 | −0.01 |
| CpG 5 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.91 | 0.94 | −0.04 |
| CpG 6 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.94 | 0.94 | −0.04 |
| CpG 7 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.54 | 0.03 |
| CpG 8 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.73 | 0.94 | −0.03 |
| CpG 9 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.35 | 0.63 | −0.003 |
|
| |||||
| CpG 1 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.28 | 0.92 | 0.01 |
| CpG 2 | 0.003 | 0.01 | 0.78 | 0.92 | −0.03 |
| CpG 3 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.67 | 0.92 | −0.03 |
| CpG 4 | 0.002 | 0.01 | 0.89 | 0.92 | −0.03 |
| CpG 5 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.41 | 0.92 | −0.01 |
| CpG 6 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.72 | 0.92 | −0.03 |
| CpG 7 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 0.92 | −0.01 |
| CpG 8 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.50 | 0.09 |
| CpG 9 | −0.002 | 0.02 | 0.92 | 0.92 | −0.04 |
|
| |||||
| CpG 1 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.02 |
| CpG 2 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.08 |
| CpG 3 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.05 |
| CpG 4 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.04 |
| CpG 5 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.03 |
| CpG 6 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| CpG 7 | −0.003 | 0.02 | 0.87 | 0.87 | −0.03 |
| CpG 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| CpG 9 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.13 |
The regression model was controlled for age, city, and residence.
Multiple testing was adjusted using the false discovery rate (FDR) method.
Bold values indicate that CpG8 was found to be significantly associated with depression.